Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Not Va Related But Still Disrespectful To Vets

Rate this question


Veldrina

Question

This kind of thing really burns my britches, especially when the moron in question becomes a celebrity because of it. It really angers me when I hear of guys parading around as soldiers or veterans when they've never served, or didn't graduate boot camp (and I don;t mean those who couldn't through no fault of their own by way of injury/disease). There was that idiot Charlie Andrews on the national Geographic show "Knights of Mayhem" who purported to be a Navy Seal but never got out of boot camp, and was just a disgrace to Seals, knights, & the human race itself. Now there is Steve Jordan. He's a public figure (1st clue that he's prolly not even legit & just a troll, no actual profile, just a public figure page) on Facebook who pretends to be a Ranger, claims he has a Parachutist Badge, Purple Heart, etc. & helped rescue POWs from Vietnam....yet mysteriously won't give any dates, unit assignments or any other proof when asked.

This is a petition sire that was started by another vet under Stolen Valor to shut him down:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/885/petition-to-arrest-and-prosecute-under-the-stolen-valor-act/

And pls feel free to drop by his Facebook Page under Steve Jordan. Maybe you guys will have better luck at finding out some history, as I;ve tried a few times & he just doesn't seem to have answers for me....mad.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I work with one of these "SEALS" and wish it didn't burn my butt so bad! Everybody falls for this guy and his facade.

He long ago turned it on me, being buddies with supervisors who consider me the problem. I was notified that I would face dismissal for any conflict with him or words about him.

I refer to him on vet forums as "SEAL T-shirt guy". He must have at least a couple hundred bucks worth plus camo pants, jungle boots, etc.

The guy never served! Not a day! His father was career military and died long before he started this crap. I had many people argue that he was a SEAL. My other nickname for him is "mr. plausible deniability". Apparently all these people think he served through no fault whatsoever of his own. Never says anything straight out unless it is with only one witness, and answers questions with non-answers that can be twisted and denied.

If someone asked you "were you a SEAL?", imagine all the ways you could put them on the wrong track and later deny an affirmative answer.

"HOOYAH"

"What do you think?"

"well, I don't like to talk about it"

He likes to start sentences with things like "in the SEALs it's done like this...", and the favorite "well, when I was in Coronado..." (he apparently lived in the area as a teen).

I am a 100% disabled vet and served briefly in the 2/75th Ranger Bn.. I suppose if I had any stories to tell tney wouldn't be near as interesting as the ones wannabes spin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

W e had a vice president where I retired from that used tell war stories about Vietnam to anybody that would listen, I suspected the stories were bull, I'm not saying that he couldn't have been in Vietnam, he was about the right age but his stories didn't sound true not to mention that must of the Vietnam vets that I know only talk abot 'Nam with other 'Nam vets. Besides he was such a jerk that I doubt that he would have made it trough his first patrol.

Rick

Take nothing but pictures Leave nothing but footprints

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use