Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Should I refuse a c and p exam?

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

No.  You should attend the exam, when possible.  If you cant attend the exam, you should promptly notify VA, and comply with the regulations, to show "good cause" WHY NOT.   This is not open for debate, advising a Veteran to non comply with regulations is not in the Veterans best interests.  

Quote
§ 3.655 Failure to report for Department of Veterans Affairs examination.

(a) General. When entitlement or continued entitlement to a benefit cannot be established or confirmed without a current VA examination or reexamination and a claimant, without good cause, fails to report for such examination, or reexamination, action shall be taken in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) of this section as appropriate. Examples of good cause include, but are not limited to, the illness or hospitalization of the claimant, death of an immediate family member, etc. For purposes of this section, the terms examination and reexamination include periods of hospital observation when required by VA.

(b) Original or supplemental claim, or claim for increase. When a claimant fails to report for an examination scheduled in conjunction with an original compensation claim, the claim shall be rated based on the evidence of record. When the examination was scheduled in conjunction with any other original claim, a supplemental claim for a benefit which was previously disallowed, or a claim for increase, the claim shall be denied.

(c) Running award.

(1) When a claimant fails to report for a reexamination and the issue is continuing entitlement, VA shall issue a pretermination notice advising the payee that payment for the disability or disabilities for which the reexamination was scheduled will be discontinued or, if a minimum evaluation is established in part 4 of this title or there is an evaluation protected under § 3.951(b) of this part, reduced to the lower evaluation. Such notice shall also include the prospective date of discontinuance or reduction, the reason therefor and a statement of the claimant's procedural and appellate rights. The claimant shall be allowed 60 days to indicate his or her willingness to report for a reexamination or to present evidence that payment for the disability or disabilities for which the reexamination was scheduled should not be discontinued or reduced.

(2) If there is no response within 60 days, or if the evidence submitted does not establish continued entitlement, payment for such disability or disabilities shall be discontinued or reduced as of the date indicated in the pretermination notice or the date of last payment, whichever is later.

(3) If notice is received that the claimant is willing to report for a reexamination before payment has been discontinued or reduced, action to adjust payment shall be deferred. The reexamination shall be rescheduled and the claimant notified that failure to report for the rescheduled examination shall be cause for immediate discontinuance or reduction of payment. When a claimant fails to report for such rescheduled examination, payment shall be reduced or discontinued as of the date of last payment and shall not be further adjusted until a VA examination has been conducted and the report reviewed.

(4) If within 30 days of a pretermination notice issued under paragraph (c)(1) of this section the claimant requests a hearing, action to adjust payment shall be deferred as set forth in § 3.105(i)(1) of this part. If a hearing is requested more than 30 days after such pretermination notice but before the proposed date of discontinuance or reduction, a hearing shall be scheduled, but payment shall nevertheless be discontinued or reduced as of the date proposed in the pretermination notice or date of last payment, whichever is later, unless information is presented which warrants a different determination. When the claimant has also expressed willingness to report for an examination, however, the provisions of paragraph (c)(3) of this section shall apply.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)

Please do not advise Veterans to violate the law to obtain, or keep VA benefits.  It is hadit's policy to not allow Veterans to advise others to willfully violate regulations.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Founder
59 minutes ago, broncovet said:

No.  You should attend the exam, when possible.  If you cant attend the exam, you should promptly notify VA, and comply with the regulations, to show "good cause" WHY NOT.   This is not open for debate, advising a Veteran to non comply with regulations is not in the Veterans best interests.  

Please do not advise Veterans to violate the law to obtain, or keep VA benefits.  It is hadit's policy to not allow Veterans to advise others to willfully violate regulations.  

Do not advise veterans to refuse compensation and pension exams. See 38CFR3.655 38 CFR is the law.

38 CFR 3.655 (up to date as of 9-21-2022).pdf

image.png

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

NEWS FLASH

This is my experience and what happened to me and how I handled it. I am on the record for stating that a veteran should never refuse to go to an exam and my opinion is not changing but a veteran can inquire and or challenge an exam.

