Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Thank You Berta!

Rate this topic


yoggie2

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think the VA is just trying their best to not pay for PTSD claims if there is any way they can get out of it. They see the tidal wave coming at them, and they are bailing as fast as they can which means automatic denials. They know some will just give up, some will fight and lose and some will win. Anything to save a buck! Persistence and evidence will win the claims game. What is a crime is that vets have to go through the washer/dryer cycle to get their compensation. The stressor verification gambit is really a crock. It should be presumptive for anyone who was in a combat zone. If you were in a combat zone and have PTSD it should be presumptive. Yes, some will fake it, but most with real PTSD will benefit. The VA now punishes all vets for the sins of a few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I think the VA is just trying their best to not pay for PTSD claims if there is any way they can get out of it. They see the tidal wave coming at them, and they are bailing as fast as they can which means automatic denials. They know some will just give up, some will fight and lose and some will win. Anything to save a buck! Persistence and evidence will win the claims game. What is a crime is that vets have to go through the washer/dryer cycle to get their compensation. The stressor verification gambit is really a crock. It should be presumptive for anyone who was in a combat zone. If you were in a combat zone and have PTSD it should be presumptive. Yes, some will fake it, but most with real PTSD will benefit. The VA now punishes all vets for the sins of a few.

I agree JOHN999, I was talking another board member the other night and I think he is correct, since the claims for PTSD and the help from VSO filing the claims for them right off the planes the VARO are going to put a Holt in some way to these PTSD claims. When I filed my claim it was by my self no "VSO" didn't even know what it was when I went for help (back when I didn't know crapola) I was told I had to be service connected, I stated I was treated in service but didn't matter so I did the paper work my self had no idea what I was doing but filed any ways, 3 months later I hooked up with VFW they told me I took the long way around so they put in the claim again for me 3 months after that I got a reply in NOV05 by then they started to treat me I waited since MAY05 then my claim got C&P'd JAN08 and denied in 12FEB08. Now with that being said 2006, 2007, 2008 has saw record PTSD claims. Don't take it personal you all but I felt screwed over I waited and waited was passed over, over because new veterans had priority and by it was my turn my claim was unimportant and by this time they have a PTSD epidemic going on and they just saw me filing a claim just cause everyone else was and it pisses me off to no end to get treated like a welfare case after 8 years of service. And in the end its your screwed up but its your parents fault kinda with the VA. I have 4 Doc's now that call it PTSD might fool 1 but not all and the VA calls it a BPD gaf 40, that makes 5 doc's and I have never paid for 1 IMO. I know I will win in the end...But I feel you are right someone farts and we all have to smell it.

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I believe every denied claim should be reviewed by a review system that is not controlled by the VA.

Further, that only granted claims will be used to accumulate the "points" required by the VA production standards. After all, the VA is supposedly in existence to grant claims when reasonable and possible.

NOT to take the opposite path of denial whenever possible by any means at hand.

"None of this crap happened overnight either and I think every single denied claim should be suspect for some sort of VA shinanigans."

It really makes me wonder-

how they can damage OUR integrity is just unacceptable to me-

I found out recently that when I filed a Tort for wrongful death years ago -the VA had actually done 4 or 5 medical reviews on the claim-

I was aware of the first one- within months after filing the FTCA and Sec1511 claim the VA had obtained a medical review that supported my charges that they killed my husband-verified by the regional counsel and even the doctor who prepared the report-

The report which supported these claims vanished-so did they-

(the doc and the RC retired)

Then VACO prepared a report that was faulty and I questioned it aggressively and then -upon receipt of the evidence that I realised the RO had withheld from them(can you imagine that-the RO selectively sent the head cardiologist in DC only some of the C file and med recs)I won the FTCA and ultimately the DIC claim under 1151.

I just found out that two other medical reports were solicited by the VA-one from O LM VA in Buffalo and one fasked for by another VA attorney in VACO.I guess those reports too supported my claim- if they were negative this would have given the VA more Ammo to deny.

I have asked the VA Office of Legal Medical some tough questions.

Since when does the VA solicit medical reports on ANY type of claim and then the reports never see the light of day?

The more questions I have been asking lately , the more information I have found out as to just how determined VA was to deny my wrongful death claim.

This is wrong. And I believe this has happened to many others with FTCA or Section 1151 claims.

It just goes to show how defiant the VA is and this is a travesty against veterans and widows of vets.

Someone makes decisions at our ROs that determines whose claim will succeed and whose wont.(By determining if the evidence gets read)

That decision might be made by some new and yet fully untrained employee or an imbecle who can't read or perhaps by a very well seasoned employee with some bias against the claimant.

None of this crap happened overnight either and I think every single denied claim should be suspect for some sort of VA shinanigans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe every denied claim should be reviewed by a review system that is not controlled by the VA.

Further, that only granted claims will be used to accumulate the "points" required by the VA production standards. After all, the VA is supposedly in existence to grant claims when reasonable and possible.

NOT to take the opposite path of denial whenever possible by any means at hand.

"None of this crap happened overnight either and I think every single denied claim should be suspect for some sort of VA shinanigans."

Chuck75 your absolutely right if they had some sort of system in place like a "QUALITY CONTROL" they would have caught this ugly DENIAL right off the bat, it was plan ridicules. I knew going into this I would have to prove my claim and evidence was ignored and evidence turned in by my self and listed and date stamped was not considered and a half ass denial was written up that only made sense if I submitted no evidence and a "QUALITY CONTROL" center or "QUALITY CHECKS" would have caught and rain hell on someone for not doing there job. But I think the sad fact of the matter is they (RO) was doing its job, deny, deny, deny and if that don't work Shred, shred, shred and I have to add this stuff in Kentucky again it goes on all the time they just got caught ....

Edited by yoggie2

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use