Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question About Filing Additional Claim Before 1 Year After Discharge Timeframe

Rate this question


289mustang

Question

I hope I am posting this question in the correct forum. I retired from the Marine Corps with 34 years of service as a MGySgt Oct 2013. I filed a Before Discharge Claim through the Disabled Veterans in Sept 2013. Currently my claim is being processed through Salem-Winston with my C&P being completed during November 2013. I filed for 3 cervical postlaminectomy surgeries, R/L radiculpathy for arms/legs, Lumbar issues, along with a few other issues.

My question is concerning filing or when to file additional medical issues that I was diagnosed with after discharge. A few months after discharge I was diagnosed with right facial trigeminal with pain, moderate sleep apnea requiring CPAC machine, shoulder impingement both arms, chronic pain syndrome.

While on active duty it is documented in my medical records several times of "unable to sleep throughout night", "only getting "3-4 hours sleep per night", "trouble sleeping" and on final discharge medical "excessive snoring". I have "right facial pain, tingling" noted by 3 doctors/neurosurgeons and shoulder issues during C&P exam. I know I will need a nexus letter for apnea and my doctor will provide one stating my cervical surgery has caused obstructive sleeping requiring machine.

I am concerned if I wait till my original claim is complete I may miss the 1 year after discharge time frame to claim service related medical conditions or that it may delay my claim from being completed which has a possible completion date of sept 2015

Do I wait for original claim to be completed and possible miss the 1 year file date before I file an additional claim or initiate a claim now, your help is greatly appreciated!

I have provided this site to all members retiring from the Quantico area and other retired military members I run across, I thank you all for your great assistance that you provide to the entire military family!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Just like everyone else has said, definitely file those additional claims PRIOR to your 1 year from discharge . Yes, it will slow down your claim & maybe that's why your service rep advised against it. But even if it adds 6 months to a year now, that is WAY better than having to do an appeal later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I never cease to be amazed on how VSO's are sometimes "toxic" to your claim. Waiting to file another issue would be disastrous...you have a year from discharge to file, and, after that, your burden to prove the condition is service connected is increased.

Dont even think about waiting to file all your claims. The later you file..the later your effective date. It will cost you money taking his advice. Suggest to your VSO he waits to turn in his hours for pay until he gets paid next year. You need a better VSO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I would suggest waiting 10-11 months, then submitting your additional claim. You will still be within the one year for your effective date. Give your first claim a chance to work itself and get completed. I have assisted veterans that have been in the same situation as you explained. The VA combined their claims, took it out of the FDC process and made it a normal claim. Each VARO has their own time frame for adjudicating their claims.

I submitted over 625 fully developed claims last year on behalf of veterans. I have never seen any FDC go over 8 months long.

Again, I would seriously suggest you wait before submitting additional claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I would file everything NOW.

Keep in mind, people who file a FDC are releasing the VA from the requirement of assisting them in developing the evidence. I expect in another year to year-and-one-half we will start seeing some BVA decisions that address just what people gave up for that VA promise of expedited decision making.

Yes I am a skeptic and paranoid, They intended to gain something by offering this FDC option. The butchers bill will be due soon and I suspect veterans that were desperate for the VA to act will be getting to pay the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use