Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod For Headaches - 2004

Rate this question


Josephine

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I want to receive my husband's 11 years of retro before I stir up

much.

I did call the toll free number today to ask them about my NOD for

headaches. They said they had no record of it, only a NOD for chronic

anxiety.

Well bless Pete, I had the letter from the DRO stating he had

received my NOD of the March 2004 decision for service connection

for chronic anxiety and service connection for headaches dated July

2004.

I have been around the block with the appeal on the chronic anxiety

and never had a chance to mention the NOD also included headaches.

The R.O has been telling me I had not filed one. Yes, I did.

The guy typed in some info to re-open the headache claim and said the

R.O would be asking for a copy of this letter within the next three

weeks.

He said an error had been made. This was to also re-open the claim

for headaches back to 1992. ( I gave up on the 1978)

Now, I need to wait on the TDIU Form is this correct?

Thanks,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

In addition to the NOD - did you perfect the appeal for headaches too? I know it would be hard to sort out because they messed the whole thing around playing games. I think that is part of the game - tying the whole claim in knots.

Do your doctors say your headaches are related to the anxiety. Or are they still calling them vascular?

If you mentioned the headaches on the perfected appeal, as well as the NOD - OR even mentioned ALL issues, or something like that - then you could ask them to adjudicate your unadjudicated headache appeal.

If they did - that would certainly save time for sure. Rather than taking it back up through the BVA.

I would also hold off on mentioning they are totally controlled by medicine on the TDIU claim....as long as you have an active claim on them. Kind of leave it where you can go either way on the issue. Or rather than say they are controlled by medicine - mention the headaches are being TREATED with medication - as they HAVE BEEN SINCE SERVICE - and though they are disabling, they don't have near the impact on your employability as your anxiety does.

Free

I want to receive my husband's 11 years of retro before I stir up

much.

I did call the toll free number today to ask them about my NOD for

headaches. They said they had no record of it, only a NOD for chronic

anxiety.

Well bless Pete, I had the letter from the DRO stating he had

received my NOD of the March 2004 decision for service connection

for chronic anxiety and service connection for headaches dated July

2004.

I have been around the block with the appeal on the chronic anxiety

and never had a chance to mention the NOD also included headaches.

The R.O has been telling me I had not filed one. Yes, I did.

The guy typed in some info to re-open the headache claim and said the

R.O would be asking for a copy of this letter within the next three

weeks.

He said an error had been made. This was to also re-open the claim

for headaches back to 1992. ( I gave up on the 1978)

Now, I need to wait on the TDIU Form is this correct?

Thanks,

Betty

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

In addition to the NOD - did you perfect the appeal for headaches too? I know it would be hard to sort out because they messed the whole thing around playing games. I think that is part of the game - tying the whole claim in knots.

Actually today is the first day the VA has even recognized there was a NOD. Considering Dr. Lexxx made such a big splash about the headaches being my problem in service, hard to tell what they will do with it now.

Do your doctors say your headaches are related to the anxiety. Or are they still calling them vascular?

Migraine with E.R visits for shots of Demerol for years and years.

I will have to go back through the mess again. Perhaps this time, the VA will have to acknowledge the post medical records from 1965 - 1979.

If you mentioned the headaches on the perfected appeal, as well as the NOD - OR even mentioned ALL issues, or something like that - then you could ask them to adjudicate your unadjudicated headache appeal.

Yes the headaches are mentioned as # 1 chronic anxiety, #2. headaches. The VA should be able to use the records they already have to rate this claim and they can also use their Non Service Connected Records.

If they did - that would certainly save time for sure. Rather than taking it back up through the BVA.

This one will have to first be decided by the DRO. I have never received anything from the VA except. Receipt of the NOD. This was done when I turned in both the " New and both Material evidence.

Remember the NSC rated headaches at 10%

I would also hold off on mentioning they are totally controlled by medicine on the TDIU claim....as long as you have an active claim on them.

I will for I live off of medication for them. They are not as bad as they used to be, but then again I live off sedatives.

Kind of leave it where you can go either way on the issue. Or rather than say they are controlled by medicine - mention the headaches are being TREATED with medication - as they HAVE BEEN SINCE SERVICE - and though they are disabling, they don't have near the impact on your employability as your anxiety does.

That would be the truth.

I will be anxious to see what they do with this one. Of course this is mentioned on my form - 9 - No one will address my NOD for headaches.

Thanks,

Betty

Free

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use