Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can i get 100%?

Rate this question


wes44

Question

>I recently submitted a claim through the va for ptsd and schizophrenia. I had applied for ptsd in 2016 but got denied because i had no evidence to submit.  This time i had a good bit of evidence. I think my strongest piece would be a lay letter my mother wrote that details my schizophrenia and ptsd and gives a service connection. These disabities have rendered me unemployable and the letter states that. Since it says im unemployable and my personal relationships are affected,  is that enough to get a 100%? Also how strong are lay letters in the evidence portion of the claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

 As Broncovet says you need a nexus.  That is a medical opinion that your condition is at least as likely as not related to your service.

Edited by vetquest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Unless you fall into the 2010 PTSD criteria ( available here under a Search) as to, that your service gave you a fear of Hostile fire, and/or close proximity to it)

or you have the CIB, CAR, or PH on your DD 214, you will have to prove the "nexus" , meaning the link to your service.

I have an article here searchable as to what stressors are or are not.

Your PTSD diagnosis will have to come from a VA MH professional.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This is the article I meant:

https://community.hadit.com/topic/51577-new-post-defining-a-stressor/

and the 2010 PTSD criteria is explained here:

"38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f) concerns service connection for PTSD. It states that service connection for PTSD requires (1) medical evidence diagnosing the condition in accordance with 38 C.F.R. § 4.125(a), (2) a link established by medical evidence between current symptoms and an in service stressor, and (3) credible supporting evidence that the in service stressor occurred. With regard to the stressor element, section 3.304(f)(2) states that if a Veteran engaged in combat with the enemy and the claimed stressor is related to that combat, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, and provided that the claimed stressor is consistent with the circumstances, conditions, or hardships of the Veteran's service, the Veteran's lay testimony alone may establish occurrence of the claimed in-service stressor. Similarly, section 3.304(f)(3) states that if a stressor claimed by a Veteran is related to the Veteran's fear of hostile military or terrorist activity and a medical professional confirms the claimed stressor is adequate to support a diagnosis of PTSD and that the Veteran's symptoms are related to the claimed stressor, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, and provided the claimed stressor is consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the Veteran's service, the Veteran's lay testimony alone may establish the occurrence of the claimed in service stressor."

https://www.va.gov/vetapp18/files5/1827252.txt

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

wes44 what other evidence do you have that you re-submitted?

you quoted

I think my strongest piece would be a lay letter my mother wrote that details my schizophrenia and ptsd and gives a service ''

unless your mother is a quailfied Dr and works for the VA   this is your least strongest piece of evidence.

...they will take lay statements into consideration AS TO HOW YOUR BEHAVIOR HAS CHANGE BEFORE AND AFTER MILITARY but these statements need to be notarized and the people that write these lay statements  need to say they are not Qualified Dr. just there lay opinions.

''I had applied for ptsd in 2016 but got denied because i had no evidence to submit.  This time i had a good bit of evidence. I think my strongest piece would be a lay letter my mother wrote that details my schizophrenia and ptsd and gives a service connection. These disabities have rendered me unemployable and the letter states that. Since it says im unemployable and my personal relationships are affected,  is that enough to get a 100%? Also how strong are lay letters in the evidence portion of the claim?''

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

One thing I would add to Berta's remark on the requirement that  a VA psychologist/psychiatrist make the diagnosis. If the VA denies you, you are free to obtain a private IMO from a psychiatrist/psychologist that  rebuts the VA finding. Then you have what is known as "equipoise"-as in one positive and one negative diagnosis. They cancel each other out and you get the benefit of the doubt -i.e. you win. I do this every day.

I had an AF Vet who worked the flightline at Tan Son Nhut as a jet engine mechanic. On slow days he'd help unload the incoming wounded and dead and put them in the meat wagon going up to the Hospital. It finally ate his brain and he started snorting junk. He was sent back to the US for drug rehab but he flunked. He cleaned up but wanted out. He had 3.7 yrs in so they let him out... with a DD 257.  Got out and was denied five times since 70. I bought a nexus from my folks at Mednick and got him his win. This is how we do it. I file and let VA deny me. I get the nexus and blow them out of the water. That's why we call it win or die.

Always remember, VA is not allowed to develop negative evidence against you (Mariano v Principi) If they deny, and you provide a positive nexus that is bulletproof, that's all she wrote. You win and live happily ever after. It's a recipe-just like baking cookies. Follow the recipe and you'll get a win.

Happy T day to you all-most especially Theresa but also to my lifelong friends Berta, Loyal and Brett. Live long and prosper.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use