Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Acknowledges Back Injury From 1969. C&p Coming.

Rate this question


Papa

Question

About two months ago I got this generic letter from the Houston RO informing me that an exam with QTC was being set up to see what my current condition of my disability was. I had zero idea what disability and/or exam they were talking about. QTC was puzzled since I was not in their system, but told them that the VA had informed me that they have sent all my medical records to the QTC Doctor that would be doing the exam. QTC said that was impossible, so I let it go. I called the Case Management people in DC, and the following week got a call from the Houston RO that told me that the exam was for my Back and related issues. I then received a letter informing me that they need medical records from my foot doctor, and they specified him by name. So, how could they not already have this info, if they knew his name, but that is beside the point. What is strange is that in the past, I was given the Alemda St. address in Houston to send documents of any type. However, this time, I was given a PO Box to send it to.

The person that I talked to at the VA said the exam was a good thing as they now see that I, in fact, did injure my back in 1969, while in the service, and have had continous issues with it.

I have had several claims for my back starting in the early 70s for my back, but was always denied. The VA would always deny based on my Back was not injured while in the military. It has taken them over 40 years for them to finally see in my SMC that I injured my Back. This will be my first physical for my Back. My Pain Management Doctor had told me that it would be hard to compare my latest MRI for my Back to when it was injured, since the AF Doctors did no Xrays, no meds, nada. So, since, I did not have Xrays done back then, am I screwed, or will I come under benefit the doubt?

Papa

Edited by Papa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I hope for the best Papa, It's about time dam'it!!

They will try to bleed us to death!!mad.gif

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Papa

I don't think you are screwed. I think you should stay on this case since the VA admits you were injured in service. They admit you have had continuous issues with your back over the years. Get your foot in the door even if they only rate you 10%. Do not give up on this regardless of whatever some VA doctor might say. They don't make the ratings. I would do anything to win this claim including hiring Perry Mason.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have already run into some issues, The VA sent me a letter wanting information from a Foot Doctor by June 23rd. I sent that yesterday, receipt, of course. Today, I got my QTC c&p notice for an exam on June 11th. The exam states that the VA wants the following conditions examined: lower back, right and left knees. It also states "claim type" reopen. Does this mean when I first put a claim in?

Also, when I talked to the VA in Houston, I told them that my last two "Doctors" did not meet my expectations. He told me that an Orthopedic Specialist would do the exam. Well, the Doctor that will be doing the exam is a GP, family practice. She got her medical degree from Mexico. She lives in Del Rio, Texas. That is a very long drive. My PD examiner, also a GP, was from north of Midland, Texas. Where the hell does QTC find these people? San Antonio has 1.5 million people, and they can not find a Doctor here? Has anyone ever challenged an exam based upon a Doctor's lack of experience in a particular area? She may be great.

I have K&K as my Lawyers, and will send them a copy of the QTC notice, and the forms that I will need to fill out. Filling out the form will be hard, since, I have PD.

Papa

Edited by Papa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

K&K knows that you made claims in the 70's but were denied because SMR's were not available? It is not like you are reopening this claim with new evidence that was just generated. The evidence was there all along but just not part of the ratings. I bet the VA is going to try and say your effective date will be 2012 and not 1970 something. They are going to pretend the claims in the 70's never happened. You know what I mean in order not to pay retro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been trying to fill out this QTC medical form. They want a ton of info, but only gives you a small space. I thought about added an attachment, but thought they would "misplace" it. Another thing that is troubling is that my PD really keeps me from writing, I now squibble. I have until June 11th to have this completed, and got it yesterday. Has anyone NOD due to the person performing an exam was not qualified in the area of the exam being performed? Just wondering.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Papa

Focus on the QTC exam! Sribble if you have to scribble, but get it done and get to that exam. I know your are pissed off and nervous but the exam is the thing. Do the best you can with the exam paperwork but get to that exam come hell or high water.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use