Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

PTSD and gambling?

Rate this question


11cvolley

Question

So I found out today that my Uncles neighbor is 100% for only ptsd. He tried talking to me while I was visiting my uncle. He then invites me to go to the casino with him to play cards; which, I declined. I'm not judging but it is peaking my curiosity. How do 100% ptsd veterans manage to go gambling in a crowded casino that requires interaction, but can't work? I'm not judging or plan on reporting. Not my job or business to try to report people. I just want to understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
20 minutes ago, Navy4life said:

Any drug use isn't casual enjoyment in my opinion, as using drugs are illegal.  Obviously with the exception of prescribed drugs, but again, that 'can' be addictive

@Navy4life

thank you for the response.

Not to belabor the point but your response does the same thing again, just a different version.

Legality and Addiction are not synonyms, nor are they proxies for one another.

Caffeine and Nicotine are legal. In 30 plus states pot is legal to some degree or another.

All "can be addicting", just as thrill seeking is addicting. To some people, in some contexts, at some times, they "can be" but they are not always addicting to the majority of people.

Conversely, Hillbilly Heroin, a.k.a. Oxycontin, Hydrocodone, Oxycodonen etc, are legally prescribed drugs that frequently lead to addiction, and crime. In some cases, in as little as a single dose according to the literature from the NIH and CDC. It is literally the basis of our national opioid epidemic

The point is not to say you cannot have a different opinion, you can believe whatever you want to, the point is that broad stroke generalizations and hyperbolic concept-associations are problematic for people and society in general.

For you specifically,  as someone who has the experiences and conditions you post about, your long term path to "getting over" (bad term but there really is not a good one) or gaining control of your situations involves granular specificity and understanding of how you associate things in your emotions and mind. If, when, and how you get there is between you and your therapists.

The whole idea behind programs like Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprogramming (EMDR) is to change how we associate our feelings & thoughts about our harmful nexus events. In the long term each of those, along with talk therapies, all move towards specificity and away from generalities.

For example there is a documented association between feeling guilt and generalized feelings about how things "should be" or "what we did wrong" in relation to our traumatic events. When we dissect and distill the events through analysis we move from the general to the individual and specific parts of the event and why we feel guilt. The analysis is meant to decouple guilt from the event as each specific part is understood and addressed.

MST victims often have a nagging and unformed feeling of "what did i do to encourage this/deserve this", and of course the answer is nothing, but as a generality that does not help them get control of those feelings. Breaking down the events to specifics  can let them work towards decreasing that nagging thought by dismantling the components, which reduces their power to affect them or creep up on them.

On the more humorous side of generalities being bad things, a few years ago a private study conducted by a national institute concerned with insurance rates and accidents found that people who had bumper stickers with slogans like "God is my copilot" or "When the rapture comes, don't bother to honk" were worse drivers than people without those stickers. The conclusions were based on a  meta-analysis of drivers who had more than one reported wreck in the previous ten years. Somehow the study leaked out and was reported in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

It is an unfair generalization to say that all religious people are bad drivers, but the numbers found in that study make the general case that it might be true.

Funny? yes, Accurate? no, Fair? no, Helpful? no.

Hope you have a nice day and that you will consider how you use generalities in future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Not debating with you...just agree to disagree..your original post about a Veteran with 100% PTSD going gambling was what I was really focusing on in my post.  

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
22 minutes ago, Navy4life said:

Not debating with you

You must be misunderstanding my response, I was not debating anything. I pointed out a fallacious linkage between legality and addiction. Any agreement or disagreement you feel is with the dictionary and reality.

If you don't want to accept what I posted, that is up to you.

Good luck in your progress

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, Navy4life said:

In all fairness, yes I agree "can be addictive" for TWO out of the THREE...Gambling and Alcohol can be casual enjoyment.  Any drug use isn't casual enjoyment in my opinion, as using drugs are illegal.  Obviously with the exception of prescribed drugs, but again, that 'can' be addictive.

I understand what you're saying. A therapist I was seeing brought up sugar when I told her how I felt about being on medication. She even said she has seen patients addicted to sex. She was telling me that don't look at has only an addiction, but what it does for/to you. She is addicted to coffee, but she moderates and it helps her in the morning. My medicine helps me through the day and helps me sleep at night. 

 

I should clarify my original post. I was also concerned about gambling because I've seen what it can do to people. Much like a shopping addiction. It can set you on the path to being homeless. I known someone that almost lost their house because the wife was the money manager and she was spending all the money on TV channel shopping networks. From my reading PTSD and gambling are linked together. I may be wrong because my concentration is crap nowadays. I just think every veteran deserves a support network. A lot of us ptsd/mst don't have that. I don't count family as support tho. Last time I told my mother what was on my mind she just gave me that look, 'like wtf?!' 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

really its none of your business you cant live or die for this veteran also all 

treatment in MH will tell you to do something with your life and to not lay down to 

die.....Maybe your care ant right or you need a job for the VA telling on your brothers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 10/16/2018 at 6:43 PM, vetquest said:

I am a 100% veteran and spend a lot of time with church activities.  I may look normal, if you overlook the leg braces, but most of my disability is invisible.  I question my disability many times but my wife reminds me that I have a very compromised memory and I am not always fully up to par.

Do those leg braces qualify you for the clothing allowance, vehicle grant, and Special addaptive housing allowance? 

Not prying, rather, informing. I am also in Tennnessee and wear leg braces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use