Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Eligible For Smc After Favorable Appeal ?

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Wondering if anyone can answer this:

Viet Nam Vet. Filed for SC prostate cancer February 2008. Filed for ptsd August 2008. Subsequently received 60% for prostate cancer residuals ( urinary problems ), and 50% for ptsd January 2010. I was given TDIU in October 2012 for a combination of both conditions.

I had NOD'ed the ptsd within the 1 year limit and I have every reason to believe it will be increased to 70%.

My question, in light of Bradley vs Peake and the other court cases is this: If the ptsd is raised to 70% effective August 2008, when I first claimed, and the 70% rating would by itself be enough for a TDUI rating effective August 2008, then would I be eligible for SMC(s) because I have a separate 60% rating.

It seems to satisfy the requirements, the only wierd thing is that I already have TDIU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think you might need the total % rating you got when you got TDIU plus 60%, but I am not sure. I got TDIU at 70% for a single disability and then got an extra 60% a few years later. I got SMC S via Bradley V Peake, but I was already total and then got 60%. What is your actual rating right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now, it is 100% TDIU P&T with no future exams scheduled. It's based on 60% cancer residuals (AO), and 50% Ptsd. Combined with VA math I'm at a true 80%. Also got SSDI in the fall of 2011.

I'm certain the ptsd will be raised to 70% and should be effective Aug 2008, so ostensibly the TDIU would have been generated then, making me eligible for TDIU in Aug 2008. The separate 60% was just awarded in Oct 2012, increased from 40%.

Seems like I meet the standard for SMC (s) as of Oct 2012 if I get the ptsd increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Right now, it is 100% TDIU P&T with no future exams scheduled. It's based on 60% cancer residuals (AO), and 50% Ptsd. Combined with VA math I'm at a true 80%. Also got SSDI in the fall of 2011.

I'm certain the ptsd will be raised to 70% and should be effective Aug 2008, so ostensibly the TDIU would have been generated then, making me eligible for TDIU in Aug 2008. The separate 60% was just awarded in Oct 2012, increased from 40%.

Seems like I meet the standard for SMC (s) as of Oct 2012 if I get the ptsd increase.

I agree, you probably will, provided your PTSD is raised to 70%.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are not automatically awarded "S" when you get 70% for PTSD you may have to file a CUE using Bradley vs Peake. I got my "S" after I filed for it with two years retro because the VA did not grant S when they should have and never would have if I had not filed for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use