Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&P exam resulted in decreased rating

Rate this question


Squidward

Question

5 years ago I was rated at 60% for service connected disability, I was also given IU.

Not long after that the VA gave me 2 total hip replacements. 

Last month I was called in for a C&P exam for my right hip that was rated at 20% before the surgery.

I just got the results from the C&P exam and they reduced the rating on my right hip from 20% to 0%.

That will result in my overall rating to go from 60% down to 40% and I will lose my IU.

As per the rating rules, the minimum rating for a total hip replacement is 30% if it goes perfectly. 

Does this make any sense to anyone or is it an obvious mistake on their part?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Squidward Welcome to Hadit. What is the date on your decision letter? If it is over 5 years minimum, they are not supposed to reduce UNLESS you have more than one C&P exam. If it is less than 5 years, they can based on just one exam. If it is over 5 years and they are just now having a new look see after your operation, the VA has screwed up. They should have had another post-op exam after a year or so. Personally, with what you have on the line, I would consider getting a lawyer, if you get a proposed reduction. You need to beat this based on law, because I assume your condition after the replacement operation is better than before. If it is better, the VA bases disability on your symptoms and they may now be better than before your surgery. You would have to show your conditions are at least as bad as they were before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 4/5/2021 at 12:21 PM, GBArmy said:

Squidward Welcome to Hadit. What is the date on your decision letter? If it is over 5 years minimum, they are not supposed to reduce UNLESS you have more than one C&P exam. If it is less than 5 years, they can based on just one exam. If it is over 5 years and they are just now having a new look see after your operation, the VA has screwed up. They should have had another post-op exam after a year or so. Personally, with what you have on the line, I would consider getting a lawyer, if you get a proposed reduction. You need to beat this based on law, because I assume your condition after the replacement operation is better than before. If it is better, the VA bases disability on your symptoms and they may now be better than before your surgery. You would have to show your conditions are at least as bad as they were before.

The issue is that a total hip replacement is supposed to be rated at 30% minimum. That is in the rules so there is no way they can legitimately reduce it to 0%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

So there is no way they can legitimately rate my hip replacement any lower than 30%.

How did they possibility rate mine at 0%?

 

"All hip replacements are rated at least 30% disability irrespective of the effect on the veteran. Thus, if a veteran fully recovers from a hip replacement and is pain-free, a 30% disability rating is still assigned to them.Apr 15, 2020"

https://www.woodslawyers.com/hip-replacement-va-disability/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

As stated, you have to appeal. The VA makes mistakes all the time. I would go BVA with the request stating that the EED should be "X" because if you win and it is remanded back to the RO, you will get an inaccurate date anyway. If you request the date, perhaps the BVA will instruct on the remand "x" date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use