Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Gulf War Illness

Rate this question


mike/3/8/cav

Question

Hello everyone,

Got some questions. I went through IRIS in last November and requested an exam for the registery. In December I recieved a packet to fill out with all the forms and a return envelope to send back to the Phoenix address. I sent the forms and additional papers of links from this site about Gulf War Illnesses. I went through IRIS again to aks for the status and got a reply in about a week stating that I was to call and schedule my exam.

Today I called the 800# and talked to a service rep who said that my claim for increase for Headaches, r/l/arm condition, neck condition, bronchitis and eye condition were at the rating decision office. I never put a request in for increase. Wht would it get sent to a rating decision board? I have'nt even been to the exam yet. I have been to my initial exam last year and was given 0%sc for headaches, but no rating at all on the other conditions listed above.

My current compensation is 50%sc PTSD, 10%sc each knee and 10%sc l/ankle for a total service connection of 70%. Are the VA automatically sending my Registery packet to a rating board without another exam? I hope I'm not confusing anybody. It just is so confusing to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Mike, I did the registry immediately after I got out in July 1994. Without getting into my claims and never being examined for them back then, I have been told repeatedly over the past 1 1/2 years that "the Gulf War registry is just a registry. Filling that out did not count as filing a claim nor does it go into your C-file as it was simply a registry to be used for research'.

If they took your registry as a request for comp. and are gonna give you some, good deal! I tried for 6 months last year to track down my 'questionare" through the Los Angeles VAMC and all they were able to find was the bloodwork. If they were able to find the interview part I remember doing at the hospital there I think I would have had a pretty good shot at getting a earlier effective date for my PTSD since I remember talking about anger issues with the guy that interviewed me in 1994. Being 3000 miles away from where I did the paperwork, etc for it doesn't help me, but like I said if they wanna give you cash for it take it. Plus I would assume that they are admitting that you now have issues due to your Gulf service which opens them up to other claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike, I did the registry immediately after I got out in July 1994. Without getting into my claims and never being examined for them back then, I have been told repeatedly over the past 1 1/2 years that "the Gulf War registry is just a registry. Filling that out did not count as filing a claim nor does it go into your C-file as it was simply a registry to be used for research'.

If they took your registry as a request for comp. and are gonna give you some, good deal! I tried for 6 months last year to track down my 'questionare" through the Los Angeles VAMC and all they were able to find was the bloodwork. If they were able to find the interview part I remember doing at the hospital there I think I would have had a pretty good shot at getting a earlier effective date for my PTSD since I remember talking about anger issues with the guy that interviewed me in 1994. Being 3000 miles away from where I did the paperwork, etc for it doesn't help me, but like I said if they wanna give you cash for it take it. Plus I would assume that they are admitting that you now have issues due to your Gulf service which opens them up to other claims.

Thanks for the reply Quint. Maybe they don't want to give me another exam? It sounds strange that they would just send the info I sent them for the registery exam to a rating board. I don't think VA does that. If they do I think it would be a first. Although when I had my regular neuro exam they gave me the 0%sc for headaches and noting for the other problems, not even a 0%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure.

Normally registry information does not get to VARO. I'm not clear as to the full scope of IRIS, I've never used it but it appears that your requests through there may have alerted VARO to possible infered claims. Again, I don't know.

I do know VARO can open infered claims on your behalf if they have information of a possible SC condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure.

Normally registry information does not get to VARO. I'm not clear as to the full scope of IRIS, I've never used it but it appears that your requests through there may have alerted VARO to possible infered claims. Again, I don't know.

I do know VARO can open infered claims on your behalf if they have information of a possible SC condition.

Thanks time, It just sounds strange to me. From everything I have read here on hadit, things should'nt happen this well for vets through the VA system, it should be a lot more difficult. I guess I can only wait and see what happens now. I don't think I can be more active in asking them for additional in fo on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, if they offer it, take it.

I assumed back in 1994 that the registry was something that they would keep up with. they didn't. they did send me every copy of "The Gulf War review" for the past 15 years, but when I asked why that made it to me along with GI Bill checks but my denials from 1994 didn't, etc they did the "that's a seperate part of the VA. We don't exchange info" thing.

The only good thing (in my opinion of course) to come out of OIF/OEF is that VA might finally be held to the standards the law requires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I took the AO exam back in 2000 and they found three conditions that the doctor said were AO related. It says in the exam that the exam does not represent a claim for benefits. I think you have to claim any benefit for a registry condition. I know I had to do that for every condition, and I had to show the nexus for secondary conditions via a medical report other than the AO exam. The VA says they do inferred claims but, in reality, it does not happen often if at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use