Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

They Denied My Nod For Retro Pay

Rate this question


iraqx2

Question

Here is a quick summary of my situation-

When I was on 30% for PTSD for a couple years, the VA decided to call me in for an reevaluation on Dec, 2007.

A C&P was done and the a decision was made in January 2008, keeping my rating at 30% ( meaning a VA way of saying ooops, he is actually worse )

I filed an NOD in April 2008, stating that my C&P results/Dr.'s Statement was actually warranting a 70 % rating.

May 2008, they then decided to denied my request, but gave the option to file another NOD.

In November 2008 when I lost my job, I filed another NOD, which resulted in another C&P exam and also submitted new evidence from private doctor.

April 2009, a favorable decision was made giving me 70 for PTSD. I then filed another C&P stating the retro was calculated from November 2008 and should have been carried over from the original NOD from April, which was off the exam from Nov 2007.

The other day they sent a unique letter ( more like someone actually personally typed it ) stating that my NOD is invalid and my effective date was indeed when the new evidences were submitted in November. The letter also mentioned my claim for TDIU and if I wanted to drop the appeal. The tone was more like " we gave you what you wanted, now you want a bigger retro?".

They are saying that my symptoms have worsened, but only since November 2008.

I am saying ( including the results of the original C&P )that my symptoms have worsened since November 2007 and the lastest decision is a win based off the original C&P Exam in November of 2007. It should be a continuous of my original appeal. We are talking about $10k worth of retro.

What should I do now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

No increase in rating during the years my claim was on appeal and bouncing back and forth from the VARO to the BVA. But I recently filed a CUE all the way back to 1971 and my lawyer says "we" will win. See what happens when you piss off an old fart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic raises a point that I dont think we talk about much- staged ratings.

It is up to the VA to determine if a staged rating in a retro award is appropriate and I dont think they even take the time to do that anymore unless the vet requests it.

I should have done that in 1997-Nodded the posthumous 100% P & T award they gave my husband but I didnt really know much then.

I wondered -since the award was for 100% -a jump from his 30% in his lifetime- obviously he didn't get from 30 to 100 in a day.

There are cases at BVA as to staged ratings.

They are supposed to determine the level of SC as it increases-but I think this point has to be raised by the vet-to ask for an appropriate staged rating.

This would have impact on many retro awards.

The VA said Rod was 30% until 1991 then 100%- that means at some point he was 50% and then 70% too.

Obviously those facts would have altered the retro.

I would think his 2 VAMC hospitalizations and other stuff would have warranted the staged ratings as they showed his 30% was getting worse prior to the EED they gave him for the 100%.

Then again I didnt NOD it.Maybe I should CUE it.

But the truth is I cant wait for them to finally resolve my issues as they stand and get it all over with-because they have given me VA induced PTSD and PMS (pissing and moaning syndrome)

and VAola paranoia- (when you read a regulation and know exactly what it says and how it applies to your claim-yet you question your own sanity and ability to read because you know the VA will try to manipulate it no matter what you do)

Still- how many of you actually deserved staged ratings? and actually got them?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use