Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Quick Status Update

Rate this question


rentalguy1

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

You all know that I won my TDIU P&T claim a few months back. I've been getting the correct amount with absolutely no troubles out of them. The wife and son are set up on ChampVA, which was too easy, and we are having no trouble on that end. We went to the reserve center and got our ID cards today, and had no trouble on that end. I applied for property tax relief with my county, and so far I have had no trouble on that end, except that they have yet to send me a refund of last year's property taxes. The only area I am having grief in is the DRO hearing that I filed for in August of last year. I am still on a waiting list to get a hearing date, but at this point all I am really looking at is a few months of back pay, so I can deal with it.

See boys and girls, the VA can play nice sometimes. Now I need to decide if I want to file a claim for SMC K (foot drop) or wait until my appeal is finalized.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you wait to file for the SMC for foot drop then your effective date will be later. Are you filing your DRO for an EED for something besides the TDIU. What kind of money are we talking about because it is all about money. I don't know if a new claim will slow down your DRO Hearing or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The DRO hearing is for my shotgun claim, which was filed before the TDIU claim. I went from 20% to 90%, but they lowballed a few things and denied a few things, all of which would have put me at 100% schedular. I would be looking at the difference between 90% and 100% (with 3 dependants) for about 14 months if I win the appeal. That would be roughly $14K. If I go ahead and file for SMC, it would make the wait time on the appeal stretch out, but would have no impact on the final outcome. If I wait to file for SMC, it would cost me roughly $100 a month until I file and win. I think I will go ahead and file it this week.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Rentalguy

You have helped others on this board, and I thank you for that. IMHO you should NEVER wait to apply for benefits for the following reasons:

1. Waiting to apply costs you money as it is a later effective date.

2. Waiting to apply only seems to prevent delays, because delays are as inevitable as the sun coming up tommorrow. The VA WILL Delay your claim, no matter what. They have plenty of financial incentives to delay claims. For example:

a) Bonuses are paid when VA employees delay claims (though the Va denies this, the VAOIG says differently)

http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/nf09/nfmay09/nf052209-5.htm

:D The Veteran may die before approval, so the longer the VA delays, the more likely the Veteran is to die before approval, and then VA pays nothing.

c) The Veteran may abandon his claim and the VA wont pay, and Veterans sometimes abandon claims because they forget about them because it takes so long.

d) Even if the claim is approved, with retro, the VA gets an interest free loan from the Veteran because they pay 0% interest to the Veteran on retro payments.

Bottom Line: Waiting to apply costs you money in retro, and does not "hurry up" your claim, the VA simply uses a different excuse to delay you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think I agree with Broncovet. I never delayed filing claims and I don't believe it made any real difference in my wait time. I asked to see my C-File, and it saved me about 2 years by not going to the BVA. One is a new claim and one is an appeal. Just be sure you get a VCAA letter on the footdrop so it does not get lost. If you don't get a VCAA letter for the footdrop then something is wrong. Unless the VA is going to put off the DRO until they can develope the footdrop and rate it I don't see why this new claim should have any impact on existing appeals. I could be wrong because with these people it is hard to know what their logic is sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use