Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

5 Year Review (All ailments or only some?)

Rate this question


ArmyVet270

Question

Hello,

I have a question about the first 5 year review of C&P Exams. I have 7 conditions that are rated Lumbar Spine 40%, Insomnia/Anxiety Disorder 10%, Migraines 0%, Ankle 10%, Bilateral Pea Plants 30%, Tinnitus 10% & Gastro 60% for a combine rating of 90%.

My gastro was a reconsideration with surgical scope and biopsies and private dbq was accepted. All other ailments were from initial ETS physical and 1st C&P Exam. 

I currently use the VA for primary medical care and have all my medications prescribed through them. 

 

My question is the 5 year review for each and every ailment or is the VA going to let me know what is under reconsideration?

Only 1 condition Back states at the bottom of the write up "Since there is a likelihood of improvement, the assigned evaluation is not considered permanent and is subject to a future review".

The majority of my conditions are basically treated with a regiment of medication I get from the VA and the standard 6-9 month checkups barring any acute instances. 

The VA Health care is great but the administrative side of consistently proving or re-justifying ones ailments is mentally stressful. I guess I just don't know what the threshold of acceptable is like is there a certain amount of appointments I need or checkups with specialists other than just continuing my regiment of medications and VA checkups like I have been. 

Thanks for any potential insights and have a great day!

ArmyVet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

When ever someone asks, "What will VA do when.....x happens", the answer is always the same.  Va does exactly what they please, when they want to do it, and not a minute earlier.  

So, we dont know.  However, your post indicated "only one" (your back) was "up for review"in 5 years.  We take your word for that, so you can presume none of the others are "up" to schedule you for a re evaluation exam.  

The big deal is, "did your conditions improve" since the c and p exam when you were rated? And only you know that.  There are 4 sets of rules for C and P re exams.

1.  Those conditions "under 5 years" or that are flagged "temporary".  You can likely get a re exam on these.

2.  Those conditions over 5 years but less than 10 years, or if you are rated P and T.  These have protections.  

3.  Those 10 years or more (protection from severance of SC).  Even more protections. 

4.  Those over 20 years.  The highest protection level..can not be reduced except for fraud.  

    I would advise you to read these regulations and see which apply to you:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Bron,

 

Thanks for the insight. On my end I can certainly say none of the conditions improved and many have gotten worse. Im working a Neuro/Psych consult for the Migraines and Anxiety classifications.

 

I suppose Im asking an overly simplistic insight as to what would inprovement be. 

Would be only staying on prescribed medicine and going to routine visits be considered Improved? I suppose that subjective. For instance when I had my scope procedure and was awarded 60% for gastro does that remain sufficient or do I need annual or periodic new dbq’s submitted once the connection has already been made?

Im unsure of if all are considered temporary or not only my back has a “may be reviewed note” in its write up where other conditions do not say this.

Also all conditions have been service connected in 2014 so technically my 5 year review will be happening at beginning of year 6.

Thanks for any additional insight 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, broncovet said:

When ever someone asks, "What will VA do when.....x happens", the answer is always the same.  Va does exactly what they please, when they want to do it, and not a minute earlier.  

So, we dont know.  However, your post indicated "only one" (your back) was "up for review"in 5 years.  We take your word for that, so you can presume none of the others are "up" to schedule you for a re evaluation exam.  

The big deal is, "did your conditions improve" since the c and p exam when you were rated? And only you know that.  There are 4 sets of rules for C and P re exams.

1.  Those conditions "under 5 years" or that are flagged "temporary".  You can likely get a re exam on these.

2.  Those conditions over 5 years but less than 10 years, or if you are rated P and T.  These have protections.  

3.  Those 10 years or more (protection from severance of SC).  Even more protections. 

4.  Those over 20 years.  The highest protection level..can not be reduced except for fraud.  

    I would advise you to read these regulations and see which apply to you:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

   

Bronco,

Excellent information!  One question though.  Are those 5, 10, 20 deadline dates from the date earliest date the condition was claimed, the date of the last C&P or the date of that the condition(s) were granted?  I can see where somebody might sit in a vacuum for 10 years waiting for an appeal and then get a grant, then wonder if they are about to immediately called back for a re-evaluation C&P.  Thanks again for the information!

Mark

 

USAF Active Duty 1988-1994

Security Police - Law Enforcement Specialist

Thank you all for your service to our great nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

As I understand the dates are reflected to your effective date of your award.  You will not normally be called back immediately for a condition grated on a backdated effective date but as Broncovet states you never know what the VA is up to.  That is the only nice thing about getting backdated ten years, your ratings are already protected on the five year rule.  In my situation I was supposed to be called back for reduction before my case ever finished but I never got called, I guess because my appeal was still pending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks, Vetquest!  I always wondered about how that was determined.  Of course, as you mentioned, the VA plays by their own rules, and we all know they change them as they need.

Have a great weekend!

Mark

USAF Active Duty 1988-1994

Security Police - Law Enforcement Specialist

Thank you all for your service to our great nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I agree with vetquest.  The effective date on your VARO decision is the determining factor for protections.  And, yes, it can take VA so long to process your application, that you are "protected" from the get go.  That is one advantage of massive delays, more than 5, 10, or even 20 years.  

Once service connected, your conditions are rated on "symptoms".  

If your symptoms got worse, (from the date of the c and p exam where you were awarded benefits) , then you can apply for an increase.  

As far as your symptoms improving due to medications, this should not affect your rating.   Now, if you lose a leg due to the war, and VA gives you a wooden leg and you can walk on it, then they take away your benefits.  (Just kidding).  

I view it as the "wooden leg" principal.  Sure, taking meds helps, but you have to keep on taking those meds, often increasing the dosage over time and, you have to put up with the side effects of the meds.  Sometimes, VA may list in the criteria, whether the symptoms are with or without meds.  (tho I cant think of an example, right now).  

Reread over the criteria for reductions.  https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

Pay attention to this part (applies to P and T or over 5 year rating):

Quote

 

Ratings on account of diseases which become comparatively symptom free (findings absent) after prolonged rest, e.g. residuals of phlebitis, arteriosclerotic heart disease, etc., will not be reduced on examinations reflecting the results of bed rest. Moreover, though material improvement in the physical or mental condition is clearly reflected the rating agency will consider whether the evidence makes it reasonably certain that the improvement will be maintained under the ordinary conditions of life. 

 


 

Ok, so let's say you are a diabetic for example, and you are SC for it, and you take meds for it.  Your conditions improve because you are faithful with your meds.  

VA tries to reduce you because you got better.  You get a lawyer, and he cites the above regulation, especially that underlined.  "Under ordinary conditions of life" does not mean you are taking insulin every day at 8 am, 12, 5 pm, and 10pm.  "Ordinary" people dont take those meds.  Diabetecs or sick people do, however.  I dont  think VA would be able to reduce you unless your improvement was permanent and without meds.  A wooden leg may help you cope with a missing leg, but its not the same as your original leg, no matter what you do..  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use