Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Trying To Pull

Rate this question


Berta

Question

From VA Watchdog:

http://vawatchdog.org/nfDEC06/nf122106-3.htm

2922. [bull] SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 38 USC 501(a); 38 USC 7105(d)

CFR Citation: 38 CFR 19.38; 38 CFR 20.302; 38 CFR 20.303

Legal Deadline: None

"Abstract: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its

regulations regarding the time limit for filing a response to a

Supplemental Statement of the Case. We propose to change the response

period from 60 days to 30 days. The purpose of the change is to improve

efficiency in the appeals process and reduce the time it takes to

resolve an appeal, while still providing an appellant with a reasonable

period of time to respond to a Supplemental Statement of the Case"

Also I caught this at Larry's sight today:

"The VA may discard paperwork upon receipt. That 'discard' possibility means that a veteran

must have a secure means of delivery of his paperwork to the VA. Regrettably, veterans

must presume that the VA will not act ethically with the veteran’s paperwork received in

ordinary mail. All veteran paperwork sent to any VA Regional Office should be sent

CERTIFIED – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED." Attorney who handles veterans' claims"

They discard it when you DO send it certified.

WHat a crock! - and another thing- they often don't even read the veteran's response to SSOCs these days-

I got awards based on NODs, or SOC and SSOC responses in the late 1990s and these days- the Buffalo VARO does not even read or acknowledge any response or any evidence attached to it.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

it's a pain in the a$$ but I'm hand delivering everything from now on. The VA just cost me 45 days by signing for and 'discarding' paperwork sent certified mail return receipt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing the return receipt shows is that you sent something to them. It could be a Christmas card for all they know. You gotta hand carry it and have it stamped and get a copy with the stamp on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rdawg, not all veterans are physically capable of following your suggestion, which is still a good one, but not readily available to everyone. In our case, the RO is about a four hour drive, one way. Not all veterans can stand a trip that long.

I believe that veterans and their supporters should start demanding that some credence and credibility be given to certified mail as legal proof of mailing. After all, the VA sends its correspondence by regular mail, and expects everyone to accept that as proof of mailing, just because they said they mailed it - - no written proof expected there.

I note the condition or the issue discussed in the mailing on the green receipt card, on the side with our return address, so I can keep the issues mailed about straight. Of course, the counter argument there is that I could write something down after the fact on a certified mail slip I could have used in mailing them the Christmas card you mentioned. But how far should we allow the VA to make up excuses like that, in the face of documented evidence of mailing, and not challenge them?

John Roche, the author of the "Veteran's Survival Guide" sends copies of his claim or NOD to his Congressman every time he files something. I think that's a great idea!

If we allow the VA to bulldoze us over this issue without challenging them, we allow them to get away with this lame effort to avoid processing veteran disability claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use