Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How To Find Regulations From 1970S?

Rate this question


bigred1

Question

I am looking for the regulations on how the VA was supposed to handle a claim for benefits in the 1970s. I have a family member who I am helping with his appeal. He submitted a claim after he was hospitalized in the mid 1970s after an attempted suicide for depression. He was denied based on lack of service connection. The hospitalization was about 5 years after his 2 year tour in Vietnam. The hospital records in the cfile state a sentence from the doctor that he was experiencing depression since his time in Vietnam.

Where can I find regs of how they should have handled his claim back then?

Should they have considered that statement?

He was in the hospital for about 2 months for depression.

Thank you for any advice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Good question. I had trouble finding some of the policies used during the 1990's. I am about to help a friend who served in Vietnam and if you find out anything then it would be a big help to me, as well as others.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PTSD, as a defined illness, was not recognized until 1981 by VA. As such, any MDD you suffered prior to that was most often diagnosed as a personality disorder. Given that he was hospitalized for several months, this bodes well for a contention that it was an implied or "informal claim" and VA should have recognized it for that. If you were stark raving bugf***ky when you came back or required some downtime at a VAMC, chances are it was more than obsessive compulsive disorder or antisocial personality with passive aggressive tendencies. VA will fight you tooth and nail on it. When (and if) you win on appeal they'll give you a retrospective staged rating (Fenderson) and 0% you out to the present. It's a long hard road and one that will entail an attorney down the road. Letting a VSO drive this claim is not advised. Be prepared for over a decade of litigation. The nice thing is there will only be fits and spurts of legal filing interspersed with years of inaction. Plenty of time to remodel the kitchen and build a life size replica of the Eiffel Tower with matchsticks in your spare time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Asknod

If this vet had of had his breakdown within a year of discharge he probably would have been SC'ed for something. You are so right about the personality disorder jive. I did get SC in 1973 for schizophrenia and a personality disorder, of course. I did not have schizophrenia. I had dissociative disorder which is close to PTSD and has many of the same symptoms and causes. I was lucky to get any SC considering the way my claim was worked. The VA just excluded my private doctor's evidence and used the VA doctor's notes. During the Vietnam War and in the years before PTSD was recognized you had to be stark, raving mad at the time of discharge to get a high rating. Even then if you got better by the time you saw a VA shrink you would get "PD", social misfit, drunk, anti-social PD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The breakdown was about 5 years after his return home. He tried to committ suicide and was taken to the VA, was there for 2 months. While there he submitted a claim for nervous condition, but was denied stating "the service medical records are negative for anything referable to the currently claimed disabilities." and also states "veteran has submitted no medical evidence referable to either of the claimed conditions." and "Nervous and earache conditions--claimed by veteran not shown by the evidence of the record"

We just found additionaly records obtained by his persistence, not by the VA, from st. Louis. Found a form 10 7131 from the adjutication officer requesting a few things, like hospital summary and special report (not exactly sure what that is yet) I put a request into the VA for an explanation. But 20 days later, they denied his claim....clearly not enough time to receive the records from the VA Hospital. In the cfile there were 2 discharge summaries it looks like they got it about 5 or 6 months after they denied him. They didn't do anything to reopen the claim or to inform him of it or anything.

He did apply again in 1985 but he failed to show up to the medical exam (can that hurt us?)

He applied again in 2011, rated 30% for ptsd

Applied for increase, got 70% earlier this year.

We are trying to get TDIU (I think we will succeed on this soon) and Earlier effective date. Which I know is really difficult, but we are prepared to fight it.

Thanks for any insight or advice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

His hospitalization could be treated as an informal claim for benefits. I wonder if the VA did not commit some kind of CUE when they denied his orginal claim. I think you should hire a lawyer and let him review his entire C-File and medical records. Because their is some kind of chance at a earlier effective date, and TDIU, the lawyer might want to take the case since he gets 20% of any retro money. Phil and AskNod have both said it is a long road. It will be even longer without expert help. I have a CUE going back to my discharge rating and that was 1971. I have a lawyer working on it because it has been very frustrating as you can imagine. The VA broke every rule in the book on my original claim, but what did I know? As far as TDIU if he can't work due to SC condition that is definition of TDIU. Has he applied for SSDI?

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use