Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

30% For Ptsd And Why Not 50%

Rate this question


stebarbar

Question

I received 30% for ptsd in Feb 2013 and the used the GFA of 62 from 9/2012 and not the GFA of 55 they VA dr's have used for the last 19 months. The VA regional office said to get to 50% I would need these 6 things: flatten affect,panic attacks,difficulty understanding complex command ,impairment of short term memory,imparied judgment,disturbances of of motivation and mood and difficulty establishing social relationships. I have in the A psychiatrist flatten, panic attacks more than 2 times or more a week,disturbances in motivation and mood and difficulty in social relationships. this is all in the va doctors notes for the last 2 years. It seems they took most of the info from the 9/2012.The one mistake I made a the C&P was I tole the psychologist that she has all the info in the va medical files and I didn't recite what I already told the Psychologist and Psychiatrist. My mistake! I call the VFW VSO and she sounded like I would have to have all these and the GAF didn't mean much by the Va psychiatrist. She said to have the psychiatrist fill out form 21-0960p-2 or mental disorder disability questionnaire. Do you have meet all 6 things and is the VSO right. Thanks for yourhelp, Semper ps The VA dr's don't like to fill out the forms.

US Marine Corps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

the psychiatrist at va raised my bupar to 60mg p/day due to panic attacks 3 time a week and also raised pozac to 60 mg p/day for depression, Mood flat and numb.he states abnormal. Im appealing 30% ptsd and not sure if I should put 50% or 70% increase for ptsd. Im not sure If I should appeal. Thanks again from everyone for their help. Semper Fi

US Marine Corps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You need an IME/IMO! You will never get anywhere with the VA. Since you do have a rating for PTSD you can get an IME to say you are much worse than just 30%. This is the way the VA often does it. You have to work your way up to 70%-100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Would treatment records by va Psychiartrist and Psychologist from the past 2 years mean anything. They listed at least 3 of the problems.

US Marine Corps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Did the VA use your VA medical records in your 30% decision? Your C&P exam doctor does not make your rating. The VARO does. Did the VARO consider your VA medical records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I've been at 30% since 06, had a serious breakdown in 08 and filled for an increase and I was refused. I think the IME/IMO idea is great and I'm going to pursue that.

Thank you to all the Vietnam Veterans that forged the way against the VA so that us younger veterans aren't being bashed against the obstacles you destroyed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Jon

The IME route is the way I went from 30% to 70% TDIU. Without good IME's I would still be sitting at 30% even though I had SSD and all sorts of proof from Vet Center and VA Voc. Rehab. The VARO had decided that since I had been 30% for about ten years that was all I would ever get. I had enough proof for 100%, but I went for TDIU since I was pretty sure I could get it. However, I had to fight for that as well. To get a high rating for MH issues you have to demonstrate that you are off your rocker. Unless you are psychotic this is hard to do. I can't turn anxiety and depression on and off like a TV. PTSD and a lot of other MH problems show up in your life style. Not being able to hold a job, relationship problems etc. If the exam doctor wants you to hallucinate on demand or break down in tears I can't do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use