Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Are My Chances?

Rate this question


noscopes4me

Question

Currently getting 70% for Flat feet 30%,Ankle 10%,knees and back another 20% etc. Filed Iu in december 08 had physical C&p in feb 09. Sent letter from private doctor saying I am unable to obttain gainful employment and reasons from my service connested disabilities. Statments from me and wife and last superviser ihad and co-workers of my problems at work.

Letter from physical therapist about treatments and prescribing me with a walking cane. having alot of problems with these and cannot walk hardly any distance anymore. Hoping I get Iu waiting about 2 mos now for decision letter. Anybody have an idea what my chances are it would be much appreciated thank you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

noscopes waiting for the VA to make a decision will only cause you more problems most vets getting SSD for PTSD end up having to go to a SS Judge which is usually a 2 year wait for the hearing, I would file for the SSD now and start the waiting period is't not going to get shorter, every case is different, I filed both claims at the same time SSD and VA for my heart problems in Nov 2002, my SSD was approved off of my VA medical records in April 2003 with a disability date of June 2002 which means I started getting SSD checks from Dec 2003 (5 month waiting period subtracted) my heart condition was JUST now awarded by the BVA Judge almost 7 years later and they all use the same records figure that one out, the VA does all it can to deny claims and it cases like mine and Berta's the RO's refuse to go back and read the entire file, in my case they just did not want to deal with the chemical weapon and drug exposures at Edgewood Arsenal in 1974, it was easier to use the fall back position that those experiments were "safe" yea sure.

File your SSD claim today it is only to your advantage and be prepared to hire a lawyer paying them the 25% is better than getting 100% of nothing

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I was told filing for iu you need a total of at least 60 or 70%. which Ii have"

That is a fallacy that the VA wants us to believe and many reps also support this unfounded lie.

You can apply for and receive TDIU even with no rating at all.

It is the medical evidence of TDIU due to service connection-(whether that is established or not yet by the VA) that qualifies any vet to apply for TDIU.

I used two personal examples here of claims I helped with to prove that point.

70% triggers VA to send the TDIU form out.

But a vet who has private records and proof of service nexus can apply for and receive TDIU regardless of any VA % they have.

SSA-dont wait too long- I think you must apply for SSA disability within 5 years of last employment- not sure-it is all at the SSA web site.

SSA could be awarded much faster than VA SC and the SSA award might be probative evidence to help the TDIU claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SSA-dont wait too long- I think you must apply for SSA disability within 5 years of last employment- not sure-it is all at the SSA web site.

I am almost identical to you. I have sc flat feet and L ankle. But I am only at 40%- 10% for flat feet (appealed), 20% for ankle and 10% for tinnitus (& 0% ;) for bilat hearing loss). But, all secondary conditions, R ankle, knees, hip, back... have been denied right down the line since 2004 to a few weeks ago. DRO granted them but I have to get a C&P exam (April 22, wish me luck!) to determine rating of those residuals, and then he'll decide on the TDIU claim.

On that matter, I have not worked since 2004 and I recently checked with the SS office and was informed I have to file by Dec this year or I lose my benefits.

So good luck with yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

As Berta says the actual regulations say that if you are unable to work due to a SC condition you are eligible for TDIU. The 70% rules is just something the VA has added on to discourage vets with lower ratings from filing. Even if you have 70% the VA can and will fight TDIU if they have an alternative reason for you being unemployable. I know because they tried that stunt on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I agree with Testvet and Berta

1) Waiting on filing for SSD costs you money, and could actually hurt your chances. Dont wait. If you are awarded $1000 per month SSD, then it costs you about $33 every day you delay if approved.

2) The VA likes to make Vets think that they are not rated high enough under the so called 70/60 rule to be approved for IU. But read that rule a little further, and it says to the effect that if the Veteran is not employable and fails to meet the 70/60 rule, he will be submitted for "special consideration" for IU.

The reason this happens is that the VA repeatedly low balls people so they cant qualify for IU, because that is big bucks. Then they deny IU based upon the 70/60 rule, and "forget" to give you "special consideration" when you have disabilities less than 70/60. Most Vets dont "catch" it and dont appeal, so they have saved money and rated another Veteran less than what he deserves. Even when the Vet does appeal, they have a list of arguements as long as your arm, like, "The Veteran did not ask for special consideration" or "The Veteran has other problems that are not service connected that contribute to IU " You have to fight most RO's tooth and nail for every nickel. Watch for "back door denials", too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Broncovet's second point is precisely why I said that it will be a uphill battle for you. Your best defense against a denial of IU is to file a claim for increase on your 30% condition first. When you get above 30% on that issue, then file for IU. Don't let that stop you from filing for SSDI, though.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use