Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Success - Va Does 180 On Reduction

Rate this topic


USMC_VET

Recommended Posts

Contacted my rater friend and she checked again after i inquired about the letter. they said the formal "claim" for the hearing has been closed so thats not happening at all. she said what probably happened is that the letter was created, the VSO got it first and then contacted the rater at the VARO i go through and thats what got this started. I do believe i was not being looked after.

Will let you all know when the official letter comes in

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Headache" is a vague term , that could be lumped into a TBI residual ,

but diagnosed Migraines can be rated.


"The Veteran has appealed the denial of a higher rating for migraines. The Veteran's disability has been evaluated under Diagnostic Code 8100, which provides as follows: A 50 percent rating for very frequent completely prostrating and prolonged attacks productive of severe economic inadaptability; a 30 percent evaluation for characteristic prostrating attacks occurring on an average once a month over the last several months; a 10 percent for characteristic prostrating attacks averaging one in 2 months over the last several months; and a 0 percent rating with less frequent attacks. 38 C.F.R. § 4.124a, Diagnostic Code 8100."


http://www.va.gov/vetapp12/Files2/1213528.txt

"Will let you all know when the official letter comes in"

Good, they might have committed CUE in the migraine decision.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my issue is with migraines....not a normal headache. i have had headaches and these are not them.

I have been on a medication since right after the decision roughly around the same time. i didnt like it, so they have changed it and now am on a couple new ones. MRI was good, no infarctions or noticeable issues. so they only thing i can think is from a tbi from the IED blast. the level II team at the VA said i did not have one since i had not passed out.

My issues after the IED was sever disorientation for a period of time right after the blast, people were yelling at me and i didnt hear them. i was ina slow motion state watching the dirt lift off my arm form the blast and was just staring at it. i finally came to and pushed through the ambush that had started right after the blast. I somewhat remember going into the platoons area that was right outside where we got hit. I dont remember much after that, by that i mean i forgot the week or so after. people tell me about what happened. i dont remember. I was naive and still pretty young, barely 21 when i got out so went into the va to register right after and they screened anyone from oif/oef who had checked the "i saw combat box". I feel like they did this right off the bat to help lay the foundation for denial of tbi by denying it for everyone there. They said (paraphrase) "Since you didnt pass out and go unconcious you dont have a TBI" so i took that as the truth at the time and did until recently.

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



TBI does not always result in a loss of consciousness:

"Traumatic Brain Injury Definition
The Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs (May
2007), by consensus, have defined traumatic brain injury (TBI) as any traumat­
ically induced structural injury and/or physiological disruption of brain function
as a result of an
external force
that is indicated by new onset or worsening of
at least one of the following clinical signs, immediately following the event:
1.
Any period of loss of or a decreased level of consciousness;
2.
Any loss of memory for events immediately before or after the injury;
3.
Any alteration in mental state at the time of the injury

(e.g., confusion, disorientation, slowed thinking);

4.
Neurological deficits (e.g., weakness, balance disturbance, praxis, pare­
sis/plegia, change in vision, other sensory alterations, aphasia.) that may
or may not be transient

5.
Intracranial lesion.
http://www.publichealth.va.gov/docs/vhi/traumatic-brain-injury-vhi.pdf "

I didnt see anything like this phrase in the redacted decision:

They said (paraphrase) "Since you didnt pass out and go unconcious you dont have a TBI"

and they did SC the migraines but not enough there to determine whether they committed a CUE or not.


Your SMRs and buddy statements could possible support a TBI claim but if the migraines are the only residual, the best thing you can do is see if they missed any evidence at all that would have garnered you a higher migraine rating.

They attributed the migraines to something but redacted decisions do not help us figure out anything VA awarded or denied.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The redacted portion was where the next sections started refarding proposal to reduce my ptsd. what was in the doc was all that was mentioned regarding the headaches

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use