Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Looking for help regarding re-evaluation for PTSD

Rate this question


Awen

Question

I was suppose to be re-evaluated for my PTSD, which was put at 100% temporary last summer, but was put off until this summer, which they put off until NEXT summer.  I requested to be re-evaluated this year, as my children are now in college and until it is put at permanent, I cannot get college tuition paid for them, and am not allowed to work either.  I was re-evaluated on Nov. 7th.  I received the decision on the 24th!  (it was sent on the 22nd)  They kept it at 100% temporary!!  The explanation says, "The overall evidentiary record shows that the severity of your disability most closely approximates the criteria for a 70% disability evaluation currently, however sustained improvement has not been demonstrated and thus you will be required to report for a review examination in the future."

Would it be to my benefit to appeal the decision?  I was initially put at 50% for PTSD and a total of 80%, but when something happened at work and the V.A. in 2012, I asked to be re-evaluated and was put at 100% temporary for PTSD, without the rest being a part of the disability rating.  If I am at 70% (which I would agree with), for PTSD, and if they maintain the rest of the disabilities (which were not re-evaluated, but were already put into the permanent category - so shouldn't that be maintained?), I would be at 100%, correct?  But I don't know how this works if I dispute it, or if I would be immediately re-evaluated again, or they would just set it at 70% permanent, or something else.... Or how long it would take!

Any information/help/advice, would be great.  Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

VA and probably 99.9% of MH Clinicians believe PTSD Symptoms are treatable and that with their EXPERT support a PTSD Sufferer will experience a lessening of symptoms. Right or wrong, who knows?

Depending on your age and how long you've been DX'd and receiving treatment for PTSD, the VA will continue to review your VMC and Private Clinician Treatment Notes for sustained improvement.

I recall you mentioned above about the VA determining your  actually now at 70% SC based on your Treatment Notes and recent exam. With that said, a T & P doesn't look probable.

Are you over 55, have you held the 100% PTSD SC for over (5) Years? All PTSD Awards are Diary Dated for 3 to 5 Year Re-exams up till 55.

It also appears from your post that you believe you can and want to work. Being capable of earning in excess of the VA SGI of $12,400 under 65, would rule out even a tempory IU Award.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gastone:

Thank you for your response. 

1)  I am 45 y.o.

2)  I was initially at 80% permanent, 50% of that was PTSD, in 2010.

3)  In 2012, something very bad happened at work at the same time that there was VA worker misconduct that ended in the counselor being fired, and I had to quit my job and was re-evaluated, putting me at 100% for PTSD, temporary - because they put me at 100% for PTSD, the physical stuff was not part of it, but is still there (i.e., 30% physical)

4)  So, I have been 100% temp for PTSD, for 5 1/2 years.

5)  I do not agree that I am 100% for PTSD, but do agree that because of the 2012 incidents, I am worse than I was in 2010, with a high likelihood of being hospitalized when/if something traumatic happens (as happened in 2015, and 2017), and as such, would say the 70% is an accurate reflection of where I am now and probably will be for life (given that each trauma is cumulative).

6)  With a 70% rating for PTSD, and the 30% physical that was already permanent and continues to be there (i.e., a seizure disorder that was caused by treatment at Walter Reed; a shoulder, injury; elbow and wrist injuries, resulting in surgery; degenerative back and neck problems, ...), the rating should be 100% total (the original 80%, plus 20% more for the PTSD in large part due to VA misconduct - I know things aren't just added together, but the first (i.e., highest rating) is added to a factor of the other ratings, with the other ratings being 30% before all this in 2012, so that the PTSD does go up by the full 20%) and permanent if they agree with their own assessment that I am at 70% for PTSD.

I hope that all makes more sense.  Yes, I know the work situation makes me inelligable for the 100% PTSD, which is why I am not working...  although the other issue is that I don't know if I can work even part time and not end up in the hospital at some point.  If I go to work, they would put me down to some other percentage, I may end up in the hospital, have to quit the job, and would not have the disability to pay the bills because I would no longer be at 100%, and it could take a year to be re-evaluated and decided upon, at which point I will already have lost my home.  The second issue is that, with 2 kids in college currently, I NEED to work to help them with tuition if I am not at 100% permanent (with PTSD, or with total of PTSD and physical) so that they can use chapter 35. With the continued temporary, all for PTSD, I am deemed not able to work but also not able to help them with tuition through chapter 35 - a lose-lose for me. 

So, my basic question I suppose comes down to, is it a good idea, given all this, to appeal this current decision?  If so, how do I make the case that I am 70% PTSD permanent, with the 30% permanent physical, as was already determined?

Thank you again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Again it all depends what caused the PTSD in my case it was a TBI which is Permanent and total since my brain is Permanently damaged for my lifetime...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use