Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

OIF/OEF Combat Vet and Claims Past 1 yr.

Rate this question


apocalypsesrt

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

apocalypsesrt

where did you read this?

'I keep reading that I can only connect things that were diagnosed within 1yr of discharge.''

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

O/O, here my 3 Cents to add to Buck's 2 Cents, so now you got a nickles worth of advice from a couple Old Dog Nam Vets.

All Vets, Combat, REMFs, or stateside Warriors, upon discharge; have a 12 Month Presumptive Period for a DIRECT Sevice Connection Condition of anything that happens to damage them physically or Mentally during the 365 immediately following Discharge.

Such as, you take a fall and land on your Johnson, breaking it. As long as you have Med Evidence supporting the injury as happening during the 12 months after discharge Presumptive Period, a Secondary SMC for Loss of Creative Organ could be Filed and SC'd at a later date.  That's how it was in the 60's and it's still that way today.

I do recall reading on a VMC Bulletin board about OIF/Afgan Vets being eligible for VMC Medical Care for 5 years after separation from active duty. I think Nam Vets were good for the 1 year period after discharge. Ther are a host of OIF Burn Pit Presumptives, but I can't say I've seen anything extending the 1-year Presumptive SC Period to Active Duty after Discharge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
16 hours ago, Buck52 said:

your correct but your wrong also...there is a program for combat veterans continued being deployed/diagnosed  but

if you were in combat and failed to submit a claim...thats ok 

because an in-service condition that gets worse after years of discharge  the veteran can file a claim  , there's no limit on filing a claim.

example  if you were in the military and was traumatized or injured at any location not just a war zone  and you were traumatized  but you never filed a claim for it until it got worse or you realized you needed help  lets say for a mental problem (PTSD) If you were discharged years later and was diagnosed with PTSD by a VA Dr years later  you can file a claim on it.

you need a VA Diagnosis and Dr to opien that it is likely as not that your PTSD was caused by an in service event.(he reads your military records) and what you tell him/her.

 & prove the evidence was and did happen while in the service, use STR'S MEDICAL RECORDS ,UNIT REPORTS, BUDDY STATEMENTS IF NEEDED AND YOUR STRESSOR AS TO WHAT EVENT HAPPEN, IF IT WAS COMBAT VA CONCEDES THE STRESSORS,  IF YOU HAVE A CAB, OR SHOW DEPLOYMENT TO A COMBAT ZONE AND YOU WERE IN FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE. THEN NO STRESSOR NEEDED.

Thanks Buck! I guess I was not understanting the verbage. It looked like I had to make my claims within 1yr and that if it wasnt in my military medical record I couldnt claim it anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
15 hours ago, Gastone said:

Such as, you take a fall and land on your Johnson, breaking it. As long as you have Med Evidence supporting the injury as happening during the 12 months after discharge Presumptive Period, a Secondary SMC for Loss of Creative Organ could be Filed and SC'd at a later date.  That's how it was in the 60's and it's still that way today.

Noted, my Johnson is covered for 12months post discharge. lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

A, assault with a  Dead Weapon is nothing to laugh about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use