Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New rating?

Rate this question


Bluntly

Question

Greetings hadit family finally received my new rating on tbi that was a Bva remand and service connected on January of this year. Since service connection I had to attend 3 c&p exams in regards to the tbi, which were the following tbi, ptsd, and headaches. Today I received my new rating decision which they combined my tbi with ptsd but this didn’t change my overall percentage(70%). No increase on the ptsd and just 10% for the tbi.

In my rating decision it only talks about the tbi and ptsd exams with no mention of the headache exam. The headache exam was for residuals of the tbi, which was the last exam I did but no new rating in the decision letter in regards to that c&p exam. My question is how come I didn’t get a new rating for my headaches? Which is currently at 0%. Why send a veteran to a c&p exam if you’re not going to rate him? Thanks for your time and replies as any insights are appreciated as I figure out my appeal approach.

Edited by Bluntly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

There is an exceptionaly wide range of skill level and knowledge among VSO's.  

Some may actually understand VA laws better than a rookie attorney, inexperienced in Veterans law.  

Others, may have to have help in tying their shoes, or mess that up.  

Here is the problem, Highly skilled VSO's with an awesome record of helping vets win benefits are often so busy, they dont accept new claimants.  

However, rookies with no experience or knowledge, or lazy or incompetent VSO's usually have plenty of time to see you on their schedule.  Vets talk to each other and say, "Oh, hire this VSO, he knows his stuff", or Joe VSO wont return your phone calls because he is always drunk at the VFW beer hall.  

Often, when we go to see a VSO, we are directed by the secretary to a VSO who has an "open schedule".  Better is to wait for a pro VSO even if you have to wait 2 months to see him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@broncovet I appreciate the insight as always. I had a talk with DAV today for over 30 mins and he couldn’t identify the evidence that VA was talking about at all. I called the 1800# and was advised to just resubmit my claim as supplemental since they have the evidence that wasn’t considered already. She didn’t know also of this so called evidence they’re talking about. So I’m going to give it one more try before I take it to the board, as we know going to the BVA will take some years before my case can be heard. I just feel like I’m being set up for another denial since I can’t identify the actual evidence that is needed in a supplemental claim. I’ll post back once I get all this situated and Semper Fi to all continuing the fight with the VA. Lol it’s kind of ironic that I served 4 years and been to combat a couple times but been fighting the VA longer going on 8 years.

Edited by Bluntly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Look for evidence regarding "the basics", which are:

1.  Do you have a current diagnosis of condition claimed?

2.  How about an "in service event" you can point to that caused your malady?

3.  Is your nexus, linking 1 and 2 above, adequate?  Does the nexus contain language the VA understands, like "at least as likely as not"?  Is the c and p examiner competent in this field?  He/she should be an expert by education and experience in your chosen (disability) application.  Did your examiner give a medical rationale as to "why" he opined your condition is as likely as not from an event in military service?  Was the exam thorough, containing xrays or applicable other medical tests to confirm the diagnois?  

4.  Are your symptoms documented?  Did you show evidence of a worsening conditon in the event of an increase?  

     Im sure I forgot something about the nexus, but VA can be persnickity about the nexus.  This is especially true if another of your doctors gave unfavorable reports.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Greeter

I have gone the route of a HLR in a couple instances. One in which an error of reduction was fixed and the other for an increase that was denied. I know personally choose to skip the HLR as it is a waste of time and choose to go with a fair BVA decision. As they review your information and give reasons. What’s the update on your claim and did you choose to go to a HLR or BVA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use