I have been posting that I filed two separate claims for EEDs, and the VA sent me to two separate LHI exams and the examiners wrote very favorable medical opinions. I really didn’t even remember this until this very morning, but I found out that during this time I was also scheduled an exam for my already service-connected mental health disorder. When I found out that I was scheduled for this third exam I contacted the LHI scheduling office and the VA to inquire why was this exam scheduled, I found out that certain exams may trigger a secondary mental health exam. I did not refuse to go to the exam I just called to find out who and why the exam was scheduled.

I told the LHI scheduling office and the VA that I did not file for an increase for my mental health disorder and that my claims for EEDs could possibly affect my combined rating due to the medical evidence is dated prior to my 100% scheduler P & T rating but since my mental health rating was already static for well over a decade and a half that it would not affect my combined rating in any way, shape or form.

I found out that one of the examiners scheduled me a mental health examination due to my service-connected disability because they are/were so close in proximity. The VA finally informed me that they did not order the mental health exam and the LHI scheduling office told me that one of the examiners did, but the mental health exam was cancelled, and I did not have to report to it. So, it could be that the exam could have been scheduled by either the VA or the contracting examination office.

So, I found out that some physical examinations could trigger a mental health examination, so it is possible that the VA or the contracting scheduling office is trying to properly evaluate the veteran's ratings. 

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
22 minutes ago, pacmanx1 said:

This is my experience and what happened to me and how I handled it. I am on the record for stating that a veteran should never refuse to go to an exam and my opinion is not changing but a veteran can inquiry and or challenge an exam.

same! and i love hearing your story and explanation...much better than my poor excuse of wording lol thanks to everyone here for putting this into perspective

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ok this is my last time even addressing this an veterans can choose to do what they feel is best for them.

ok.you guys are posting about the VA ordering exams to reexamine a condition.

We all understand that VA award that isn't pt they reexamine.

An you can't refuse that exam.

I a veteran feel that the VA is ordering exams over and over you can refuse anymore exams.

If the VA order exam for conditions you didn't claim. You can refuse the exam or cancel it.

If you apply for a condition or smc benefits and the VA try to open all your disability up for exams.

You can refuse or make a complaint to the white house hotline. An upload a statement.

My post is based on experience.

My post is based on a cavc remand I just received because they denied because I refuse the exam.

An didn't address any of my favorable evidence.

So to keep tell veterans they can do anything if the VA does something wrong.

Is a disservice to me.

I think most of us is here on hadit because the VA didn't follow the law.

This has got so bad now ppl are telling veterans.

The private contractor order the exams. Lol.

So tell a veteran a private contractor can just open all there disability to review.

Is that not a disservice.

The VA has to order exams the private contractor is to complete what they order.  Smh.

But this is my last post on these exams. 

Because you all can see what is going on.

Ever week there is a veteran post about unnecessary exams. 

An this is my opinion based off experience.

Not something a lawyer published on there web site 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, broncovet said:

Please do not advise Veterans to violate the law to obtain, or keep VA benefits.  It is hadit's policy to not allow Veterans to advise others to willfully violate regulations

We're have I ever told a veteran to violate the law. Lol. Smh.

Yea I think it's really time for me to give hadit a break. Things are alot different because this is crazy 

Man listen I fought the VA for Years for my benefits.

I understand the law. An have won many case pro SE  bva cavc because I understand the law.

An don't allow the VA to violate the law.

An like I said I post from experience.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

On more than one occassion, hadit members have missed exams, often because they were not informed of the c and p exam.  

Of course, its difficult to attend an exam, you did not know about until it was over!  

These Veterans had varying degrees of difficulty for missing these exams.  

Many reported how difficult it was to overcome a denial based on failure to report for an exam.  If you cant attend the exam, contact va right away, dont wait until they reduce your benefits 2 years later.  

Veterans need to keep VA informed of their address changes.  

The VA has a "presumption of regularity".  This means if VA sends you a notice of an exam to your "last known address" on file, its presumed you received the notice.  

Not everyone reads every piece of mail they receive.  Dont make that mistake with VA, it could be a notice of an impending c and p exam.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use