Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appeal Granted Big White Envolope Received

Rate this question


slphelan

Question

Started this claim in 2006 after getting of Active Duty in 1995. I was granted 10% and filed NOD for the 5 Denied Claims.

No nexus since I had been out of the Army since 1995 till 2006. Started PCP at the VA Hospital Tampa Florida.

Filed Notce of Disagreement DRO review that was rubber stamped: Denied.

Filed Form 9 and requested DRO Hearing.

Requested and obtained IMO from Dr. Bash. Hearing delayed as the C-file took almost a year to obtain. Rescheduled DRO Hearing.

DRO Hearing completed 04/2009.

Contacted by VSO by e-mail on 6/8/2009 rating completed by DRO.

Submitted Dependent claim 6/11/2009.

Regional Office St Petersburg Authorization Completed 7/8/2009 for all requested claims and dependents also.

Letter received 7/11/2009.

No Deposit in Bank as of 7/11/2009.

Thanks everyone for your help in getting this claim completed I would have had to settle for the initial 10% if I did not have you and your years of experience to fall back on and learn about the VA system. Now at 60% thanks again guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Good work, congratulations!!! ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a claim that is going to the BVA I just recieaved from the va a Statement of the case asking if I want to contiunue with the case or I dont. My claim is for sleep apnea I turned in two statements from veterans that were on active duty with me and witnessed my sleep problems but they still went ahead and denied it because there was no medical diagnose of the symtom. My ? is how much does buddy statement carry in a claim.I want to continue but I am to tired and sick to go on. Since I was diagnose with PTSD I have been taken alot of medications for which I have gained 40 pounds and it has affected my sleep apnea, Need some advice.

x

x

x

Good work, congratulations!!! ~Wings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Windy your only real chance as I see it is to get a Doc to diagnose and connect to your service.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you like the Tampa VAMC? Have you ever found a parking place? I have Dr. Hodges as my PCP and Dr. Lowery as my shrink. Both are pretty good. Lowery is the best shrink they have.

Its fine i think that since its so busy its going to be hard finding parking until the garage is constructed. I am on the Delta Team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

congrats, so is it safe to say when you get a brown envelope its a denial and white for approval?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if ptsd and and the madications I take for its treatment has cause me to gain so much weight that it is aggravating my sleep apnea could that be a nexus.

Having buddy letters from service is great evidence of Nexus but a diagnosis is also important. Like Pete said, even with letters you will most likely need an independent medical opinion.

Here are the three requirements for service connection.

Requirements for the Award of Service-Connected Disability

Compensation. The award of service-connected disability compensation has

several requirements. First, the fundamental eligibility requirements discussed above

— service and discharge requirements — must be met. Then, for a veteran to be

entitled to service-connected disability compensation, the veteran must prove three

elements. These elements are: 1) a medical diagnosis of the current disability; 2)

medical evidence, and in some instances lay evidence, of the in-service occurrence

or worsening of an injury or disease; and 3) a link between the in-service-incident or

the worsening of a disease or injury and the current disability.59 If the VA is satisfied

that these three elements are proved, then the VA determines the severity of the

disability.60 The VA assigns a percentage evaluation from 0% to 100% for the

amount of disability that the VA determines that the veteran has sustained.61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use