Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Blue water navy

Rate this question


Daddy2019

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Hello Daddy2019 I am sorry for your loss. I am also sorry to have to tell you that the VA will not honor a disability request from your Mom on his behalf. The only possible  way is if he had filed a request for an Agent Orange presumptive condition previously, and then was denied. Even then, I'm not completely sure she could do it. The Blue Water veterans situation is a special situation. Normally, the rules are if there is an open claim and the veteran passes, the spose can submit paperwork to continue the claim, but there are restrictions on the benefits receive which are mostly back-pay,. The spouse wouldn't receive disability payments on his disability going forward. Call the info line, "Peggy", at 1-800-827-1000 and ask them if you can find out if a previous claim was submitted? Otherwise, you have to get a VSO to check for you. All this assumes that what he had submitted was enough info to get the claim approved now. That in itself is a big "if". Sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

As you said, your father was “on land”  , and if you mean he was incountry Vietnam during the war,  there is no need to consider the Blue Water Navy situation.

If the “land” was elsewhere, there are many places that AO has been confirmed as causing disability in veterans.

Tbird just  posted a link to that info .

You need to read the info in our Agent Orange  Forum and we need more info from you to help.

I  am a  AO widow. As  GBArmy said, there are specific conditions for veterans, and their survivors.

All of that info is in our AO forum.

Most of us were granted retro AO under the 2010 Nehmer decision, because of “Footnote One”.

I had already received DIC under 1151, wrongful death , then under direct SC ( AO DMII death ), and then under AO IHD death , although my DIC went unchanged, I received a large retroactive payment because my husband’s AO IHD “should have been coded” in a past VA decision.(Footnote One Nehmer)

My point is that you mother might well have a basis for a claim, as an accrued benefit.

But we need more info:

 

What was your mother’s DIC granted on?

Was it for a presumptive AO condition that caused or contributed to death?

Or under the 10 year 100% rule for a non – AO disability?

If it was DIC but not for an AO presumptive, what  is  the AO presumptive you feel a claim can be based on?

If your mother had a VSO or vet rep as POA on that award, they might still have a copy of any of his past denials.

Also she can request a copy of the husband’s C file with VA form 3288- it is searchable here.

I had already received DIC under 1151, 1994,wrongful death , then under direct SC ( AO DMII death  2010), and then under direct SC , AO IHD death ,2012 and although my DIC payment  went unchanged, I received a large retroactive payment because my husband’s AO IHD “should have been coded” in a past VA decision.(Footnote One Nehmer)

There is a difference between a AO disability that 'should have been coded" and a AO disability that was coded on a past rating sheet (which is the most prevalent situation I saw, under the 2010  Nehmer claims here-all explained in our AO forum under Footnote One.

My  point is , my husband already had two 100% P & T awards, granted posthumously, as well as the DMII situation that awarded direct SC death, and none  of  that was  an issue for my AO IHD death claim.

It involved 6 years of retroactive AO IHD payment.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Ms berta

what happens if the Veterans have filed their A.O. Claims and was denied  and in Appeal to the the new conditions that have been passed? how do the VA go by the EED?   The date the new conditions were passed  or  the date the veteran firsts filed?

  this could be a huge benefit for the veterans that had filed and was denied  but I am not sure when the EED WILL BE IN EFFECT? date they first filed  or the date the new conditions was passed?

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

No new conditions have been added since the 2010 Nehmer regs came out.

The answer to your question is here:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.816

and in many discussions regarding Nehmer 2010 and Footnote One- in our Agent Orange Forum.

Per my NVLSP contact attorney, the regulations for Blue Waters will be basically the same as Nehmer 2010,38 CFR 3.816 as Blue Water Navy vets , within the 12 mile limit , per their deck logs and dates of those logs, and with AO presumptives are now deserving the same equity as incountry Vietnam veterans.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

For some reason or another I thought they added more conditions to the A.O. List?

  they basically approved the BWN Veterans that were in country (Vietnam) or 12 miles out on their ship. and travel inland within the 12 N' miles .

 

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use