Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

IG Report: VA Has Been Shredding Documents Needed for Veterans' Claims

Rate this question


gs106

Question

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I read about the VA Shredding the other day and started thinking about the number of times over recent years, that we hear about Postal Workers being found to have a 1/2 ton of mail in their house or in the trunk of their car. Forget about the Thieves wanting Gift Cards from Xmas Mail, just regular everyday mail deliveries.

When incompetent employees feel their overworked and unable to catch up, fearing a reprimand or worse, they do things to hide their incompetence. Add poor or lax supervision, the problem snowballs.

I don't believe a VA Rating Dept employee starts out to screw Vets, by shredding documents. Unlike private or government officials trying to hide malfeasant behavior.

Quite possibly, the VA employee is an example of the "Peter Principle," he/she has reached or been promoted to their "level of Incompetence." Add lack of or poor supervision, Vet Claims suffer.

Semjper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Now I'd say that's a CUE.

The VA should ask the veterans of these RO to  come forward and check their C-FILE anything missing  then VA should consider the veterans Records has been shredded   and give them veteran's an automatic 100%

jmo

.................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I 'd bet the VA Employee's don't get their own records shredded!,

They may have been told to shreead  but I can just about imangine if ts their records  They don't shread them.(Hell No)

The Veterans from these RO should go in check there C-file If their records are not there   FILE A COMPLAINT.

be a good time to do that.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This is one reason I always tell 1151 or FTCAers to get an IMO and then get a lawyer Buck.

I had no IMO nor any lawyer when I won my FTCA and Sec 1151 claims.

I had studied enough cardio and neurology to prepare a very adequate wrongful death case, and the  Regional VA counsel ordered a Peer Review within months of getting my SF 95.The review supported all of my charges. RC wanted to begin  negotiations with me then(mid 1995) but then

the RC and the Peer Review doc 'disappeared' along with the actual report.I had to start from day one with the General Counsel,sending them all the evidence again but without that critical report.That's OK the GC settled the FTCA with me and then after a 1151 denial, at my RO and a brief battle, that was awarded too,.....in 2003 when I re opened for AO DMII death (only because my daughter insisted I do that-I didnt want to deal with them again )I ordered my C file and the report was the last thing in the stack. Even OMLA VA told me it has Never existed.

OMLA Office of Medical Legal. (They also had a copy of it too but lied to me and said they didnt)

I dont think that report would have mysteriously disappeared during the FTCA/1151 claims if I had a lawyer.

The problems with shredding is trying to determine what they did SHRED,that the claimant had sent to them,.

I have over 20 years of both PC and hard copy of everything I have ever sent to them and always used USPS with a tracking slip.

Also what might appear to be missing from a C file is something a vet rep said to a vet, 'I will send that in to them', and then maybe the rep never did.

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It seems to me that someone should lose their job over this sort of behavior...

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use