Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

My Va Claim

Rate this question


briandalegm

Question

I have a question which may seem a bit out there. I've noticed, in some forums, that vets have filed claims with an effective date of (for example) February 2014. However, when claim is approved, somehow it gets dated back to (for example) October 2013. One vet even suggested this may have been because of some 'informal claim' the vet made to the VA.

I filed a claim which was denied in 2008. I found supporting evidence just a few weeks ago and opened a new claim as suggested by a county VA rep. Is it a 'pipe-dream' to even think that, perhaps, my claim can be back-dated by the VA to 2008 with no action on my part which happened to the other vets?

Go FAST, Go HARD, Go Long.....or GO HOME!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

"I filed a claim which was denied in 2008. I found supporting evidence just a few weeks ago and opened a new claim as suggested by a county VA rep. Is it a 'pipe-dream' to even think that, perhaps, my claim can be back-dated by the VA to 2008 with no action on my part which happened to the other vets?"

Yes,in my opinion, no action on your part means nada action on VA's part.

We have significant information here at hadit under searchs regarding EEDs.

In 2008 they could have made an error that fails under 38 CFR 3.156 regs.

Or maybe they made a CUE.

Or maybe, regardless of the New Evidence ,they could still deny and not even re-open the claim, or maybe you would succeed and get the date of filing as the EED,in an award letter.

CUE (Clear and unmistakable error) also has much discussion here in the CUE forum and

38 CFR 1.356 also has been discussed here many times.

An SSA award can also favorably impact on an EED for TDIU and that is explained here too.

There are numerous reasons for establishing an EED that would not necessarily be the date of the claim.

You need to succeed on the re=opened claim however ,for any of it to matter.

Can you tell us more?

.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Maybe. If you get awarded benefits, at the wrong effective date, and you think it should be earlier, then run it by a lawyer or give more details and we will try to answer.

If you have "new and material evidence", then you may be able to "reopen" your claim and get an Earlier Effective date (EED). You can look up

38 CFR 3.156 and see if you think your evidence qualifies under this regulation.

As you pointed out there is also a regulation on Informal claims for increase, where you may also qualify for an EED. Informal claims are covered under 38 CFR 3.155.

If you get a decision awarding benefits, you can appeal the decision disputing the effective date. VA gets it wrong often.

Also, its quite possible your RO decision contains Clear Unmistakable Error, and you may get an EED for that. If you have the RO decision and want to post the "Reasons and bases" for your decision denying benefits, then someone may opine as to whether you have a CUE or not.

I had to laugh..when I posted this and read Berta's post..she said almost the same thing I did, except in different words. Her answer was a bit better than mine, as she included the part about SSA and unemployability, where I did not.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Just to add ...for the few here (I hope) who even need to file a Section1151, 38 USC claim.

In 2012 I filed a 1151 claim separate from my past 1151 awards.

After another BATTLE (I am so tired of battles) I was awarded a dew weeks ago , an EED of 1988...that is from 1988 to 1994, the date of my husband's death.

They dont want to pay me the retro and they might be correct, when they finally do my other pending claim correctly.

Their logic is sound to a point and I will file a NOD.....

They have already paid me ( 2012 decision ) 100% under 1151 and cannot pay additional accrued due to the 100% award.

That makes sense....to a point

BUT they still owe me about 16 month under the 1151 CUE I won, at 100% Plus SMC and dependents, so that means their decision not to pay me under the HBP 1151 retro doesn't make sense.

They could pay the HBP retro for those 16 months ot more they still owe me.

The HBP 1151 is only a 10% award for 6 years with 2 dependents..

I actually filed this after the main CUE claim, just to see how VA would handle this 1151 type of situation if it ever comes up here.

They handled it like all of my other claims (SNAFUed and FUBARed up the ying yangs.).....

When they properly finish and award my CUE claim, then their HBP denial of payment will be OK with me ( I think)

Just to mention again ( and again I hope NO ONE here ever goes through this scenario)

100% SC plus 100% Section 1151 for an additional independent disability equals in essence, 200%

They must pay both amounts .

I posted the M21=1MR and 38 CFR regs on that here somewhere, available under a hadit search.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use