Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Should I file PACT Act, Depressed Mood, Coronary Artery Disease, Spine/Neck

Rate this question


RichardZ

Question

Since 2015 when I retired I've been 80% which includes 60% Chronic Fatigue, 30% Insomnia, 10% Hemorrhoids.  My VA psychiatrist (who happens to also be the Hospital Chief of Staff) has strongly advised me multiple times to file for a service connection under the PACT Act.  I've strongly disagreed with him since I do not see a PACT Act connection (other than possibly using DEET and as supply troop regularly disposing of toxic substances - none identified in the PACT Act).   He, my psychiatrist has told me that it would likely get approved and I should say that toxin exposure has exacerbated my behavioral health issues.  I do not feel comfortable filing under the PACT Act however, I am considering asking VA to connect my Moderate/Major Depression Disorder and Anxiety disorder secondary to my rated Insomnia.  Also considering filing for my recently worsening coronary artery disease (CAD) and spinal stenosis, spinal disc disease.    Details follow and thanks in advance.  e

Recently, the VA noted my severe atherosclerosis in several CT Scans and in December 2023, I had stents put in 2 coronary arteries.  I have copies of my military medical records that show I was twice seen in the military for chest pain and several times prescribed crestor for high cholesterol.  Both of these military medical appointments were in the 1980s.   Though I've been taking crestor and other statins ever since.  

Also, since my retirement in 2015 I've had several  months long episodes of back and neck pain for which I've been seen by VA and civilian doctors.  In 2022, an MRI revealed multi-level severe disc degeneration, stenosis, and spondylosis of my sacral, lumbar, and cervical spine and ongoing tendonitus left scapula and shoulder.   I have been seen once on active duty for a cervical spine injury and one for a right shoulder injury.

So basically, I'm asking for advice on whether it's reasonable or not for me to proceed with claims for PACT Act, depression/anxiety, CAD, and/or spine/neck issues?

I only started thinking about this because my VA Psychiatrist has been almost pressuring me to file a PACT Act claim.  Until that, I never though about filing.  I'm retired, I have a good military and civil service retirement and am satisfied with the 80% rating I currently have.  Again much thanks in advance.  - Richard

 

 

Edited by RichardZ
mis spelled my name
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Anything you file as PACT is just your supposition that it might be. We still have to consider it on a direct basis as well. Even if you never left the States you can still fall under PACT due to TERA opinions (toxic exposure risk activities). TERA is basically anything that would show up on the hazardous in some way MSDN list as a civilian product. DEET shows up on the list under Gulf War veterans so it would also be folded into PACT. PACT isn't so much its own thing as it is an extension of what was already considered under GW but adding some locations and extending timeframes.  Youd be surprised what shows up under PACT- we run your name through a database from the DOD called ILER that cross-references your MOS, your various duty locations, and what substances you might have come into contact with. We then have to document the relative totality of your contact through your time in service. We can't just point to that time you were in Djibouti and stop- we have to list possibly significant proximal exposure wherever you were, domestic and abroad- it takes a few minutes, LOL. But, with that, if we can't point to a direct thing(s) that falls under PACT as presumptive we can still ask for an opinion about whatever contention you are claiming on the basis of overall exposure.

Hypercholesterolemia or elevated serum (blood) cholesterol is not a disability for which VA compensation benefits are payable. Diagnoses of hyperlipidemia, elevated triglycerides, and elevated cholesterol are laboratory results and are not, in and of themselves, disabilities. 61 Fed. Reg. 20,440 (May 7, 1996). I don't write the laws that's just what they are. 

The physical pain/spine issues shouldn't be too hard to service connect provided you can identify in-service event(s) that would plausibly represent the beginning of what you have now. If you had no complaints or treatment in service, nothing on your SEP exam, and you've never been treated for it until the last few years it's going to be more difficult, though. Some MOS's we can take pretty easily as causing those types of issues- if you were an 11B or have an ice cream cone with wings or something then yeah, you probably have back, knee, foot issues. If you were an intelligence guy in a bunker in the AF for 10 yrs, well, that's more of a challenge. 

 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The VA is gonna require MEDICAL EVIDENCE for service connection.  Not your opinion, not my opinion, and not the presidents opinon..but a medical opinion.  

Your doctor has just pretty much told you what you need to do to get Service connected.  You do not have to take his advice, BUT, if you do want to be service connected the easy/best way is to take his advice, and the hard way is to disagree with him.  This is especially true when he pretty much told you if you apply, he will provide the medical evidence necessary for your claim to suceed.  

