Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Questions About Award Date

Rate this question


draggin'swife

Question

OK, we (me and hubby) put in a legitimate NOD (within the proper time limit) disagreeing with the rating amount for his PTSD- stating that his condition warranted a higher rating than the original rating. At the same time, sent an application for TDIU based on PTSD.

Thankfully, hubby was awarded a PTSD increase and TDIU on the same “award date”. This date was the date the TDIU paperwork was received. Our issue with this is that PTSD was on our original paperwork and was awarded a long time ago. Shouldn’t the award date for the PTSD increase go all the way back to the original date of award on the PTSD? Why in the world was the award date based on the receipt date of the NOD?

Also, the paperwork said that the date of TDIU award was based on the award date of the PTSD increase. (This could be a mistake for them to word it this way LOL) I realize that if the PTSD award date is wrong, this automatically makes the TDIU date wrong as well…but let’s ignore that for a moment. The date that he was unable to work was at least a year before the award date. Shouldn’t the TDIU award date go back to the date of provable unemployability?

We will be making an appeal/NOD (whichever is appropriate here), but not sure what dates to fight for.

Don’t get me wrong we’re thankful for this…but are we getting screwed here?

Draggin’Wife

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

You filed a claim for IU which really is not a claim but an ancillary benefit. The date you filed IU was actually treated as a claim for increase.

The filing date was the effective date. That sums it up dont it.

I see this a lot. Vet files a claim gets low balled, NOD's and gets IU awarded. Effective date is date claim was filed because they saw it fit to send for a C and P exam to establish a baseline or time point showing the condition was worsened. That is the old bait and switch. You may need to bring the old legal beagles into the mix.

Does he get SSDI? If so is it based on his service connected issues?

Get an attorney. You are going to need one. I feel bad that you have to deal with Houston or Waco. These places are a major league mess right now.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a little confused here, like you are...

“Shouldn’t the award date for the PTSD increase go all the way back to the original date of award on the PTSD? “

Yes, but only If the medical evidence of record at that time warranted the increase (and claim was continuously prosecuted after the initial award.

“Why in the world was the award date based on the receipt date of the NOD? “

You sure got me there....

“The date that he was unable to work was at least a year before the award date. Shouldn’t the TDIU award date go back to the date of provable unemployability? “

You stated:

“Yes he gets SSDI based on his PTSD. He was awarded SSDI before the NOD and TDIU were filed. “

It should go this way:

An SSDI award Solely for PTSD in your husband's case, that preceeded the TDIU award, by at least a year SHOULD warrant a possible additional retro payment.

I always use my husband's claim as example.

1983 30% SC PTSD.

1992 SSDI solely for a NSC 1151 stroke EED Aug 1992

1993 ,upon Reconsideration of their award, SSDI awarded

SSDI solely for PTSD, EED Nov 1991.

Rod filed his claim for higher PTSD rating in mid 1992 ,his 1151 claim in 1994, and then the TDIU form in or around fall of 1992.

VA stated his EED of Nov 1991 was the last day he was unemployable solely due to SC PTSD ,per his SSA award,retro to Nov 1991.

(although the SSA only had His VA med recs, the SSA provides,in essense an Independent Medical Opinion for SSDI claims)

With 2 SSA awards it was a little confusing for VA, and they didn't even get his SSA records for many many months. He was dead by time of the 100% P & T for PTSD posthumous decision as they cant award TDIU to a dead veteran.

I supported his claim with evidence in addition to the PTSD SSA award from Voc Rehab, Dept of Labor, etc etc but this is why jbasser asked you if he gets SSDI. Solely for his PTSD.

Was the VA aware of ( it is Question # 18 on the TDIU form)

the fact that he received SSDI Solely for his PTSD during the processing of his claim?

Did they in fact send him 21-22s or any other type of authorization forms in order to get the SSA records?

If VA was aware of those records, did they list the as Evidence in the decision?

If so, what exactly did VA say as to why they did not consider them properly?

If VA did not obtain those records ,with full knowledge from the veteran that they existed and/or if VA did not consider the SSDI records as evidence for a proper EED, the VA has committed a Clear and Unmistakable Error(CUE) under 38 CFR.4.6.

Can you scan and attach (cover identifying personal stuff..name, address. C file number) the Reasons and Bases part of the decision and the Evidence list it contained?

I am baffled as to the NOD date becoming the EED.

I griped a little with my Nehmer NVLSP lawyer over an EED on my AO IHD death claim.

But then I obtained the VA exam that supported the EED the VA used and could understand VA's rationale better. (I had never seen that specific exam in the med recs before)

There could be some good reason for the NOD date being the EED they gave your husband.....but we could help more on that if we can read their actual reasoning in the decision.

Fairly recently here I posted the M21-1MR regs on the EED for TDIU claims, when affected by a prior SSA award solely for SC.

That can be searched for here under our hadit search feature.

Does any vet org hold your husband's POA?

As I mentioned here many times before..... (everything that could go poossibly go wrong with my husband's claims and med care ,did go wrong.As a VA claimant as his widow, I found things even got worse ,but all that gave me a lot of first and experience in how to make sure things Dont go wrong.. My husband always blamed it on the Billboard...)

If you tell VA you get SSDI solely for your SC(s) they need to send you authorizations forms (I think these forms are at the VA web site as well,) sign them ,copy them and send them back to VA with a proof of mailing and address them Attention to: and use the Initials in the initial/numeric code on the letter from VA that requested them.

THEN FOLLOW UP on whether or not VA is making any attempt to get them!

Check directly with the SSA,even if VA says they are attempting to get them....

I already rattled off here the extraordinary broohaha my husband went through on his SSA records.with the VA.

He did have two separate SSA awards and I spelled that all out for them as if they were 10 years old.

But hat wasn't really the problem at all. My husband could have seen his 100% ( or TDIU award) in his lifetime if the VA had not made continual screw ups by failing to even attempt to get those records.

I remain as ticked off on all that today as I was 20 years ago. I hope that BS never happens to any other veteran.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

The effective date is the later of the date of claim or the "facts found", that is, the date the doc said

were unemployable. There are some key exceptions to this general rule, which may help you win an earlier date:

1. Reopening the claim due to N and M evidence, such as under 38 CFR 3.156.

2. CUE

3. If you applied for benefits within a year of your discharge.

4. If you asked for an increase within a year of your application for benfits.

5. "Notice" violations.

Read this and see if it applies to you:

http://www.purpleheart.org/ServiceProgram/Training2011/W-2%20Common%20VA%20Effective%20Date%20ErrorsL.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use