Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bva Report

Rate this question


Berta

Question

They ARENT blaming the VCAA- the VCAA was supposed to get better claims work done right at the RO level by specifically telling the vet and their rep what they needed BEFORE any denial of the claim.

BEFORE the denial of the claim----

The Buffalo VARO has 2 stacks of claims.

one stack is the claims that will get a proper legal VCAA letter and election notice- the other stack gets a generic letter that is illegal because it is not specific to the claim.These claimants do not get an election form and none of the RO claimants get the VCAA pamphlet that explains the whole VCAA and their rights.

If the POA does not wuestion this- nor the veteran- those claims are doomed from the git go.Doomed.

I am trying to find out who determines at the RO what claims go into each stack.

The proof of what I am saying is at the BVA web site.

I have taken a stand and continue to put pressure on the State of NY to

see why their vet reps are not questioning claimants who never get a legal VCAA letter.

Some of their reps have sat back since 2000 (VCAA law date)and did not advise the vet what they needed because the VA never told the vet on the legal VCAA letter.

This letter tells the vet exactly what they need to provide to the VA.

Just yesterday I found a 2006 NYSDVA claim at the BVA.

The vet had been denied in 2004-meaning he filed the claim probably in 2003---I think his BVA decision was dated Dec 2006-

The vet had PTSD diagnosis and proof of his stressor.

The BVA immediately award the claim.

Of course they had to send it back to Buffalo to be rated.

The veteran with NYSDVA on the brief- NEVER got a legal-VCAA letter.

On his own he obtained proof of his stressor.

The BVA said the VCAA error was not prejudicial-

but this vet waiting 4 years and now might still be waiting for his claim to be rated and he had everything he needed early on.

Someone at the Buffalo RO determines which claimant gets a legal VCAA letter and election form and who doesnt.

NYSDVA goes along with their decision- and does not appear to ever question the lack of proper notice.

The BVA web site and my own claims prove this point.

I cant fight over every vet orgs involvement in this scam-

I am fighting very hard to get this rectified for vets and widows with NYSDVA on their POA-with claims filed at the Buffalo VARO.

Any NYSDVA claimant who has been adversely affected in this way please post something and I will contact you by email-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

John- The 2006 VBM has extensive info under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act-

Ron Abrams- one of the lawyers who writes the VBM told me I made some very good moves when I got that fast BVA remand due to VCAA violations-

As a veterans advocate I didn't even know what a real VCAA letter involved-and when I became a claimant in 2003 after last being one in 1997-I still had no idea that what I got was an illegal VCAA notice.Then I got smart.

I am contacting NVLSP to put a real VCAA example in the VBM-

but they might already have one there-

will check-

I also read in the VBM that the VA doesn't send VCAA letters on CUES-

I was promised 2 on CUE claims-by the VSM-but of course they never came-

Angela-there is a lot at hadit on Cue claims and also the VCAA.

I am confused with your issue- but if you have medical evidence that puts you into the 100% criteria and they did not use this evidence-

you could attempt to ask them to CUE themselves on that decision and tell them you did not receive proper VCAA letter.

If the VCAA letter you got did NOT specifically have an italizied or underlined statement-specific to your claim- as to exactly what they need, and if the letter did NOT come with an election form-it is an illegal VCAA letter.

If the VCAA letter did comply with the VCAA regs do you have time to ask the VA to reconsider their decision based on your evidence?

I posted at hadit info as to how the I-9 should be prepared.

I sent an I-9 in Jan 2006. It passed through many hands and got 3 authorizor signatures. months passed and other movement appeared on the VA computer screen. and then in July I got the notice of transfer to the BVA.No one even read the first page of it at my VARO.

I raised hell. They are reading it well now.

Someone posted a real VCAA letter here at hadit about a year ago.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use