Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

All Veterans, Filing A Nod At The Last Minute.

Rate this question


pacmanx1

Question

  • Moderator

I just want to inform all veterans that filing a NOD at the last minute may hurt your claim. It seems to me that more and more VAROs are taking more then 21 days to get new correspondence in the VA system. I have seem that it is taking 60 to 90 days to get new evidence logged in. I know it takes time to get evidence to support your claims but don't wait. Lots of veterans are getting denial letters when they have submitted new evidence that seem to be lost in the mail or in the system.

Hope this helps.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

In my case, the RO is trying to say that the date they stamped the green return receipt card was the date the NOD was filed, not the postmark date per the CFR. I'd be all done if I hadn't sent it certified mail from the mail counter with a hand stamped postmark on the certified mail receipt itself along with the cash register slip. We're in the midst of getting this straighted out now.

curious did you cut it that close? was the post mark your expiration date for the NOD? To my knowledge they are to go by the post mark date. With evidence or any forms with suspense dates it is absolutely imperative that you send it certified, return receipt requested. They pull that crap all the time on so many people to include myself. It took me once to learn that lesson. It costs a little bit, however, it is a small price to pay to nail that crap they try to pull to the floor.

My suggestion is if you haven't done so already is to send them a copy of the return receipt along with the excerpt of the regulation, that will piss them off, however, it is the regulation, they can go suck an egg. :tongue:

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I would just never cut it that close on filing a NOD. If you are asking them to reconsider your claim don't wait for less than a month to file the NOD. I may have lost a few hundred thousand bucks for not filing a NOD on time and letting a claim become final. This was long ago and far away in a distant galaxy but it still affects me today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

curious did you cut it that close? was the post mark your expiration date for the NOD? To my knowledge they are to go by the post mark date. With evidence or any forms with suspense dates it is absolutely imperative that you send it certified, return receipt requested. They pull that crap all the time on so many people to include myself. It took me once to learn that lesson. It costs a little bit, however, it is a small price to pay to nail that crap they try to pull to the floor.

My suggestion is if you haven't done so already is to send them a copy of the return receipt along with the excerpt of the regulation, that will piss them off, however, it is the regulation, they can go suck an egg. :tongue:

I would just never cut it that close on filing a NOD. If you are asking them to reconsider your claim don't wait for less than a month to file the NOD. I may have lost a few hundred thousand bucks for not filing a NOD on time and letting a claim become final. This was long ago and far away in a distant galaxy but it still affects me today.

You both are quite wise. I wish I hadn't sent it that late - it was on the deadline. Between my SC conditions, Christmas, and an ongoing family crisis at the time, I simply ran out of time. I'd been trying to get to it for months. Also, however, I was hoping against the odds that the "reconsideration claim" I was talked into submitting would come through at the last minute. So I felt that I was trapped into having to submit the NOD in order to save the original claim date. In hindsight, I would have submitted a NOD rather than that other claim. But given the situation as it stood this past fall, I would have submitted it a couple of weeks before Christmas if I had to do over again.

At least I listened to some of the great advice here. The package was sent certified mail, return receipt requested. So I do have ample evidence that the NOD was submitted on time. And I've submitted this proof twice now. The NOD was lost somewhere in the system and in mid-March, learned through IRIS that it was never received. So I sent the NOD again with the proof of postmark. Then, earlier this month, I got a letter responding to one of the submissions (original one or the one in March, don't know which one). The RO claimed I'd submitted a statement in support of a claim rather than a NOD and that it was late anyway as "officially" logged in as received about two weeks after the deadline. "No, no, no!" I responded immediately and in writing (also sent certified mail....yeah, it costs a few bucks but it's like insurance). I pointed out that I had filed a NOD and even used the new version of the NOD form, sending them yet another copy. And I gave them another copy of my hand postmarked certified receipt while quoting 38 CFR 20.302(a) and 38 CFR 20.305(a) about the use of the postmark as the date filed (thanks again to a number of hadit folks who helped me quickly put together a response).

Edited by TiredCoastie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I had one misreading of the decision date and award date in my case. I was off by a couple of weeks but I caught the error in time. My second delay was trying to get my IMO/IME worked out. I am confident on my mailing however, certified return receipt requested. As I have the stamped receipt for proof they received it in time and the IME report will be sent this week. I know all too well of the distractions of life, they can cost you big time if you are not careful.

IRIS inquiries can be quite helpful, it's an electronic record that can be referenced when need be.

The VA is hating life right now. With all the inquiries and heads rolling they are going to be watching more carefully the crap they try to pull. Also Veterans are getting much wiser and are more serious of an adversary with technology, support sites and forums like Hadit. Knowledge is power. The willingness to fight to the end is another key.

Fight till your last breath!

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use