Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Why Do We Take It?

Rate this question


SouthernBelle

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I know this has been said before, but we don't have to take this. Why can't we do the same things the Presidential candidates are doing and start raising money to get every Veteran who is able to travel to descend upon Washington D.C. and demand something. What is stopping us? Is it because the Bonus Army didn't get what they wanted when they wanted it? I don't think so. GDSnide said it right. FEAR. People are afraid now. But what are we afraid of? We don't have to take it. Hundreds of people doing small things are great, and can't be downplayed, but at the same time, if we had a massive group of Veterans marching in DC that would get attention. We could run adverts on TV, radio, and get the local news involved. Start raising money. It may take a few years to get enough money for every Veteran ABLE to travel to come, but we've got time. We're sitting here waiting on the VA to give what EVERY AMERICAN VETERAN DESERVES. Lets stop talking about how bad it is, and lets actually do something BIG. There are people on here with VERY good contacts in Congress. Give them the CHANCE to fix the system, and if they don't, then we go, if they do fix it, we donate the or put into a trust the money raised. The trust can be used for Veterans and their families who are still waiting, or if there is an emergency. What is stopping us? If those of us on THIS forum can't get together, then NOBODY can, so lets do it! We ought to prove that a nonviolent "PROTEST" still works wonders.

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

Edited by SouthernBelle

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

SouthernBelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Belle:

Whatever the VA does to your husband should be of grave concern to you. Sometimes when we are not up to a fight its our spouse who stands in for what is needed

I appreciate your advocacy and wish that there were many more like you.

Great post Pete53..........

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Unfortunately, the WWI veterans tried to do something similar about promised pensions that were deliberately delayed until many of the veterans had passed away. The end result was that the army was called out to remove them from Washington.

One of the many current problems is simply that veterans bills etc. are classed under the "revenue neutral" category.

The next issue, which is a major one, is that veteran related funding is not a mandatory part of military appropriations on a percentage basis.

Finally, veterans are in a class that the government considers of lower importance than others.

A. The usefulness of the disabled veteran is nil/negative to the government.

B. The disabled veteran is a burden on the government due to the obligation the government has. In the government's way of bureaucratic and political thinking, the impact of such obligations should be minimized any way possible.

I know this has been said before, but we don't have to take this. Why can't we do the same things the Presidential candidates are doing and start raising money to get every Veteran who is able to travel to descend upon Washington D.C. and demand something. What is stopping us? Is it because the Bonus Army didn't get what they wanted when they wanted it? I don't think so. GDSnide said it right. FEAR. People are afraid now. But what are we afraid of? We don't have to take it. Hundreds of people doing small things are great, and can't be downplayed, but at the same time, if we had a massive group of Veterans marching in DC that would get attention. We could run adverts on TV, radio, and get the local news involved. Start raising money. It may take a few years to get enough money for every Veteran ABLE to travel to come, but we've got time. We're sitting here waiting on the VA to give what EVERY AMERICAN VETERAN DESERVES. Lets stop talking about how bad it is, and lets actually do something BIG. There are people on here with VERY good contacts in Congress. Give them the CHANCE to fix the system, and if they don't, then we go, if they do fix it, we donate the or put into a trust the money raised. The trust can be used for Veterans and their families who are still waiting, or if there is an emergency. What is stopping us? If those of us on THIS forum can't get together, then NOBODY can, so lets do it! We ought to prove that a nonviolent "PROTEST" still works wonders.

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You're talking about the Bonus Army. I'm well versed in their cause and the outcome. I'd like to have a mission statement that encompasses not only assistance for Veterans but legislative action and changing the ways Veterans are looked at by our government. They are not just Veterans. They've been in the Military, which makes them soldiers and if there's one thing I've learned, it is that you can take the soldier out of the Military, but it is a much larger, if not impossible task, to take the Military out of the soldier. So these Veterans aren't just a Veterans Affairs issue, they are a Military issue as well and should be treated fairly and compassionately. Currently, like you said, they're not considered "useful" by our government, which is unfortunate and ultimately wrong. I may be rambling now. I'll stop.

Unfortunately, the WWI veterans tried to do something similar about promised pensions that were deliberately delayed until many of the veterans had passed away. The end result was that the army was called out to remove them from Washington.

One of the many current problems is simply that veterans bills etc. are classed under the "revenue neutral" category.

The next issue, which is a major one, is that veteran related funding is not a mandatory part of military appropriations on a percentage basis.

Finally, veterans are in a class that the government considers of lower importance than others.

A. The usefulness of the disabled veteran is nil/negative to the government.

B. The disabled veteran is a burden on the government due to the obligation the government has. In the government's way of bureaucratic and political thinking, the impact of such obligations should be minimized any way possible.

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

SouthernBelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I see it, there is but one other group of people who are treated worse than we are and has had as much if not poorer treatment and have poorer results trying to get what is due them and that is the Native Americans who were killed, abused, put on reservations so they could control them better, and many other wrongs that they have yet and it is doubtfull they will ever get any just or equitable relief from our government over land stolen and treatese broken and money owed due to outright lies, mismanagement and outright theft, that had you or I done these things, would have spent the rest of our lives in jail for.

The African Americans and others of color, are only slightly above us in there treatment by our government. We fight and die for our country and then are soon forgotten as the Veterans claims are delayed, denied, hoping we will go away or die before they are finally forced to approve our claims.

The only way I see something happening, is to do it state by state, every veteran living in a particular state, marching on that states capital, submitting a patition signed by all, no matter what their Political affiliation, promising to vote against re-election of anyone who is in office at the time, if the Veterans needs are not met. I would hazzard to guess that their are enough swing votes by Veteran's that could prove fatal to an incumbant, should all the veterans vote against re-electing anyone who fails to do anything to bring about an effective change in the VA.

Veterans must stand together, regardless of being Republican or Democrat, or Independant. If the polaticians feared they would be voted out of office they might just do something constructive to help Veterans and improving conditions at the VA.

IMHO

Rockhound Rider :angry:

Voting for an incumbent this year only means the same old things will go on, that does nothing to improve Veteran issue's. We have to vote as one to make a difference.

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Local VA bosses hate to be put on the spot by the people they are supposed to serve. They are not used to it. They can't hide as well as those guys in Washington. If you can get to the local guys you can really cook them in the local newspapers. Ask William who posts from St. Petersburg. He gets calls from the St. Pete Times looking for more dirt on the local VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'm looking for dirt on them right now.

Local VA bosses hate to be put on the spot by the people they are supposed to serve. They are not used to it. They can't hide as well as those guys in Washington. If you can get to the local guys you can really cook them in the local newspapers. Ask William who posts from St. Petersburg. He gets calls from the St. Pete Times looking for more dirt on the local VA.

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

SouthernBelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use