Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Just Something To Read About The Latest House Of Va Hearings

Rate this question


spike

Question

I figured this is something that should be read here.....It affects all those who have PTSD, Unemployability, etc. It is a Cut and Post from a Larry Scott article.

The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs held a roundtable discussion on PTSD on Wednesday, May16, 2007.The full witness list is here... http://veterans.house.gov/

hearings/schedule110/may07/05-16-07/witness.shtml

Rep. Steve Buyer (R-IN), Ranking Minority Member, invited Dr. Sally Satel to testify. Satel is the paid mouthpiece of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. Satel's disrespect for veterans with PTSD is a matter of legend. Buyer's "suck it up soldier" attitude is also well-known.

Satel's "blame the veteran" approach is not well-received in the medical community. Quote: "Blaming the veteran for psychological reactions to war fosters stigma, a major reason why veterans do not seek mental health assistance." John A. Fairbank, Ph.D.

For more an Satel, use the VA Watchdog search engine. You'll be amazed at some of the things she has said. Search engine here... http://www.yourvabenefits.org/

What we heard from Satel and Buyer was the "M&M" agenda...minimize and marginalize...that is, minimize the disorder and that marginalizes the veteran. It's a tired old tactic.

Here are Rep. Buyer's opening remarks where he says that PTSD is often used as an "umbrella" and a "catch-all" for any mental disorder...click here to listen or download MP3, 3:36 in length.

Satel's remarks were equally repugnant. She talked about "recovery" and confusing PTSD with other disorders such as phobias, depression and anxiety. She says the VA should be careful of granting 100% benefits for PTSD. Satel added that there must be a "high threshold" for granting PTSD benefits, work is the best therapy and PTSD is a "time-limited" affliction. Here are Satel's opening remarks...click here to listen or download MP3, 9:01 in length.

Later in the hearing there was discussion of "return to work" programs for veterans with PTSD who receive unemployability benefits.

The hearing lasted over 2 hours and 40 minutes. Complete audio is here... http://veterans.house.gov/

hearings/schedule110/may07/05-16-07/05-16-07.wma

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • In Memoriam

If you listen to the 181 minute audio (Va watchdog.org) of the round table hearing by Congressman Bob Filner, you will hear buzzers, cross-talking, back ground Megaphones from outside, an different noises in the background in a show of how Sally's voice and theory is nothing more than propaganda.

In the audio hearing Sally, said that her experience came from the years of 1988 through 1992 at the Cross-Bones University (Yale). Could there be some connection here?

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points stretch. This is a typical tactic used by politicians to sell an outrageous idea....they conflate something that is moderately true (early intervention can help) with something that has NO proof like claiming that 100% (severe) PTSD vets can be "cured" by sending them to work. I just found it disturbing that no one even questioned those claims or asked for even a hint of proof. Sure, therapy helps some vets deal with PTSD symptoms, but it is very rare that therapy will have any large impact on a very severe PTS case, because severe PTSD involves sooo many other factors (depression, suicidal/homicidal ideation, hallucinations, OCD, GAD, etc, etc).

The real disturbing thing to me is this notion that PTSD can be "cured" at ANY level. How can one cure something when they don't even know what it is?? Ask ANY psychiatrist what PTSD is (be sure that they don't merely list "symptoms")...they can't do it, because they don't truly know what causes it.

"Curing" PTSD would be like saying you "cured" a broken arm with morphine. What you've really done, in that example, is treat a symptom, which is all therapy and drugs can do for PTSD. The best one can hope for with PTSD is to learn to diminish their symptoms and/or learn to live a decent life with said symptoms.

Interesting fact: Did you know that parkinson's disease is basically identical (physiologically speaking) to schizophrenia (and other symptoms like depression, hallucinations, etc)? They both involve abnormal levels of dopamine (one being too high and one being too low). Could you imagine a parkinson's patient walking into a doctor's office and being told, "it's all in your head; get a job and use self-talk"?? No, that would be absurd. Yet, we tell people with physical problems in their heads (PTSD) that they should, in essence, "walk it off". It's a huge double standard and the field of psychiatry doesn't want to admit it because they want people to keep coming to them for a "cure".

The future of psychiatry is in the bio-medical side of things. PTSD, and other afflictions, are PHYSICAL disorders and, in time, we will know exactly how and why people have PTSD. But, for now, we let these over-educated retards spout their opinions as if they're facts, just because they spent 8 yrs in college and studied that idiot freud.

