Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Length Of Time In Board

Rate this question


pdandrea

Question

I am familiar with the "hurry up and wait " and " they are trying to denying claims", but I have a claim that has been in for over a year and have had all the documents and been in rating since Feb. 10. The Regional Office DAV branch, claims they have a good record and rarely do claims exceed a year with rating boards turning over their cases in a month.

These really aren't too difficult as far as some people out there not having service documentation, the dots are connected really close on these claims from service connection to becoming more severe. So what is the problem? and please if you are going to say "no news is good news" let me know why.

and if this helps seeking aid and attendance/ SMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I went through it and waiting can drive you insane. Perhaps a gentle nudge might help. I suggest that you notify the VARO that it has been a long time and that unless you get an explanation for the delay that you are putting them on notice that you plan to file a Writ of Mandamus very soon. I believe that Alex Humpfrey would tell then within 30 days.

If you do this it actually puts a Writ in better shape if you intend to do it.

The only thing else is if you are fortunate enough to live in a Congressional District that has a Veterans Advocate in Congress you can consider the Congressional Route.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went through it and waiting can drive you insane. Perhaps a gentle nudge might help. I suggest that you notify the VARO that it has been a long time and that unless you get an explanation for the delay that you are putting them on notice that you plan to file a Writ of Mandamus very soon. I believe that Alex Humpfrey would tell then within 30 days.

If you do this it actually puts a Writ in better shape if you intend to do it.

The only thing else is if you are fortunate enough to live in a Congressional District that has a Veterans Advocate in Congress you can consider the Congressional Route.

Good Luck

A writ of mandamus or simply mandamus, which means "we command" in Latin, is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law, and is "issued by a superior court to compel a lower court or a government officer to perform mandatory or purely ministerial duties correctly".[1]

Mandamus is a judicial remedy which is in the form of an order from a superior court to any government, subordinate court, corporation or public authority to do or forbear from doing some specific act which that body is obliged under law to do or refrain from doing, as the case may be, and which is in the nature of public duty and in certain cases of a statutory duty.[2] It cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against statutory provision.

Mandamus may be a command to do an administrative action or not to take a particular action, and it is supplemented by legal rights. It must be a judicially enforceable and legally protected right before one suffering a grievance can ask for a mandamus. A person can be said to be aggrieved only when he is denied a legal right by someone who has a legal duty to do something and abstains from doing it.

I had to look it up, so I posted it for anyone else who didn't know what it was.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I believe Meddac or poolguy could help and chime in here. My claim for increase was supposedly rated last month or so, but just got 'promulgated' and rating letter released few weeks back. I hope that the intensifying seriousness of your claimm is given a heavier weight. For instance when the claim was put in to add my dependents, it was considered a 'non-rated' claim. So I would hope your claim for 'aid&attendance', is given a heavier weight considering. Sure hope it is in good hands and near the top of the stack.

Best to ya,

Cowgirl'up2009!

I am familiar with the "hurry up and wait " and " they are trying to denying claims", but I have a claim that has been in for over a year and have had all the documents and been in rating since Feb. 10. The Regional Office DAV branch, claims they have a good record and rarely do claims exceed a year with rating boards turning over their cases in a month.

These really aren't too difficult as far as some people out there not having service documentation, the dots are connected really close on these claims from service connection to becoming more severe. So what is the problem? and please if you are going to say "no news is good news" let me know why.

and if this helps seeking aid and attendance/ SMC.

Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA when pushed by a Writ of Mandamus usually caves and gives a decision just as the Judge is about to rule.

If you file for a Writ the Judge will give the VA 30 days to respond. There is a long history of VA asking for extensions till the plantif says no. Than a decision as the VA likes to tell people that it has never lost to a Writ of Mandamus.

Just remember all the Judge will do is to tell the VA to do their job and give you a Decision if it comes to that but move it will. I doubt that the VA is willing to stand up to a Judge and tell them that they are to busy to make a decision on a Claim that old. All the Veteran has to do is to quote the VA BS about how quickly they do it for most Veterans.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Often, VARO's will just low ball or deny without much of an explanation. They know you'll NOD & this will delay payment decision another year or two.

If your claim went to rating(ready to wait status) it can easily take one to two years before you receive a SOC. The easiest ones, with all the ducks in a row get delayed, low-balled & denied just like the rest.

Put little faith in what the VARO's "DAV" officer tells you. Most work for the DAV.

I wouldn't file a "WRIT" until your claim has been idle for 16 months without a decision.

A writ will get the claim moving, but will generally result in a speedy denial.

Hopefully your claim will get processed without needless delay. But you should understand this is not the norm & plan for the worst.

Not trying to rain on your parade. It's just reality when it comes to DVA dirty tricks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

All the VA has to do delay your claim is to deny your claim, and force you to go to the DRO, and then on to the BVA if they want to play hardball. That will take a good three years right there. My CUE took 18 months to finally get to a DRO who denied it, and now it is going to the BVA which will take at least two years for a hearing with my lawyer. I have waited 37 years for justice so if I wait another two or three years so what ( if I live that long). The biggest weapon the VA has is dragging their feet in hopes the vet will die. The same with DIC. If they can drag it out long enough the spouse may die, especially if the spouse is elderly. It is the same with A&A for a surviving spouse who is in a nursing home. The VA just drags the award out and the spouse dies. They want us to die so they don't have to take care of us. Keep it in mind when you let the VA operate on you. They kill us with delays and negligence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use