Can someone tell me in 2002 my stressor was verified for PTSD but claim was denied ,the RO negatively influenced the examiner decision by instructing the examiner to consider inconsistencies in my prior exam. I'm now 100% for PTSD but I'm appealing for a EED 2002 due to CUE . need some guidance my claim is with the DRO and I'm wondering was that the best way to go .
Question
DustyAO105
Can someone tell me in 2002 my stressor was verified for PTSD but claim was denied ,the RO negatively influenced the examiner decision by instructing the examiner to consider inconsistencies in my prior exam. I'm now 100% for PTSD but I'm appealing for a EED 2002 due to CUE . need some guidance my claim is with the DRO and I'm wondering was that the best way to go .
Edited by DustyAO105Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
3
1
1
Popular Days
Apr 19
9
Apr 22
1
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 3 posts
DustyAO105 3 posts
Philip Rogers 1 post
saints13 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 19 2015
9 posts
Apr 22 2015
1 post
Popular Posts
saints13
Just in my opinion and experience I think so. Every C&P exam I have had, the RO stated, It is at least likely as not for such and such condition. I believe that is a leading question especiall
Berta
I feel every vet who gets denials and then a subsequent award for the same SC that was denied, should go over their past denials very carefully. They could contain CUE. It just makes sense that ,w
Berta
I forgot to answer the question in your topic title Can the RO influence the C & P doctor? Yes they can and will if they think they can get away with it.I was victimized by that BS in 1996
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now