Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hired Lawyer

Rate this question


gp747

Question

i am sick of the whole mess i hired lawyer sent papers today. these vso's act like you are a pile of s--t when you try to get info out of them.i am sick of it ,they are worthless and more likely are to damage your claim rather than help. legal help for vets

is who i got . they were kind enough to extend my time for holding my files and i decided on them ,michael viterna.

if i do not hire lawyer i am going to really get screwed . this vso s--t isn't worth a damn and i am tired of their condescending e-mails when i want a simple answer.

i have no faith in vso's anymore and do not see what purpose they serve they sure haven't helped me ,what i have got was on my own.

they should be barred and let lawyers step in from the start,that would stop the backlog. the lawyers could get it right from the start and cut down on appeals .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"i have no faith in vso's anymore and do not see what purpose they serve they sure haven't helped me ,what i have got was on my own.

they should be barred and let lawyers step in from the start,that would stop the backlog. the lawyers could get it right from the start and cut down on appeals "

I agree sort of-

if the vet orgs canned their SOS and reps the moneys saved could be used for lawyers fees.But that aint gonna happen.

The best vet rep you will ever have is who you see in the mirror.

We know our claims in and out ( or at least we should)

and even the good reps and SOs out there (and I believe there are many) have hundreds of claims compared to one claim or a few that we have pending.

Some of the lawyers in my opinion-dont have a clue either-

the new lawyers who got on the June 2007 lawyer reg bandwagon are not up to speed.

It has taken me over a decade to know what I know about VA claims- and during that decade the regs have changed many times.

The 1,100 FNGs that the Ros have hired to help wih claims-while they might be well dedicated people hoping to do a good job-are absolutely unqualified for handling anything beyond the basics of VA 101 and we all know every claim is so unique that I feel their training will only be worth it after they have had years on the job.

A vets advocate and I discussed the AO outside of Vietnam situation at length the other day-and he suddenly sighed and said to me ----this stuff is so HARD!

Yes it is.It is time consuming and exhausting and the VA knows full well that they have put on disabled veterans much more then they should.

We really cannot rely-in my opinion-on any rep or lawyer-

to provide the VA what they state they need in the VCAA letters.

If we can give them what they ask for, and as long as they do not lose or destroy this evidence- we dont need reps or lawyers to succeed.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS IS THE VSO'S ANSWER TO QUESTION BELOW!!!

Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:20 AM

——Inline Attachment Follows——

I can not answer any of those questions. I don't have time to look all over the 3 floors of this building, hoping I will find something out.

I will wait for a letter. Like I told you, everyone you talk to on the phone can tell you a different story.

I have a lot of contacts with the Regional Office. I also have a LARGE case load. When you hear something, let me know.

Accredited Representative

THIS IS THE QUESTION I ASKED TO BE ANSWERED

^flfeB»,what I AM saying my claim according to iris is in^RO right now and iris said no letter was ever

sent and claim was sent to^RO for more development, surely you have contacts in RO where

you are and can find out what is going on. i cannot hear and had a hard time understanding RO REP 'who seems

to be a very nice guy and helpful.

i am wondering why it was ever sent to amc to start with.i have not filed an appeal all i asked for was an

increase ,son as dependent and some secondary claims.

when i do get letter it will all be over with then .unless i appeal to bva.

I EDITED A COUPLE WORDS LIKE NAMES TO RO AND SUCH.

lofl

THIS IS HOW MY VSO HAS BEEN ANSWERING ME !

2/14/2009 2:18 PM

Edited by scooby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS IS THE VSO'S ANSWER TO QUESTION BELOW!!!

Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:20 AM

——Inline Attachment Follows——

I can not answer any of those questions. I don't have time to look all over the 3 floors of this building, hoping I will find something out.

I will wait for a letter. Like I told you, everyone you talk to on the phone can tell you a different story.

I have a lot of contacts with the Regional Office. I also have a LARGE case load. When you hear something, let me know.

