Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What To Do When The Regional Office Violates Regulations?

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

What can we Vets do when the Regional Office Fails to follow Regulations?

Example: The Cleveland Regional Office is supposed to consider all claims and evidence before rendering a decision. Moody vs Principii says it this way:

"the VA has a duty to “fully and sympathetically develop a veteran’s claim to its optimum,” 251 F.3d at 1384 (quoting Hodge v. West, 155 F.3d 1356, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1998)), and that this requires the VA to “determine all potential claims raised by the evidence, applying all relevant laws and regulations.”

So, what do I do now that the Cleveland Regional Office "overlooked" my claim for more than 5 years, and refuses to acknowledge it?

I filed a NOD in 2004, and the Regional Office ignored my NOD and "interpreted it as a claim for benefits" instead.

What can we Vets do to force the Regional Office to obey its regulations? All my "Statements in support of claim" as well as 3 NOD's from 2004-2008 have simply been ignored.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

i wish i knew the answer to that too .regarding the cleveland office i have no

use for them what so ever as my claim somehow went through there. they

are as bad as my ro when it comes to denying claims as far as my experience

goes with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Inspector General, Congress or complain to Sec Peake directly is all I have

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That is a case where I would haunt my congressman's office until I heard something. No way a claim should take that long. Something is wrong and I bet they lost your claim, or it went in the shredder. Do you have proof of when you filed it and what you filed with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Bronc,,,,, I would do what John and Pete have suggested. First do you have thee copies and the certified receipts of sending to your VARO any and all of your claims and NODS??? You certainly must do everything by registered and signature receipt on all documents they get from you. This will be the only way you can have your day in court and prove your case that you did file and have NODs too. It all boils down to you have to prove this . Not the VA, even though by law they must ...."assist" you. ) Also who is helping you as far a VSO? They should be holding the VA to respond. It would be wise to contact your Senator , Congressman and make sure your paperwork is well documented. If you prevail and win your claim/award , then retro entitlement could possibly be due back to EED. Earliest Effective Date. I would not sit on this or give up ...just press your dated evidence and move ahead making them respond to your letters and complaints but having someone help you such as VSO/Congressman/Senator offices will also try and keep some sanity to an already crazy situation. Please don't feel that the VA has singled you out because all of us here at Hadit have been or are still putting up with the same old stuff you are talking about. God Bless,C.C. NEVER GIVE UP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I have copies of the NOD which was stamped received by the Cleveland Regional Office in a timely manner. Where I got the copy, is that I requested a complete copy of my C-file, and it was sent to me by the regional office, so there is no dispute as to whether or not they received it.

I got upset and filed a Writ of Mandamus 4 years later, largely due to inaction on the NOD. In their response to the Writ, the Cleveland Regional Office claimed that my NOD was "interpreted as a claim for benefits" and therefore not valid. However, this is actually false because there was never any benefits awarded or denied on that date. However, my appeal has been effectively terminated as they steadfastly refuse to take any action on in, in spite of my protests.

It looks like the Regional Office can interpret regulations in any manner they see fit, and I can not do anything about it.

If they can just say that the Veterans NOD was interpreted as something else, they can (and have) simply ignored the Veterans NOD. It is like the wolf guarding the chicken house, and giving any count they want on the chickens.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Please post the exact wording of your NOD that was submitted to/received by the RO, if possible. I don't want to slam a RO without knowing what was sent to them. :rolleyes:

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use