Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Exit Examination

Rate this question


SpcDearman

Question

hello Family,

i haven't posted in a while but have been constantly thinking about my denial. I want to thank everyone that finally convinced me to start thinking about an IMO. I am waiting on my medical records that were sent on 11-14-12. For some reason I have not received this and I am about 10 miles away. I have a question though.

I was wondering if a soldier HAS to have an exit examination upon separation.

Also, has anyone here had an exit examination and advised of all that was wrong and not have any physical done or xrays done before separation.

I ask due to wondering that since I explained all of my issues on my last day of service why there were no xrays done then.

Thanks for the responses.

dearmeat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Supposedly there is a requirement for an exit exam. Mainly, it's to "check the box", and preclude "unjustified" claims after exit.

The Navy did do an "exam" when I was released from active duty in the 60's.

Basically, if you made it to the exam without assistance, you passed.

The doctor (actually done by a doctor, no less) cautioned me up front that unresolved medical problems would cause a "medical hold", delaying separation for at least a month or so. At the time, I was recovering from an operation, incisions were only partially healed, and I wasn't supposed to lift "heavy" things. I guess a 75Lb or so sea bag didn't qualify as heavy.

Anyway, it was obvious that I would be better off in the short term by going back home, and using private doctors to deal with any real problems.

As I understand it, these days, the quality and thoroughness of the exam at various locations and by different examiners varies tremendously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never had an exit physical. Majority of RVN vets who were ETS'ing out of Nam did not have exit physicals I think.

From what I have been able to determine; the army and another branch started requiring this after 1994. i am attempting to find out why i wasn't given a physical upon exit. How can you deny a person saying his injury isn't service related when he complained about it BEFORE separation and was not given an exam when he complained about his shoulder upon separation. Seems as if the RO would say that the VA PCP's IMO is as least as likely if not Likely that this doctor is full of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposedly there is a requirement for an exit exam. Mainly, it's to "check the box", and preclude "unjustified" claims after exit.

The Navy did do an "exam" when I was released from active duty in the 60's.

Basically, if you made it to the exam without assistance, you passed.

The doctor (actually done by a doctor, no less) cautioned me up front that unresolved medical problems would cause a "medical hold", delaying separation for at least a month or so. At the time, I was recovering from an operation, incisions were only partially healed, and I wasn't supposed to lift "heavy" things. I guess a 75Lb or so sea bag didn't qualify as heavy.

Anyway, it was obvious that I would be better off in the short term by going back home, and using private doctors to deal with any real problems.

As I understand it, these days, the quality and thoroughness of the exam at various locations and by different examiners varies tremendously.

Exactly. this was so informal that I even questioned him about it. He did my exam in the hallway with quite a few other soldiers present. He just stood in front of me checking boxes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Chuck

They told Army guys the same thing about medical hold who were ETS'ing out of RVN. These guys have been away from home for at least a year and they want them to stay around for an extra 90 days or something for an exam. Of course, they said "Forget it and just let me go". This was a policy to cheat vets. The army had lots of ways to not document possible SC injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

In Naval Aviation we, a crowd of about 30 men getting out, were told to strip. I was one of them. One Doctor did the exam. He walked around the room, did the prostate exam, and asked us, as a group, if any of us had mental problems. Then he asked us if we had any other problems.

Of coarse everyone said no. There was not any privacy or detailed examination.

This was at Naval Air Station Lemoore, Calif. in 1971.

Edited by Stretch

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use