Accredited Representative

THIS IS THE QUESTION I ASKED TO BE ANSWERED

^flfeB»,what I AM saying my claim according to iris is in^RO right now and iris said no letter was ever

sent and claim was sent to^RO for more development, surely you have contacts in RO where

you are and can find out what is going on. i cannot hear and had a hard time understanding RO REP 'who seems

to be a very nice guy and helpful.

i am wondering why it was ever sent to amc to start with.i have not filed an appeal all i asked for was an

increase ,son as dependent and some secondary claims.

when i do get letter it will all be over with then .unless i appeal to bva.

I EDITED A COUPLE WORDS LIKE NAMES TO RO AND SUCH.

lofl

THIS IS HOW MY VSO HAS BEEN ANSWERING ME !

2/14/2009 2:18 PM

AND THAT AINT THE HALF OF IT I WILL NEVER TRUST ANOTHER VSO AGAIN THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING . THIS PERSON IS SOMETIMES IN THE SAME BUILDING AS THE RO. SHE COULD NOT PICK UP A PHONE AND TALK FOR A FEW MINUTES TO LET ME KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON . I STARTED TO ASK HER IF SHE WAS SHORTHANDED BECAUSE EVERYONE IS IN FLORIDA LIKE THEY USED TO TELL ME.

Edited by scooby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUESTION ON HIRING NEW LAWYER ,WHO WILL REPRESENT ME AT RO LEVEL?

I HAVE HIRED THIS NEW LAWYER THE PAPERWORK IS IN THE MAIL MY CLAIMS ARE BACK AT RO FROM AMC,I DO NOT KNOW WHERE I STAND ON THESE CLAIMS

MY POA WILL NOT TELL ME S--T ,SO MY QUESTION IS WILL NEW LAWYER BE ABLE TO WORK MY CLAIMS OR DO I WAIT FOR THE LAWYER TO TELL ME WHAT TO DO .

I KNOW I WANT THIS POA GONE YESTERDAY ,MAYBE THEY WILL TAKE ANOTHER TRIP TO FLORIDA BEFORE IT GETS TOO HOT ON THE TAXPAYERS DIME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUESTION ON HIRING NEW LAWYER ,WHO WILL REPRESENT ME AT RO LEVEL?

I HAVE HIRED THIS NEW LAWYER THE PAPERWORK IS IN THE MAIL MY CLAIMS ARE BACK AT RO FROM AMC,I DO NOT KNOW WHERE I STAND ON THESE CLAIMS

MY POA WILL NOT TELL ME S--T ,SO MY QUESTION IS WILL NEW LAWYER BE ABLE TO WORK MY CLAIMS OR DO I WAIT FOR THE LAWYER TO TELL ME WHAT TO DO .

I KNOW I WANT THIS POA GONE YESTERDAY ,MAYBE THEY WILL TAKE ANOTHER TRIP TO FLORIDA BEFORE IT GETS TOO HOT ON THE TAXPAYERS DIME.

Hopefully, this is correct: The AMC (Appeals Management Center) has two functions, which is development and decision making. The center is composed of three development teams and a decision team. It, AMC, has been referred to by some as a "super" VARO, handling mostly compensation and pension. *It sounds to me like may be yours was sent to AMC for further review and/or development. Did you ask for your compensation increase while parts of a prior decision was still pending?? *Example--my own claim was sent to AMC as I have requested "de novo" review by a Decision Review Officer concerning a VARO rating decision, they gave me from their interpretation of a BVA decision. Rating not to my satisfaction. In closing, be careful of any time limits noted on any VA letters you receive. Whether you sit down with an attorney or someone else----you need sombody with VA knowledge to ascertain just what level your claim is (or is not). Also, AMC will let you know if they need more evidence from you or if something is missing--as again one of "their" jobs in development. Time, time, more time,and they are not in a rush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A good Lawyer will take care of everything.

That said you should monitor and check that Lawyer is complying with deadlines its still your responsibility.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use