Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
chibears3531

Sleep apnea- does the DBQ cover the "medically necessary/required" language?

Question

Hey everybody! Long time lurker, first time poster.

My question is regarding the sleep apnea language that specifies that a prescription of a breathing assistance device is "medically necessary" for a 50% rating:

Assuming that a vet is already prescribed a CPAP/APAP by the VA, does the sleep apnea DBQ portion under 2B "IS CONTINUOUS MEDICATION REQUIRED FOR CONTROL OF A SLEEP DISORDER CONDITION?" fulfill that language requirement?

Edited by chibears3531

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

The ratings are subject to the law 38 CFR 4.98 layouts the ratings for sleep apnea see image below

Screen Shot 2018-12-06 at 3.20.21 AM.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

"C," if you have a possible SA Claim possible, don't be a Lurker, your Start New SA Claim have been started. You have the 12 months to complete for the SA SC 50% after you find a non-VA SA Neurologist that present you any  of your SA attached to whatever caused by CAD or RX'd while you were on active doing,

Which of the about 12 medical problems that you expect to have that can be caused for the SA need of CPAP or BIPAP?

The 6847 SA is relativist reading and understanding the 0%, 30% and 50% Ratings if you passed. However, reading the 100% SC needs a bit of work. I went at 1 VMC  C & P SA DR Denie me while we talked, and (3) VA Raters also Denied my 100% Claim in 07/2016. An SR Rater agreed on me with my claim as I addressed the Legal Status.  Awarded me with the 100% 11/2016 Retro about 8 mos before and also added the SMC S due to the 60% of other SC %.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

Sleep Apnea is one of the most difficult conditions to get SC, so make sure you have all your ducks in a row.  

DO NOT count on the answers in the DBQ to satisfy VA's new recent requirment:  "That the CPAP is medically necessary".  

This is just another VA "con game" to deny Vets.  Think about it:  A CPAP is by prescription only.  Do you hear the doc say, "Naw, this machine isnt medically necessary, I prescribed it because I get a kickback on each machine sold."  

It should be "presumed" that, in the doc's opinion, the device is medically necessary, or else he would not have prescribed it!!!!

When you take meds for diabetes, does the doc prescribe this because its necessary, or because the doc "likes writing prescriptions"??  

Make no mistake, tho.  This new requirement will be strictly enforced.  Unless the doc specifically says this cpap is "medically necessary", expect to get denied.  

The DBQ is unlikely to help you.  The DBQ is designed by VA, not Veterans, and its designed to "gloss over" critical, pertinent information the Vet needs to get SC.  You are unlikely to find a "check box" that this is "at least as likely as not" related to service.  The VA does not want to EVEN suggest to the doc this may be related to service.  Instead, the doc will have to probably write a seperate nexus letter.  The VA does not want to make it easy to get SC.  Alex has pointed out that VSO's sometimes persue an appeal for years not even bothering to notice there is no nexus. Many VSO's think a Nexus is a small car made by Lexus.  They think "Caluza" is element number 13 on the periodic chart, in between Hydrogen and laughing gas.  

You need to be proactive and make sure everything requred for SC is documented in your claim.  Dont depend on a VSO, dont depend on a DBQ, do depend on you reading your file with your own eyes confirming you have all caluza elements, as well as the "medically necessary" documented for OSA.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1
7 hours ago, chibears3531 said:

I'm awaiting an IMO by a sleep specialist stating that my service connected TBI "at least as likely as not " caused my SA that the VA prescribed an APAP for.

 

I have an appointment in January with the VA doc that prescribed my APAP.  I'm not sure how to go about asking him for a letter or statement of medical necessity. My plan is to bring him the sleep study to refresh his memory and a bunch of peer reviewed journal articles showing that breathing devices improve PTSD symptomology (which I'm rated for) to make the case that my device is "medically necessary."

 

That's unfortunate, I thought I could kill two birds with one stone. The same doc who's writing the IMO is filling out the DBQ.

Which service-connected disability are you going to use to secondary-service connect your OSA? TBI or PTSD?

You can use TBI or PTSD, but you can't use both; if I'm not mistaken.

Either way, you already meet 2 out of 3 requirements to secondary connect OSA.

1. Must have a service-connected disability

2. Must have a current diagnosis of disability claimed.

3. You're just missing the nexus of opinion. Which it sounds like you'll be able to obtain from the sleep specialist first for the OSA, as secondary to TBI.

