Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Letter From Cardiologist

Rate this question


bm6546

Question

After chatting with my cardiologist he agreed to write me a letter to submit to the VA.

"Brian is being followed in my medical practice for known coronary artery disease and more recently, for treatment of Paroxysmal Supraventicular Tachycardia. Brian underwent a successful PSVT ablation at Mercy General Hospital on 10/19/12. In spite of this recent intervention, he continues to experience occasional atrial arrhythmias and palpitations, which may continue indefinately. The ongoing use of Metoprolol will be effective in decreasing these symtoms, and it is my recommendation that he continue on Metoprolol.

As well, Clopidagrel (Plavix) as long term therapy for his known coronary artery disease as an antiplatelet agent is recommended."

He also filled out VA form 21-0960A-1 Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) Disabilty Benefits Questionnaire

1A. Does the veteran have Ischemic Heart Disease Yes

1B Diagnosis LXMI ICD code 412

1C CAD native vessel ICD code 414

1D PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) ICD code V45-82

2A Does the veteran's treatment plan include taking continuous medication for the diagnosed condition Yes

List medications prescribed for IHD related conditions

Clopidogrel, Metoprolol, Simvastatin

3A Does the veteran have CHF No

4A Has a diagnostic exercise test been conducted Yes

2/3/2012 12.5 Mets

5c Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) if known 65%

I also had my EP doctor who is also a cardiologist fill out the same form and sign it.

He also checked the box that I have Ischemic Heart Disease.

Diagnosis SVT ICD code 427.0

CAD ICD code 414.0

He also indicated that I need to take continuous medication.

He never checked the METS box.

I could not get him to write a letter for me.

I am hoping some of the Hadit people that have heart issues may be able to help me figure this one out and let me know if this will help me finally win my claim with the VA.

Please let me know if anyone has any questions. Any help would really be appreciated.

Thanks, Brian

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are an AO vet you should win. You don't have CHF which is a bugaboo for many vets. CHF can be secondary to DMII, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

After chatting with my cardiologist he agreed to write me a letter to submit to the VA.

"Brian is being followed in my medical practice for known coronary artery disease and more recently, for treatment of Paroxysmal Supraventicular Tachycardia. Brian underwent a successful PSVT ablation at Mercy General Hospital on 10/19/12. In spite of this recent intervention, he continues to experience occasional atrial arrhythmias and palpitations, which may continue indefinately. The ongoing use of Metoprolol will be effective in decreasing these symtoms, and it is my recommendation that he continue on Metoprolol.

As well, Clopidagrel (Plavix) as long term therapy for his known coronary artery disease as an antiplatelet agent is recommended."

He also filled out VA form 21-0960A-1 Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) Disabilty Benefits Questionnaire

1A. Does the veteran have Ischemic Heart Disease Yes

1B Diagnosis LXMI ICD code 412

1C CAD native vessel ICD code 414

1D PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) ICD code V45-82

2A Does the veteran's treatment plan include taking continuous medication for the diagnosed condition Yes

List medications prescribed for IHD related conditions

Clopidogrel, Metoprolol, Simvastatin

3A Does the veteran have CHF No

4A Has a diagnostic exercise test been conducted Yes

2/3/2012 12.5 Mets

5c Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) if known 65%

I also had my EP doctor who is also a cardiologist fill out the same form and sign it.

He also checked the box that I have Ischemic Heart Disease.

Diagnosis SVT ICD code 427.0

CAD ICD code 414.0

He also indicated that I need to take continuous medication.

He never checked the METS box.

I could not get him to write a letter for me.

I am hoping some of the Hadit people that have heart issues may be able to help me figure this one out and let me know if this will help me finally win my claim with the VA.

Please let me know if anyone has any questions. Any help would really be appreciated.

Thanks, Brian

The LVEF of 65% is of concern. It may forestall compensation for IHF.

It's also a bit above average, and may actually be a symptom in itself.

I'd ask a cardiologist if it indicates something significant.

Perhaps you should "Google" LVEF 65%

A short reference among many you might come across

"Heart failure with preserved left ventricular function (diastolic heart failure) occurs when the heart contracts normally, but the ventricles do not relax properly or are stiff and less blood enters the heart during normal filling. In this case, the ejection fraction may be normal."

A 12.5 METS is similar. That's actually a very high rating for most of us old timers.

A wild guess is that the average RO would, if other facts of the claim allow,

assign a low percentage. The other symptoms/conditions you mentioned might be better used to determine compensation.

Remember that the VA uses the thought that if you can work with the disability,

and it does not seriously impact "normal" life, it's not compensatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use