Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Help With Ihd Dic Claim


KHJH

Question

My husband died Nov 2006 from Cardio Pulmonary Arrest. I found out about 9 months ago that IHD was made presumptive to Agent Orange so I filed a claim for DIC.

I received a letter from VA that states "We need additional evidence from you"

During the veterans Lifetime, service connection was established for post traumatic stress disorder, chronic lumbar strain with painful left hip, and chondromalacia left knee. Service connection was not considered for Cardio Pulmonary Arrest. In order to support your claim, you need to submit evidence that shows a disability was incurred or aggravated during service and was the primary or contributory cause of death.

We will request medical records from any VA facility that treated the veteran.

If a private physician or facility has treated the veteran, we may be able to request these records on your behalf.

I sent the VA Medical Records from St. Mary's Hospital in 1990 where my husband had a heart attack a quadruple bypass. His diagnosis was: Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease with Angina. His EKG report states: Consider Lateral Ischemia. The VA doesn't acknowledge these records in their list of what they have received.

I also sent them Medical Records From the VA Hospital

EKG report on 5-23-2003 states: Consider Lateral Ischemia

EKG Report on 10-29-2004 states: Consider anterolateral ischemia

EKG report on 5-23-2005 states: Consider anterior ischemia

EKG Report on 3-13-2006 states: abnormal ECG

EKG Report on 10-18-2006 states: Inferior infarct 2006 ?

VA medical reports 10-2-2001 : Ischemic Heart Disease, CAD/CHF, Angina

VA medical reports 12-2-2003 : Ischemic Heart Disease, CAD/CHF

VA medical records 4-18-2006 : Congestive heart Failure, Angina Coronary Artherosclerosis, coronary bypass

VA medical records 10-23-2006: CAD/CHF

VA medical records 11-5-2006: CAD

VA Medical records From the ER and hospital stay on the day he died.

Death certificate stating cause of death as Cardio Pulmonary Arrest

VA Hospital Autopsy Report

Then the letter states: We may consider that the veteran's cardio pulmonary arrest is associated with dioxin exposure if you send us scientific or medical evidence showing that the veteran's claimed condition is medically associated with dioxin exposures.

If a doctor expressed an opinion regarding the relationship of the veteran's condition to dioxin exposure, send us that opinion, the reasons and bases for that opinion, and the clinical treatment records. In addition, the doctor should provide literature that supports the opinion. Literature may consist of scientific or medical journal articles, etc., that supports the doctor's opinion that the veteran's exposure was related to the veterans diagnosed condition.

I don' know who to contact for a medical opinion and don't think I have enough time. I have until June 14th to send in additional information.

Also stated in the VA Letter (which really upset me)

Evidence of record indicates that you and the veteran did not live together continuously. Therefore we need statements from you and two other persons, with the following:

All dates and places where you and the veteran lived during any period of separation prior to the veteran's death. Include a statement explaining why each separation occurred. If there was a written agreement or court order of separation, please send up a copy.

A statement if whether or not you and the veteran intended to again live together.

Any attempts you or the veteran made to resolve or settle your problems

The amounts and dates of the veteran's contribution to your support during each separation.

Did you or the veteran ever apply for divorce or annulment? If so, give the date and results of the court action and furnish a copy of the divorce decree, if any.

Not sure where this came from. My husband and I were married for 30 years and were never separated. We lived in the same household for 30 years.

Not sure what to do now. I sure would appreciate any advice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

No, Ischemia isn't mentioned in his autopsy report but it is listed in his medical records that I sent VA.

yes, I also posted on VBN. I've spent a lot of time on VBN and Hadit researching DIC claims.

Thanks for the links you posted. They will be very helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"No, Ischemia isn't mentioned in his autopsy report but it is listed in his medical records that I sent VA."

Good ......because that exact word is what VA is familiar with seeing for IHD claims.

For some of my claims I often copied and then highlighted with a magic marker, specific medical entries from my husband's VA medical records, in support of my claims and listed those records as evidence by date with my other submissions.

It looked to me that the VA ,based on your post, had not acknowledged the private records at all.

It is imperative that they acknowledge them as evidence, even if you have to send them again.

If I were you I would use the IRIS VA system, available at www.va.gov , it is the "Contact Us" link, and ask them to acknowledge if they have received all of your evidence, to include the autopsy, as well as all VA medical records and the med recs from St Mary's hospital.

I always ask for an email response because they can say anything in a phone call response , and there is no hard copy proof of what they say,unless you ask for email or snail mail response.

And mention exactly what you have sent to them on the Response form for the VCAA letter.

I have been a VA claimant for about 16 or 17 years.

It amazes me how, as all of my claims reveal, the VA would say they never got the most important evidence I had sent.

This has happened to many claimants here as well.

We have to keep on them,if they ignore any of our evidence.

.

.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The only thing you need is atherosclerosis listed in the Autopsy.

They are playing games with you.

Do you have a VSO?

You may need an attorney.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would consider getting a lawyer. Why the VA plays these games is just cruel and inhuman. They think they can discourage you. Your claim should be a slam/dunk for presumptive AO of IHD.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use