If you want to get an, IMO from the VA doc you'll need this article that was done by a VA doctor (see attached files), to give your request some teeth, along with the peer review journals you have to claim OSA, as secondary to PTSD; if you want to go that route. 

Best wishes on your claim.

PTSD and Sleep Apnea article.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
8 hours ago, Gastone said:

Which of the about 12 medical problems that you expect to have that can be caused for the SA need of CPAP or BIPAP?

I'm awaiting an IMO by a sleep specialist stating that my service connected TBI "at least as likely as not " caused my SA that the VA prescribed an APAP for.

 

6 hours ago, broncovet said:

Sleep Apnea is one of the most difficult conditions to get SC, so make sure you have all your ducks in a row.  

DO NOT count on the answers in the DBQ to satisfy VA's new recent requirment:  "That the CPAP is medically necessary".  

This is just another VA "con game" to deny Vets.  Think about it:  A CPAP is by prescription only.  Do you hear the doc say, "Naw, this machine isnt medically necessary, I prescribed it because I get a kickback on each machine sold."  

It should be "presumed" that, in the doc's opinion, the device is medically necessary, or else he would not have prescribed it!!!!

When you take meds for diabetes, does the doc prescribe this because its necessary, or because the doc "likes writing prescriptions"??  

Make no mistake, tho.  This new requirement will be strictly enforced.  Unless the doc specifically says this cpap is "medically necessary", expect to get denied.  

I have an appointment in January with the VA doc that prescribed my APAP.  I'm not sure how to go about asking him for a letter or statement of medical necessity. My plan is to bring him the sleep study to refresh his memory and a bunch of peer reviewed journal articles showing that breathing devices improve PTSD symptomology (which I'm rated for) to make the case that my device is "medically necessary."

 

6 hours ago, broncovet said:

The DBQ is unlikely to help you.  The DBQ is designed by VA, not Veterans, and its designed to "gloss over" critical, pertinent information the Vet needs to get SC.  You are unlikely to find a "check box" that this is "at least as likely as not" related to service.  The VA does not want to EVEN suggest to the doc this may be related to service.  Instead, the doc will have to probably write a seperate nexus letter.  The VA does not want to make it easy to get SC.  Alex has pointed out that VSO's sometimes persue an appeal for years not even bothering to notice there is no nexus. Many VSO's think a Nexus is a small car made by Lexus.  They think "Caluza" is element number 13 on the periodic chart, in between Hydrogen and laughing gas.  

That's unfortunate, I thought I could kill two birds with one stone. The same doc who's writing the IMO is filling out the DBQ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Willy P
      Good Afternoon Team,
      Short back story/timeline:
      Left Active Duty: August 2015 Diagnosed with Sleep Apnea February 2016 (6 months later) Submitted claim in May 2016 with my evidence:  Sleep study DBQ In service complaint of snoring exerpt from my medical record Favorable C&P Exam opinion (at least as likely as not...) VA Denied my claim in August 2016 I did nothing because I didn't think I could come up with any other evidence Fast forward to last year.....
      I scratched some pennies together and paid for an IMO, then submitted the letter via a supplemental claim.  I was awarded SC for sleep apnea at 50% within a month of the VA receiving my claim.  Success!  Here is the link to that process in the research forum: 
       
