''This is VA's summary introduction to the proposed changes:''
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes its adjudication regulations relating to aggravation of service-connected disabilities to more clearly define ‘‘aggravation’’ in serviceconnection claims. The revisions would explicitly confirm a singular definition of ‘‘aggravation’’ that includes the requirement of ‘‘permanent worsening.’’ The revisions would also include minor organizational and technical changes.
Why Change the Definition ofAggravation?
The proposed changes will apply to both in-service aggravation of an existing condition2, and post-service aggravation of an existing condition by a service-connected disability.3
The following quote from the Federal Register provides the gist of VA's reasoning, but I encourage you to read the entire proposal for complete understanding.
The primary purpose of this proposed regulatory amendment is to provide asingular definition of ‘‘aggravation’’by clarifying two phrases contained within 38 CFR 3.306 and 3.310; specifically, ‘‘increase in disability’’ in section 3.306 and ‘‘any increase in severity’’ in section 3.310.
These phrases are not currently defined by statute or regulation, but rather by case law. ... Both 38 CFR 3.306 and 3.310 serve thesame ultimate goalof compensating veterans for increase in disability, whether based on aggravation of a preexisting disability (in-service context) or aggravation of a nonserviceconnected disability (post-service context).
Although these regulations are built on the same fundamental concepts, thedifferences in their wording have caused confusionover how to apply ‘‘aggravation’’ in both contexts.
Because the phrases ‘‘increase in disability’’ and ‘‘any increase in severity’’ are not clearly defined, there has beenuncertainty over what standard to usein determining whether ‘‘aggravation’’ is demonstrated.
The incongruent wording in these two regulations has been a consistent point of confusion andcontentionin the claims process, including on appeal.
Question
Buck52
"Permanent Worsening"
''This is VA's summary introduction to the proposed changes:''
Why Change the Definition of Aggravation?
The proposed changes will apply to both in-service aggravation of an existing condition2, and post-service aggravation of an existing condition by a service-connected disability.3
The following quote from the Federal Register provides the gist of VA's reasoning, but I encourage you to read the entire proposal for complete understanding.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
7
4
3
2
Popular Days
Sep 26
8
Sep 25
4
Sep 24
3
Sep 28
2
Top Posters For This Question
Tbird 7 posts
Buck52 4 posts
blahsaysme2u 3 posts
Marine Corp 69/70 2 posts
Popular Days
Sep 26 2020
8 posts
Sep 25 2020
4 posts
Sep 24 2020
3 posts
Sep 28 2020
2 posts
Popular Posts
Buck52
"Permanent Worsening" ''This is VA's summary introduction to the proposed changes:'' Why Change the Definition of Aggravation? The proposed changes will apply to both in-service aggra
Tbird
This is why it's so important to read the Federal Register https://community.hadit.com/forum/118-federal-register-announcements/
ShuMan
My believe is that there is an underestimation of what this can do to future claims. This is really setting up a lot of claims to fail (if this goes through).
21 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now