Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
- 0
VA Drug Screen
Rate this question
Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
Rate this question
Question
Grumpbox
I’m sure this question will raise many opinions/responses, but I will go on post for any feedback. Also, I was unsure where to post this, topic-wise.
Questions:
1. What is considered “Consent” for a drug screen through the VA?
2. Is the VA (and any type of employee though the VA) required to obtain consent for a drug screen?
3. What are the forms of consent? Written, “iMedConsent,” and/or telephonic—when recorded and not recorded with VA witness?
Situational question to stir the research:
If a Veteran gets called in for an annual blood/urine test, and VA employee making the call describes these tests as ‘routine,’ thereby confirming time and place with Veteran telephonically - does this constitute “Consent” for anything the VA wants to test you for?
The most information I can find for this is found here:
There is much talk talk about the 4th and 5th Amendment vs how the VA does what they want and when they want, disregarding policy outlined to follow.
I am just seeking input from those with more knowledge in this area.
Thank you greatly to anyone that jumps in for discussion!!
Grumpbox...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
9
6
4
2
Popular Days
Sep 9
24
Top Posters For This Question
GeekySquid 9 posts
Grumpbox 6 posts
GBArmy 4 posts
paulstrgn 2 posts
Popular Days
Sep 9 2019
24 posts
Popular Posts
GeekySquid
I am all for creating person specific treatments from their DNA, I just object having my info sold to others and me having no say over it or profit from it. There are jackasses out there trying to pat
GBArmy
Thanks, I'll check it out. "For-warned is for-armed" or something like that. But I also say a lot, "free is not free"; usually isn't.
GeekySquid
that would be very incident and context specific. It certainly could be, but as a broad stroke statement it would be hard to get SCOTUS to agree with your interpretation.
23 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now