P.S. Interesting fact on freud: His theories are basically bent on the idea that all of our current problems have ties to childhood. Did you know that freud never studied children? How does one make such strong ties to development at a young age without ever having done studies on kids? What a joke:-)

Edited by Jay Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay

Freud started out as a child psych. Most of them were during that period. They evolved into so-called higher forms and or levels of psych. As you know, a great portion of his a work was however based on lies and inflated stats! Majority of his research was conducted on his own CRAZY CHILDREN and his poor wife! He had a deep seeded hate for women. Well most women. Let's face it, the dude was a QUACK! If he were alive today, he would fit right in with the other quacks at the VA!

Take care and have a great day

Good points stretch. This is a typical tactic used by politicians to sell an outrageous idea....they conflate something that is moderately true (early intervention can help) with something that has NO proof like claiming that 100% (severe) PTSD vets can be "cured" by sending them to work. I just found it disturbing that no one even questioned those claims or asked for even a hint of proof. Sure, therapy helps some vets deal with PTSD symptoms, but it is very rare that therapy will have any large impact on a very severe PTS case, because severe PTSD involves sooo many other factors (depression, suicidal/homicidal ideation, hallucinations, OCD, GAD, etc, etc).

The real disturbing thing to me is this notion that PTSD can be "cured" at ANY level. How can one cure something when they don't even know what it is?? Ask ANY psychiatrist what PTSD is (be sure that they don't merely list "symptoms")...they can't do it, because they don't truly know what causes it.

"Curing" PTSD would be like saying you "cured" a broken arm with morphine. What you've really done, in that example, is treat a symptom, which is all therapy and drugs can do for PTSD. The best one can hope for with PTSD is to learn to diminish their symptoms and/or learn to live a decent life with said symptoms.

Interesting fact: Did you know that parkinson's disease is basically identical (physiologically speaking) to schizophrenia (and other symptoms like depression, hallucinations, etc)? They both involve abnormal levels of dopamine (one being too high and one being too low). Could you imagine a parkinson's patient walking into a doctor's office and being told, "it's all in your head; get a job and use self-talk"?? No, that would be absurd. Yet, we tell people with physical problems in their heads (PTSD) that they should, in essence, "walk it off". It's a huge double standard and the field of psychiatry doesn't want to admit it because they want people to keep coming to them for a "cure".

The future of psychiatry is in the bio-medical side of things. PTSD, and other afflictions, are PHYSICAL disorders and, in time, we will know exactly how and why people have PTSD. But, for now, we let these over-educated retards spout their opinions as if they're facts, just because they spent 8 yrs in college and studied that idiot freud.

P.S. Interesting fact on freud: His theories are basically bent on the idea that all of our current problems have ties to childhood. Did you know that freud never studied children? How does one make such strong ties to development at a young age without ever having done studies on kids? What a joke:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

With democrats in control of congress and soon to be in the Whitehouse the evil plans of Bush & Co. to screw PTSD and IU vets won't be realized. He wants to do as much damage as possbile before he leaves. I am sure the neo-cons would like to privatise the VA and sell it off to their buddies to reap a profit from the broken bodies of vets. Profit is what drives them and payoffs for their friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Has anyone ever researched to see just what the political affiliation of VA employees are?

It would be interesting to see if it's stacked like the Justice dept. An ultra Conservative at every management, adjudication, directors, etc? Always making sure the money flows one way?

These people act like the KKK when it comes to the determination to hate vets.

Laws need to be passed to protect Vets from special interest hate groups like these, from continually atacking benefits of veterans, delaying proceedings to "assist" vets during a war.

They are just not comfortable with telling such young adults, just how messed up they are. So they feel instead of cutting these people their checks for getting them messed up, they're going to cheat them out of it, keep them from going home & getting normalized, than brain washing them in to thinking they don't deserve the rating for what hell they've been through.

How are these hate groups alowed to be in a position to assist veterans in any way? They're droids! They don't even think like humans.

I won't go to these people for mental health. I've been up against these types before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Jay 

Freud started out as a child psych. Most of them were during that period. They evolved into so-called higher forms and or levels of psych. As you know, a great portion of his a work was however based on lies and inflated stats! Majority of his research was conducted on his own CRAZY CHILDREN and his poor wife! He had a deep seeded hate for women. Well most women. Let's face it, the dude was a QUACK! If he were alive today, he would fit right in with the other quacks at the VA!

Take care and have a great day

Couldn't have sad it better myself.

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use