Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veteran's Disability Compensation

Rate this question


meghp0405

Question

I found out some information concerning HR 303. This is the bill that would allow full payment of both military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation for disabled veterans' eligible for both payments (those veterans' that are 40% or less) This is the 14th time that HR (House Resoultion) 303 has been the number for the Retired Pay Restoration Act, which addresses an offset only partly eliminated by changes in law over the past decade.

This bill submitted by Representative Gus Bilirakis, R-FL, has been a strong and consistent supporter of this resoultion. Obtaining support from other Representatives has been difficult. Only 74 members of the House has signed on as co-sponsors so far. This Resoultion needs 218 sponsors (votes) to pass this bill through the House.

The number of supporters have declined the past couple of years.

I believe that, we as veterans' need to contact our Representative in the House and ask if he/she is not a supporter, why?

This is the last year of the phase in period for the concurrent pay issue for those veterans' 50% and above. By January 1, 2014, all military retired veterans who are 50% and above will start seeing their full retirement and their award from VA.

We now have to fight for those retirees that are 40% and below. There is no reason why they shouldn't be entitled to both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

You are absolutely right and I have already done just that. If you go to POPVOX.com you can look up any bill and email your senator or rep. Here are some other bills in congress that are obviously just laying around. HR-186, S-260, HR-178, and HR-238. I don't remember the specifics of each but, they do cover vets and their dependents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found out some information concerning HR 303. This is the bill that would allow full payment of both military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation for disabled veterans' eligible for both payments (those veterans' that are 40% or less) This is the 14th time that HR (House Resoultion) 303 has been the number for the Retired Pay Restoration Act, which addresses an offset only partly eliminated by changes in law over the past decade.

This bill submitted by Representative Gus Bilirakis, R-FL, has been a strong and consistent supporter of this resoultion. Obtaining support from other Representatives has been difficult. Only 74 members of the House has signed on as co-sponsors so far. This Resoultion needs 218 sponsors (votes) to pass this bill through the House.

The number of supporters have declined the past couple of years.

I believe that, we as veterans' need to contact our Representative in the House and ask if he/she is not a supporter, why?

This is the last year of the phase in period for the concurrent pay issue for those veterans' 50% and above. By January 1, 2014, all military retired veterans who are 50% and above will start seeing their full retirement and their award from VA.

We now have to fight for those retirees that are 40% and below. There is no reason why they shouldn't be entitled to both.

I think you failed to mention that current receipt does not apply to chapter 61 retirees under 20 years of service..... concurrent receipt or some kind of it went into effect in in 2000. Since then everyone said its coming for you guys too (chapter 61).. and we are still waiting.. As always someone in the government continues to put veterans in different classes. Is there any wonder why veterans don't vote as a block .. ( especially retired veterans).. and is it any wonder why it is so hard to keep up with what is coming and what has gone.. I am at the point that I really don't care about concurrent receipt anymore.... every year or so its the same crap, write your congress critters to support the bill, well many of us have written until we have writers cramps and ran out of ink.... and frankly writing again isn't going to accomplish anything.. but go ahead and write to your congress critters if you have a mind too.. I hate to be negative, It won't help, but it can't hurt....

Edited by Teac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They only withhold 5.00 for me. And I am receiving retired military pay and rated at 70%!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am retired Army, with over 20 plus years of active duty. I receive both my DOD/VA payments.

I am at 90% Service and VA connected, and DFAS only deducts $1.00 for VA waiver from my Military Retirement Check

and I get my complete VA Disability Payment minus my pending Dependents Pay which is still pending plus a few deferred medical issues.

Good luck to all my brothers and sisters that are at still waiting on their claims to be completed to include myself.

God Bless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aggie54 and coolbreeze

You are both rated over 50% that is why you are getting both. If you were rated at 40% they would deduct the 40% out of your retirement pay. HR-303 would restore that deduction. This deduction came about in the late 1890's when we were at war with Spain and the country was in financial trouble (like now). Some people call this a veterans tax because they pay you X for being disabled and then take it back from your retirement pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say it but you guys just proved my point... No one gives a darn about a chapter 61 retiree when it comes to this issue.. Ironically, TERA retirees ( less than 20 years. but over 15 years service) elected to retire before 20 because they couldn't get promoted and the Military was over strength.... and they are entitled to concurrent receipt just like the 20 year + retiree..... Chapter 61 retirees however in most cases were forced into retirement..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use