Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

**tidbit**-Claims Development Info

Rate this question


harleyman

Question

I thought I would share the following which explains why files bounce around sometimes. This is just an FYI - Harleyman

TIDBIT: Who ever touches the file LAST, is the person charged with an error against them, if there is an error in the file. So if an RVSR makes a mistake and the person processing the RVSRs decision, misses the mistake, and the award is processed with an error by mistake, the person who processed the decision is charged with an error. The fact is the mistake is charged to the last person who touched the file. In ths case it would be the VSR who processed the award, not the RVSR who made an error in the decision.

That is why you see files go in and out of development and ready for decision, and authorization, back and forth as issues are found not developed properly, or a decision, is not written correctly, or records were suppose to be requested but weren't. Tons of reasons to return files for corrections. No one wants errors, and have their job standard showing quality problems, just to be put on a PIP (performance improvement plan". So usually back and forth movement of a file is good as it means things are being researched and errors corrected,- IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Interesting, Harleyman, and most certainly true. I have often said that VA's problems are management problems, not the fault of a single or even a group of employees. Great managers understand that it is about fixing the problem, and not fixing the blame. A great manager can get the best out of his help..in part, by leading with excellence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upper management at the VA are not necessarily great leaders or managers. It appears the VA is good about promoting within, but just because a person can rate a claim does not mean the same person can lead a team and manage the work force. One of the biggest problems at VA is morale. Not only are many of the employees Veterans themselves, but they also have claims pending that are not processed properly, and their claims are not accessable, because the pending claims for employees are sent out of the area to a different RO. So in order for an employee to go to the RO to check on their claim, they have to drive all day to get to where thier claim is being processed, usually in another state.

Then with the negative news against the VA admistration and VA employees and the management theory of this is how we do it at this RO, even though it's done differently somewhere else, it gets discouraging with the lack of unification on the processes. Each RO has special projects, and pilot programs , etc. there is no consistancy. So morale is a real problem for the average employee. Top it off with the treats of PIPs (performance improvement plans), and reassignemnt for quality or performance, morale is a problem. Some employees are just tired of beig blamed for bad decisions made by management, who shouldn't be inmanagement as they have no people skills, and no prior mangement experience or training to be leaders of the work force, and shouldn't even be considered for the job in the first place. So yes, we have some benefits but it is not a glamorous job, to say the least, and it is very stressful as well. - IMHO

Please let me add, I want to help Veterans, I enjoy seeing the grants and sucess in a claim, I dislike denials, I am pro Veteran and I am grateful to be employed, That being said, the VA system, could use some input from the VA employees about the processess implemented in working claims. Also- IMHO

Edited by harleyman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some employees are just tired of beig blamed for bad decisions made by management, who shouldn't be inmanagement as they have no people skills, and no prior mangement experience or training to be leaders of the work force, and shouldn't even be considered for the job in the first place.

Personally, I have dealt with a couple of DRO's - that I feel should NOT BE TEACHING lower level

employees, because these couple of DRO's did NOT know their JOB RESPONSIBILITIES or

38 CFR / 38 USC, well enough, to be instructing other's.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use