Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Is Va Trying To Screw Me Again

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

I have had an appeal pending at Houston RO since Feb 2010. I keep checking ebenefits to check the status. Until last week it had no movement at all, still stuck at the Regional office. I called last week and inquired on the status and was told Houston is so backlogged it takes two plus years to get it to the BVA. Late last nite I checked ebenefits again and it had two new entries. One entry said SOC 6/1/2012 and the other entry said Form 9 6/11/2012.. I never received either item. I tried to initiate an ebenefits email inquiry, but it kept rejecting my question saying my SSAN was in use by another member. So today I called the va and inquired. I was told not only were these items mailed, but that my POA Texas Veterans had responded. First, I have no POA assigned as I do all my own work, secondly they are in my opinion the worst people to assign the POA. But more important, I have no idea how the Texas Veterans responded. The other problem is we only have 60 days to respond to the SOC and appeal although I thought I already done a form 9 and NOD two years ago. But now my understanding is I may be screwed because I did not get the SOC I could not respond...... any suggestions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hello Teac,

I was just thinking that if the VARO has made a mistake on your POV then you could have some real issues with timelines on some claims. If those claims have ended without you knowing about them then you may have some CUE issues and reopen because of it. And if the claims that were suspense dated to end without you knowing about it , will make a big difference on your other claims that were either decided or still moving in line to the next phase of adjudication. I could see a domino effect that could financially be a real mess and a paper chase.

And this is a big plus for the VAROs. They know that the longer they wait and postpone something , the longer the Veteran has to wait. How do they expect us to remember everything ???? we can't and neither can they. Just another tactic that works for them.

Also I noticed that your BVA wait has been nearly 2 years. Does that mean that the Wonderful Houston VARO has not "CERTIFIED IT to the BVA"??? I know they can sit on them and make decisions for NODs during that period but at some point the VARO has to move it on. Are you considering a Writ of Mandamus or could you??? Take care Teac and still plan on coming up there and will let you know too. NEVER GIVE UP . God Bless, C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Teac,

I was just thinking that if the VARO has made a mistake on your POV then you could have some real issues with timelines on some claims. If those claims have ended without you knowing about them then you may have some CUE issues and reopen because of it. And if the claims that were suspense dated to end without you knowing about it , will make a big difference on your other claims that were either decided or still moving in line to the next phase of adjudication. I could see a domino effect that could financially be a real mess and a paper chase.

And this is a big plus for the VAROs. They know that the longer they wait and postpone something , the longer the Veteran has to wait. How do they expect us to remember everything ???? we can't and neither can they. Just another tactic that works for them.

Also I noticed that your BVA wait has been nearly 2 years. Does that mean that the Wonderful Houston VARO has not "CERTIFIED IT to the BVA"??? I know they can sit on them and make decisions for NODs during that period but at some point the VARO has to move it on. Are you considering a Writ of Mandamus or could you??? Take care Teac and still plan on coming up there and will let you know too. NEVER GIVE UP . God Bless, C.C.

Correct the Houston Regional Office has taken no action and still has not fowarded it to the BVA. A writ.. I don't know simply because I don't think it is applicable until it reaches the BVA or court... I do know that I will be looking for a Pro Bono Lawyer from the Veterans Consortium , they handled my last claim at Court of Veterans Appeals in 2007 and were able to make a deal ( taht benefited me) prior to a court date being set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use