Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Grounds For Cue That Never Seem To Come Up.

Rate this question


63SIERRA

Question

rarely if ever, do I hear of or read of claims where the va has even considered aggravation of an existing illlness or injury. clearly its part of the 38 regs, but they seem to just skip right over it, and dont even acknowledge it. in all of my claims, not one time is aggravation of any conditions ever mentioned. This is a issue I thing we need to press the va on, when fighting back, and trying to win our claims. It may even result in CUE claims in many instances, especially those early claims where they simple state, that the condition was a congenital or developmental defect and they never consider the aggravation aspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Its almost the same as if I went into the army with a slight limp. I then get clipped by a deuce and a half, and it makes me limp really badly. they have to pay for that. they cant say , well being we think you had some kind of problem when you came into service, and it was made worse, you were shot to hell anyway so we aint comping you. it dont work like that. They checked me out from top to bottom, and gave me a clean bill of health., had me duck walk, stand one one foot, rub my tummy and chew bubblegum and all was good to go. They cant wait till u get injured then say,,, hmmm you have defects ,, thats what happened you defective bastard, no comp for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Remember this phrase. Only to the extent of the agravation.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA said at first that my anxiety, depression and PTSD was congenital because I had a personality disorder. I did not have anxiety, depression, PTSD and psychotic symptoms before I went to Vietnam. When I got back I was in a military hospital for 2 months due to these problems. The VA said I had a PD. Somehow I got lucky because they said I had schizophrenia as well and granted a 10% disability. So I went into the army in 1969 with no mental health issues and I came out with schizophrenia and an anti-social personality. It was all my fault. I just could not fly right. Bad genes I guess. However, with treatment that I paid for I improved enough to get a college degree which the VA then used against me to say I was a fraud. They tried to take the 10%away from me, but 15 years had gone by so they could not get away with it. I did not know then that the VA disability system was a criminal fraud itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Remember this phrase. Only to the extent of the agravation.

well heres the deal, I wasnt complaining of nerve pain, before the accident. So something had to shift enough in my spine, to cause that symptom. that in itself should have been plenty to award me. muscle spasms dont cause spinal nerve pain as the RO is trying to say. They dont send you to physical therapy for weeks, and put you on profile for a month for a little muscle spasm. They dont put you in a back brace for a week for a muscle spasm.

The screwed up 3 times, 1st time they didnt consider all of the evidence.

2nd time they denied evidence and said my back wasnt fractured and there was evidence it was, they just didnt know when

3rd time they said new and material evidence hadnt been submitted when it had/

so its clear that they just refuse to consider the evidence because they can see thsat this could go all the way back to 95. and it is going to go back to 95.

Edited by 63SIERRA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use