Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Secondary condition question

Rate this question


saxman

Question

Hello everybody!  according to CFR 3.310 secondary condition become part of the original condition when service connection is establish for the secondary condition. My question is will my secondary condition be considered static since the original condition is static and 20 year protected?  All replies are welcome.  Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Great question.  I will give it an "intuitive" answer, it would require hours of legal reading to find out for sure.  Unless someone can cite case law that is precedential, then you can try intuitive answer.  

My intuitive answer:  No.  

While I get what you are saying there is another way to interpret this..that "how you arrived" at service connection (primary, secondary, presumptive, etc) makes no difference, only the date does.  

Interestingly, Im arguing along those same lines..provided, I can get an attorney to represent me at the CAVC for that.  

I allege the same thing you are..that the primary and secondary conditions are "inextricably intertwined" and you have to "bind them together with rope".   

While I am hopeful, it may mean there is no case precedence on this.  

Attorney's dont like "risking their own money" by taking on a case that does not have any precedence, reminding you that attorneys invest time (which is money) and expenses into a case, sometimes for years, and they want to get paid for their time, so I get that they dont like taking risks.  

Maybe there is case precedence..I just dont know.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Federal law under 38 CFR 3.310 governs these claims, and once granted, the secondary condition is considered a part of the original condition.

However as for as the 20 year rule  they would go by the Award date on the secondary/condition...  & this don't make any sense if they make it a part of the original condition.

   In my opinion it should be counted as the original condition  As the CFR 3.310  Clearly States. and go by that date  but VA is going to do what they do best and fight the Veteran on an issue like this.

I would not worry to much about it  if you have 20 years under your belt.  even if the secondary was added years later  its suppose to become part of the original condition.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If veteran  is granting service connection for secondary condition to an existing S.C. condition,  then full benefit is sought on appeal. 

So in my opinion they would go by the date of the awarded secondary condition.

 

jmo

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks Broncovet and Buck52!  I have a total of 5 secondary conditions related to my primary condition that is 20 year protected. The last one was just awarded May of this year and I have one that I did a NOD last year and waiting to see if it will be awarded because of the additional evidence I sent in with the NOD. The main thing I want is for the VA to say the secondary conditions are static! I would presume that they are because it's arthritis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I am not 100% sure on the 20 year rule for a secondary condition  if its  S.C. TO an Already S.C.  Condition,  that makes the Secondary a part of the first condition as a whole and static/chronic not expected to improve over your life time/just as (IF) you were rated chronic/static for the original condition.....  so it may very well be included in the 20 year rule   I mean how would they separate the service connected condition?  unless they  go by the date the secondary condition was awarded?

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use