Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

AQ81 Proposed Rule Change for Mental Disorders

Rate this question


grayling12

Question

I have been reading the proposed rules for mental disorders and am curios as to whether I fully understand what they are saying.
My take on it is that they are adding a 10% rating and getting rid of the requirement that you can't work and receive a 100% rating.
This sounds good, but!
I am also reading that they are changing the general rating formula to include domains of functional impairment. These domains are based on cognition, interpersonal interactions and relationships, task completion and life activities, and navigating environments. Assigning a disability rating will be based on level of impairment (0-4), 4 in one or more domains or 3 in two or more domains is 100% etc.. It states "this criterion should generally lead to more generous compensation for veterans than the current rating formula", but!
It states that ability to work will be considered as well as the ameliorating effects of taking medications. In other words it sounds to me that if you hold down a job even with accommodations then they will count that against you. If you are taking medications and they help you, they will take that into consideration in lowering your rating as well as they will only rate the level of impairment above what the meds help with.
Does this sound like a correct interpretation of the rule change?
If this is correct then the only veterans that will benefit from this are vets that are so messed up that they can't work, as well as anyone that doesn't really want to get a job, this statement isn't meant to offend anyone, but is my interpretation. If you have to work to provide health insurance and financial support for your family then it sounds like you will be punished for it with a reduced rating. They are taking out the requirement that you can't work and receive 100%, but at the same time, if you take meds and hold down a job how would you ever qualify for 100% rating? Am I missing something or is my interpretation of the rule change correct? 
I would like as much feedback as possible. I want to know if i am misunderstanding the changes or not.
I realize that this is mental health related but would it be possible to leave it in the general forum to receive more feedback. If not then that is fine too. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I welcome the proposal to be able to work with 100% mental rating.  I'm rated at 100% ptsd/tbi and have been working all along.  I didn't hide it from anyone regarding VA.  I work in a sheltered environment (family business).  Otherwise, no, I wouldn't last at any job.  

I got into an argument with a fellow on another forum that had 100% ptsd rating and was a cop.  Now how in the hell does he still have a job with 100% ptsd?  I'm not ok with that situation.  Something isn't right with that deal.  Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well sometimes other vets do tell little white or red lies such as maybe being a cop with 100% mental rating.   I personally know several Army vets my age who lie about being Vietnam combat veterans when they never set foot in Vietnam and they also post BS on veterans benefits forums.  I have seen their DD214s shown to me by honest family members.  Yep BS walks and talks sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Founder

I think we can all agree some veterans lie and that is bad. Lets not have the discussion turn into one about that.

The poster @grayling12said they have been reading the proposed rules for mental disorders and was curios as to whether they fully understand what they are saying.

Please stay on topic here, start a new topic for other discussions so this posters thread does not get lost in a discussion that is not relevant to their question.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I felt a certain obligation to any new members seeing forum postings or new to the claims process to make them aware that some no name folks deliberately give out misleading info on other locations of course.  No one else is doing this but let it slide. No names of persons or forums or websites are ever revealed by me.  Shish!!!!!

At any rate I have recently and over the long haul achieved my main mission in life concerning the VA disability and Claims systems.  Others can fend for themselves. Soon departing on another fishing and camping trip to the scenic west coast.

I am very glad again and again I am not a military narrow-minded lifer.

Edited by Dustoff 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use