Can someone tell me what some of this means. I got this in the mail 2 days ago.
Order
Entitlement to service connection for headaches as secondary to service-connected hypertensive cardiovascular disease is granted.
Remand
The board remands the veteran's claim of entitlement to TDIU. This decision grants secondary service connection for headaches. The issue of TDIU is enextricably intertwined with the issue of the assignment of a disability rating for the veteran's now serviced-connected headaches. Thus, the issue of TDIU must be remanded to be re-adjudicated at the same time that a disability rating is assigned for the veteran's headaches.
Accordingly, the case is Remanded for the following action:
1. Provide the veteran with VCAA notice that is compliant with the current notice requirements as to the establishment of disability ratings and effective dates.
2. After assigning a disability rating for the veteran's headaches, readjudicate the veteran's claim for entitlement to a TDIU. If such action does not resolve the claim, a Supplemental Statement of the Case should be issued to the veteran and her representative. An appropriate period of time should be allowed for response. Thereafter, this claim should be returned to this Board for furthur appellate review, if in order.
I do not understand about the remand or remanded things. I do not understand about the TDIU and what they are saying about it. Please help.
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
Question
Dorothy
Can someone tell me what some of this means. I got this in the mail 2 days ago.
Order
Entitlement to service connection for headaches as secondary to service-connected hypertensive cardiovascular disease is granted.
Remand
The board remands the veteran's claim of entitlement to TDIU. This decision grants secondary service connection for headaches. The issue of TDIU is enextricably intertwined with the issue of the assignment of a disability rating for the veteran's now serviced-connected headaches. Thus, the issue of TDIU must be remanded to be re-adjudicated at the same time that a disability rating is assigned for the veteran's headaches.
Accordingly, the case is Remanded for the following action:
1. Provide the veteran with VCAA notice that is compliant with the current notice requirements as to the establishment of disability ratings and effective dates.
2. After assigning a disability rating for the veteran's headaches, readjudicate the veteran's claim for entitlement to a TDIU. If such action does not resolve the claim, a Supplemental Statement of the Case should be issued to the veteran and her representative. An appropriate period of time should be allowed for response. Thereafter, this claim should be returned to this Board for furthur appellate review, if in order.
I do not understand about the remand or remanded things. I do not understand about the TDIU and what they are saying about it. Please help.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
5
3
1
Popular Days
Aug 15
10
Aug 14
1
Top Posters For This Question
Dorothy 5 posts
vaf 3 posts
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
Aug 15 2006
10 posts
Aug 14 2006
1 post
10 answers to this question
Recommended Posts