Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
.thumb.png.0b66d11060c658bf7aa45efe4372d3e7.png)
- 0
Announcements
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating
Picked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Vync
I placed a number of calls to the WH VA Hotline recently about issues with various legitimate problems with the VA. This morning, I received a call from a supervisor with the National Work Queue (NWQ) to respond to my concerns. The nice lady said she had the opportunity to go back and listen to numerous calls I made to 1-800-827-1000. She confirmed my concerns were indeed accurate. She is going to inform VA management of:
- Lack of dedicated form for Clear and Unmistakable Error requests is causing unnecessary confusion and delays. Simply creating a dedicated form, updating the web site, and providing training to VA staff.
- Call center staff providing inconsistent information when calling back.
- VA staff are not supposed to place callers on hold for more than two minutes at a time before coming back to check on them. Some call center staff may mute the call, but they don't have a way to track this down.
She did mention that calls to 1-800-927-1000 are recorded for quality purposes.
She also mentioned that complaints are investigated to confirm if they happened and the circumstances surrounding them. Depending on the findings and circumstances, employees may receive negative ratings on their performance reviews.
I almost forgot to add this. You know that prepared statement that they always want to repeat about your claim status? I told her that I always tell the agents not to waste my time by reading it. A couple of them agree and comply, but most say they are required to read it. She said that I was correct and the people who refuse are not following VA policy. Interesting...
Edited by Vync"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat
Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
2
1
Popular Days
Jan 27
9
Top Posters For This Question
Vync 4 posts
Buck52 2 posts
GBArmy 2 posts
paulstrgn 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 27 2020
9 posts
Popular Posts
GBArmy
Vync She told you " Depending on the findings and circumstances, employees may receive negative ratings on their performance reviews." What good would that do; it's a union job; nothing happens from i
Vync
I placed a number of calls to the WH VA Hotline recently about issues with various legitimate problems with the VA. This morning, I received a call from a supervisor with the National Work Queue (NWQ)
paulstrgn
GB I agree that it does not help the veteran it can actually impact the VA employee. If their rating is low they can be put on a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) and if they do not improve they can
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now