If it were me, and, I was looking at the same thing a number of years ago, and, yes, I took my doctors advice and it was the best thing I did.  He provided a nexus, which is "the" evidence I needed for service connection.  

Your doctor has "handed you the W" (win), and, yes, you can be too proud to take it, but some point down the road you will likely regret not taking his advice.  

Two choices:

1.  Take the doctors advice, and get service connected.  Let's assume you are right, the doc is wrong, for a moment.  Call the VA, tell them you feel fine, you have no problems with pact act or toxic exposure, you are able to work just fine, and dont need disability compensation and they can keep their money and you have a good job and dont need it.  GReat.  

2.  Decline the doctor adivce.  Now, 2 possible things can happen:

     A.  The doc is right, you need compensation are sick and need benefits.  Now, you have to try to undo the mistake you made trying to decline the docs advice.  That may not be easy to back off.  

      B.  You are correct, and, again, you dont need the money, are not sick, and dont need the compensation as you can make good money working a job as you feel no ills from toxic exposure.  

The hard way to is to fight the doc.  The easy way is to embrace the doc and do what he says.  

     Many Vets would love to be in your shoes.  They have to fight the doc.  The doc is trying to talk them out of pact act, applying for SC.  Your doc is giving you a gift.  Accept the gift, and if it turns out you dont need it, well, give it back.  Your doc has seen many patients and understands the progression of the disease and you probably dont.  He is acting in your best interest.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi brothers (and/or sisters).  Hey I'm the OP.  I sure appreciate your detailed feedback, info, advice and will read several more times.  

I've got a follow on question regarding applying for service connection under the PACT Act.   Where within the VA.gov website disability application process does one indicate that they are applying under or associated with the PACT Act? 

I was on VA.Gov for awhile today and as I progressed through starting a new claim I expected to find a screen, box, or field where a vet would indicate they were applying for service connection under the PACT Act.  Do I have to name the disability first for example recurrent major depression episodes and then subsequent to that on the website/app indicate that I'm applying under the PACT Act?  Thanks.  I'd ideally just like to apply for connection and be noted that I'm covered under the PACT Act alone without immediately naming a medical condition. 

Much thanks once again.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
Posted (edited)

Just write it off to the side, or type it as part of the contention name - DEET Exposure-PACT; toxic Substances disposal-PACT. 

For “toxic disposal” you’ll  need to list at least something that was being disposed of, though, like chemical, or ordinance, or at least “particulate matter”. “Disposal of toxic substances” without saying what it was isn’t a claimable contention in an of itself. 
 

We (VSR) are supposed to look at your dates and locations of service and liberally consider anything that might be PACT, but we still have to know what substance(s) you are claiming. We can look you up in a DOD database but that only lists potential exposures. You have to tell us what, in general. 
 

What is your nexus for depression/etc and PACT? I’d claim the physical stuff (not under PACT- phys stuff, generally,  can’t be claimed under PACT) and the depression secondary to that, also. You can claim the same thing more than one way. I’m SC for back and related nerve pain w/ depression secondary to it, for example. 

Edited by brokensoldier244th

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted (edited)

I wrote, PACT ACT claim for bladder cancer, Agent Orange.  Whatever you handled or were exposed to.  I do not think it matters if you are not on the presumptive list of PACT ACT exposure locations as long as the substances were where you were, and military records will show that.  Mine was easy.  For yours, it may require the RO to do a little research.  But with your medical opinion, it should not be a problem.  Just may take a lot longer than mine did.

Edited by Lemuel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

OP again here - Much thanks again for the well written guidance.  it's really helped me get my brain around this. 

Pretty sure I'll complete the PACT Act request this week.  Seems having this on my VA file will qualify me presumptively for issues that may come up later.  A

s a medical logistics troop from 1981-2000 (significant AD periods 1981-1985; 1991) my daily duties included personally opening with my hands and disposing outdated and suspended medications, medical cleaners, biological agents, vaccines, laboratory reagents, and insect repellants.   In the 1980s I was the junior member of a two-person medical logistics office so was the one doing most of the hands on destructions.  I listed this and several other TDY locations in my claim where I participated in this same standard medical logistics task.

Next week or later I may request separately the cardiac stuff and back stuff.    I may also request the depression secondary to my rating for insomnia. Much thanks again.  Hoping I've enough for VA to approve the PACT Act.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use