      So here is my line of thought...
      Can I use HLR to fight for an earlier effective date, or do I have to use CUE?  I mean, the VA had everything it needed to make the proper rating the first time (In-service event, nexus from the C&P doc, current diagnosis...).  I have a hard time with the fact that I had to pay an outside doctor just to agree with the C&P exam doctor.  Why would the rater place his/her opinion over the VA's own doctor?  Shouldn't the benefit of the doubt have gone to me?  From what I understand, I can't CUE the benefit of the doubt anyway.
      Since I am within the appeals period of the supplemental claim, I'm thinking the easiest path may be to request HLR in order to ask them to CUE themselves on the 2016 decision.  Is that possible?  I'm just trying to avoid CUE if I can, since it's mainly a "last resort" type of measure.
    • By S. Bruce
      I was awarded 30% service connected for sleep apnea when I left the military in 2008. In 2013, I was directed to and took another sleep study. It was found and the VA agreed that I needed to start using the CPAP. VA reviewed the evidence, agreed, paid for and I have been using the CPAP since 2013. In Sep 2019, during a review of my records, my representative informed me that using the CPAP meant that my SA rating should be 50% versus 30%. I filed an increase claim and was increased to 50% with an effective date of Sep 2019.  Shouldn't the effective date be April 2013 when the diagnosis was received and approved? I checked and the 50% rating for using a CPAP was in place in 2013. I wasn't aware of the rating difference at that time, so I didn't file a claim at that time. I'm asking because I'm thinking I may be due some back pay...……….
    • By ROMAD
      I submitted a claim for Sinusitis, OSA,, and Tinnitus. My claim was denied for all 3. 
      The tinnitus they claim was neither occurred in nor was caused by service. My job on active duty exposed me to gun fire, explosions, tanks, and tracked vehicles. I submitted the Duty Noise Exposure Spreadsheet that displayed my AFSC was rated as highly likely to be exposed to loud noise. In the first Exam they claimed I said my hearing loss was from jets flying overhead. Never said that, so they scheduled a second exam. This one they acknowledged the correct job but I was still denied. The evidence listed on the second decision dd not include the MOS Noise exposure chart I included on the first claim. I never went to sick call for ringing ears because that is just silly (had I known then) and was not something you did. I have had quiet office jobs since separating from The Air Force. What am I missing?
      For the OSA claim, I submitted Lay statements from my current wife and my ex-wife as well as explained to the doctor my symptoms and  that when I was on Active Duty i had no idea sleep apnea was a thing. I assumed I just snored and was tired because I was working hard. I had a sleep study this past year and was deemed to have severe OSA.  In my claim I listed that I believed my osa was related to my cluster headache disability. They responded Cluster headaches do not cause OSA even if there are many people with cluster headaches and also OSA.  I experienced a stuffy nose during my headaches  on the left side. This was completely different from the closing of my airway when I would sleep. It was just worst if both occurred at the same time. They claimed I have other risk factors such as being male, obesity, and advancing age. Something I did not include in my claim was the fact that I was on the Fat Boy program at one point on Active Duty and my SMR made a reference to obesity. Would this help support my claim. Also in the second decision they said I was a 73 year old male and I am no where near 73 so they probably mixed my records with someone else. What can I do about this?
      And Sinusitis, I have a couple diagnosis in my SMR's specifically listing sinusitis. I have had sinus issues since I was on Active Duty. I use a Netti Pot and have been diagnosed post active duty with sinusitis. The DBQ from the QTC Medical  Doc claims I have rebound sinusitis because I mentioned using Afrin. I have always been aware of the danger of over use and in my VA records I discussed this concern whenever the VA would prescribe a nasal spray. What am I missing and how can I get this  corrected. The errors on the 2 decisions make it seem as if they are not very organized and I have to suffer from their disorganization. Are they supposed to review all of the evidence from the initial claim when you submit a supplemental, or should I have resubmitted all  the documents from the initial claim. Are the documents that contain research that supports your claim supposed to be on the evidence list as well? They were not on there and if they did not give those documents equal consideration what is my recourse. Any assistance would be appreciated Thanks for listening.
       
    • By Clarence
      Hello Vets!
      I read on one website concerning Sleep Apnea that in accordance with VA Adjudication Manual M21-1, Part III, subpart iv, chapter 4, Section D updated April 18, 2016; There is no longer the requirement to have been diagnosed with SA prior to leaving the military to receive a rating.
      First, I looked at the cited manual and Section D, does not pertain to Respiratory issues, Section F does. So I'm just looking for clarification.
       
      Clarence
    • By GeekySquid
      Curious what to do with this piece of information.
      I was going through my c&p's and the one I had in Aug 2018 that bumped me to 100% has this line in it.
      "He reports breathing difficulties, diagnosed - Obstructive Sleep Apnea. "
      I was using my CPAP when my original C&P in 2013 was done. My record has all sorts of references to it, including the VA issuing me on and way. I have the Sleep Study results in my hands.
      So what paths are open to me? in the 2013 standards being issued a CPAP w/ an SC (PTSD) related condition should have given me a 50% rating. Today's standards say I need the medical opinion to state' "he will die without it" or other such magic word nonsense.
      what is my most likely path to getting it rated and possibly retro pay?
       
  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Enough has been said on this topic. This forum is not the proper forum for an attorney and former client to hash out their problems. Please take this offline
    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
      • 7 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:


      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis


      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.


      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 

       

      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.

       

      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines